Boost your Grades with us today!
Compare and contrast two change theories, and determine which theory makes the most sense for implementing your specific EBP intervention NRS 493
Sample Answer for Compare and contrast two change theories, and determine which theory makes the most sense for implementing your specific EBP intervention NRS 493 Included After Question
Compare and contrast two change theories, and determine which theory makes the most sense for implementing your specific EBP intervention NRS 493
Topic 4 DQ 2
Compare and contrast two change theories, and determine which theory makes the most sense for implementing your specific EBP intervention. Why? Has your preceptor used either theory, and to what result?
A Sample Answer For the Assignment: Compare and contrast two change theories, and determine which theory makes the most sense for implementing your specific EBP intervention NRS 493
Title: Compare and contrast two change theories, and determine which theory makes the most sense for implementing your specific EBP intervention NRS 493
One change theory, very widely used in nursing, is Lewin’s Change Theory. Lewin developed the change model to illustrate how people react when facing changes in their lives. The three stages of this process include unfreezing (the person has an existing state), moving or changing towards new ways of being, and then refreezing into a new state. The theory has barriers and facilitators, referred to as driving and resistant forces. Driving forces facilitate change because they push the person in the desired direction. For this theory to be successful the facilitating factors must overcome barriers and resistance (Current Nursing, 2020).
Kotter’s Eight-Step Change Model, created in 1995, includes the following change management steps: create a sense of urgency for change, form a guiding change team, create a vision and plan for change, communicate the change vision and plan with stakeholders, remove change barriers, provide short-term wins, build on the change, and make the change stick in the culture. According to Kotter change happens when at least 75% of employees are convinced that change is necessary. This sense of urgency is developed among employees by “change leaders” with a focus on what are new realities, what are threats and new opportunities. In this theory, the vision for change needs to be agreed upon Barrow, Annamaraju &Toney-Butler, 2021).
Lewin and Kotter’s theories both must overcome resistance for change to occur. Lewin’s theory, more generalized, is described in three steps as opposed to Knotter’s whose theory put emphasis on organizations, highlighting teamwork and coalition formation.
Compare and contrast two change theories, and determine which theory makes the most sense for implementing your specific EBP intervention NRS 493 References
Barrow, J. M., Annamaraju, P., & Toney-Butler, T. J. (2021). Change Management. StatPearls StatPearls Publishing. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK459380
Current Nursing. (2020). Change Theory – Kurt Lewin. https://www.currentnursing.com/nursing_theory/change_theory.html
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: Compare and contrast two change theories, and determine which theory makes the most sense for implementing your specific EBP intervention NRS 493
Replies
Kurt Lewin not only has a nursing theory, he is considered the father of social psychology and the designer of the nursing model known as Change Theory and it his original theory which others have used as a foundation. (Petiprin, 2020). Lewin’s Change Theory is known as the “unfreeze-change-refreeze model” with 3-concepts or steps which are the “driving forces, restraining forces and equilibrium” per Petiprin (2020). The key points of Lewin’s change model is compelling forces, “restraining forces and equilibrium” (Petiprin, 2020).
Step 1 = “Unfreeze”: to put aside old ways of doing things. Helping people to do away with old patters or habits, increasing the key need to readdress away from the something has always been done.
Step 2 – “Change” in ways of thinking, acting and/or feeling that is a more productive manner.
Step 3 = “Refreeze” establishing solid actions, ways of doing things or habits in such (firm/solid/established) way that the actions, thoughts or feeling replace the prior. If this is not fully established the olde ways shall become new again ~ not actually replaced per Petiprin, 2020. (side thought: if no fresh trays and water for the “icecubes of life”…trays of ice just left on the counter and melted, but not really dealt with ~ using the same olde water, not a fresh source for fresh cubes to be created)
Lippitt has a Seven-Step Change Theory that has the foundation of Levin’s change theory [er .
Step 1: Acknowledge (Diagnosis) the problem: come to grips as to the issue or problem by looking at information, data or the big picture to assess what needs to be and that whoever shall be affected by the change is committed to the outcome needed.
Step 2: “Assess the change agent’s motivation and capability for change”: assess what shall be needed to in the process of achieving the change.
Step 3: “Assess the change agent’s motivation, resources, experiences, stamina and dedication”
Step 4: “Select progressive change objectives”: assess what needs to be done, what is needed to achieve accomplish it and how to go about it to get it done.
Step 5: “Explain the role of the change agent to all employees” to assure everyone fully comprehends what is needed and expected of them.
Step 6: “Maintain change”: encourage and welcome interaction from employees
Step 7: “Gradually terminate the helping relationship of the change agent”: due to a full understanding and utilization of change incorporated, the change agent shall not be needed, as the employees shall fully realize the importance of the changes made and shall “take ownership” going forward and sharing the information/new ways/procedures/interventions with others. (per Wisconsin Technical Manner, n.d.)
The comparison is that Lippitt’s change theory made use of the foundation of Levin’s change theory which was concise and to the point and branched it out to expound upon it, creating a more detailed set of steps (WTCS, n.d.). Although it seems too many steps, Lippitt’s 7-Step Change Theory seems to make most sense, especially in the light of out-patient care regarding Covid-19 at the site of my preceptorship and capstone. The site I am at does not utilize either theory, yet verbalized Lippitt’s theory would work well in most medical settings.
Compare and contrast two change theories, and determine which theory makes the most sense for implementing your specific EBP intervention NRS 493 Resources
Petiprin, A. (2020). Kurt Lewin – Nursing theorist. Nursing Theory. https://nursing-theory.org/nursing-theorists/Kurt-Lewin.php
Wisconsin Technical College System (WTCS) . (n.d.). https://wtcs.pressbooks.pub/nursingmpc/chapter/4-3-implementing-change/#footnote-993-1
The three stages that make up the Lewin theory of change are known as “unfreezing,” “moving,” and “refreezing.” It argues that the cycle will ultimately repeat itself because unfreezing occurs when there is a requirement for change, movement occurs while change is occurring, and refreezing occurs when change is stabilized, and equilibrium has been achieved. Because of this, forces are set in motion that either encourage or discourage change (Petiprin, 2020).
- Unfreezing (when change is needed).
- Moving (when change is initiated).
- Refreezing (when equilibrium is established).
The approach proposed by Lewin is highly logical, goal- and plan-oriented. It does not take into consideration personal circumstances, which are a potential driving force for change. On the other hand, the change hypothesis developed by Prochaska and DiClemente It outlines a change process that is more generic, and as a result, it is less particular. It suggests that rather than going around the problem, people should learn from their past mistakes by reflecting on such experiences. My preceptor claims that she frequently makes use of Lewin’s and Lippet’s change theories when she wants to launch a change since these theories are highly persuasive and drive people to change. Additionally, the theories assist her in recognizing any and all types of resistance that may impede the process of change implementation.
Compare and contrast two change theories, and determine which theory makes the most sense for implementing your specific EBP intervention NRS 493 Reference:
Petiprin, A. (2020). Kurt Lewin – Nursing theorist. Nursing Theory. https://nursing-theory.org/nursing-theorists/Kurt-Lewin.php
Great post Kitty! One change theory is Lewin’s 3 stage change model that includes, unfreezing, moving, and refreezing. Saying that unfreezing is when you recognize change is needed, moving is when a change occurs, refreezing is when equilibrium is established, and you’re satisfied with the results. The cycle may eventually repeat itself (Study, 2021).
Lippitt’s seven-phase theory is another alternative. Begin by diagnosing the problem, assessing motivation and ability for change, assessing the motivation and resources of the change agent, selecting the right role of the change agent, maintaining the difference, and ending the assisting connection.
Lippit’s seven-phase theory may be more equivalent to the nursing process; there is little difference between the two, but Lewin’s contains three basic processes. Nursing is frequently far more complicated than the three levels. Looking back on my experiences as a critical care nurse, some circumstances were less complicated, but the majority were complex on numerous levels. Because these people are in critical condition, the issues that need to be addressed are as well. It appears that getting stuck in the Moving phase after three steps would be simple.
Study Corgi, (Mar 2021). Kotter’s Change Management Theory in Nursing Practice. Retrieved from https://studycorgi.com/kotters-change-management-theory-in-nursing-practice/#background
Compare and contrast two change theories, and determine which theory makes the most sense for implementing your specific EBP intervention NRS 493 Grading Rubric
Performance Category | 100% or highest level of performance
100% 16 points |
Very good or high level of performance
88% 14 points |
Acceptable level of performance
81% 13 points |
Inadequate demonstration of expectations
68% 11 points |
Deficient level of performance
56% 9 points
|
Failing level
of performance 55% or less 0 points |
Total Points Possible= 50 | 16 Points | 14 Points | 13 Points | 11 Points | 9 Points | 0 Points |
Scholarliness
Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic topics. |
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three or more of the following elements
|
16 Points | 14 Points | 13 Points | 11 Points | 9 Points | 0 Points | |
Application of Course Knowledge
Demonstrate the ability to analyze and apply principles, knowledge and information learned in the outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations |
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three of the following elements
|
10 Points | 9 Points | 6 Points | 0 Points | |||
Interactive Dialogue
Initial post should be a minimum of 300 words (references do not count toward word count) The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each (references do not count toward word count) Responses are substantive and relate to the topic. |
Demonstrated all of the following:
|
Demonstrated 3 of the following:
|
Demonstrated 2 of the following:
|
Demonstrated 1 or less of the following:
|
||
8 Points | 7 Points | 6 Points | 5 Points | 4 Points | 0 Points | |
Grammar, Syntax, APA
Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing. The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition Error is defined to be a unique APA error. Same type of error is only counted as one error. |
The following was present:
AND
AND
|
The following was present:
AND/OR
AND/OR
|
The following was present:
AND/OR
AND/OR
|
The following was present:
AND/OR
AND/OR
|
The following was present:
AND/OR
AND/OR
AND/OR
|
The following was present:
AND/OR
AND/OR
|
0 Points Deducted | 5 Points Lost | |||||
Participation
Requirements |
Demonstrated the following:
|
Failed to demonstrate the following:
|
||||
0 Points Lost | 5 Points Lost | |||||
Due Date Requirements | Demonstrated all of the following:
A minimum of one peer and one instructor responses are to be posted within the course no later than Sunday, 11:59 pm MT. |
Demonstrates one or less of the following.
A minimum of one peer and one instructor responses are to be posted within the course no later than Sunday, 11:59 pm MT. |