Comparative Animal Physiology
Taxa Vertebrates Fish Amphibians Salamanders Frogs and Toad Reptiles Lizards Snakes Turtles tortoises Birds Mammals Invertebrates Corals Jelly fish Round worms Flat worms Mollusks Arthropods Arachnids Crustaceans Insects Single Celled Archaea Bacteria Eukarya Viruses Organismal Organ systems Timing Rhythms Temperature Metabolism Materials Transports Systems Respiration Circulation Digestion Excretory Muscular Nervous Endocrine Sensory Immunological Realm Extreme Fresh water Deep Ocean Soil Hydrothermal vents Land Hotsprings Ocean Estuaries Rocky Intertidal Rocky outcrops Polar regions Caves Deep in Soil Rainforests Abiotic Variables Temperature Light Pressure Water pH Osmolarity Noise Level of biological organization Cellular Tissue Organ Organ system Whole organism First name Robert Brendon Amanda Ashley Luis Reinaldo Assia Jonair Nicolas Michael Michelle Ali Nicolik Jacob Mark Emma Tony Christina Emma Riya Mercedes Amy Victor Emilie-Ann Angelique Sumeya Hannah Salma Phoebe Reema Mina Last Name Stevenson Lee De Oliveira Figueroa Rosado Costa Almomani Alves-tran Fuest Zhang Vu Hachem Brown Harris Woodnorth Meschino Thang Charles Schneider Patel Trinidad Hoang Quadros Pompilus Gutierrez Mohamed Lakin Beramdane Tang Elrefaie Koo Career Direction Graduation Semester Science research Summer 1974 Science research Spring 2024 PA School May 2024 PA Spring 2023 Biotech Spring 2023 Medicine Fall 2023 Medicine May 2024 science research, medicine Spring 2023 Science Research Spring 2023 Medicine Summer 2023 Medicine Spring 2024 PA Spring 2024 Medicine Spring 2024 PA Spring 2023 Grad School Spring 2023 Unknown Fall 2023 Research Spring 2024 Medicine Spring 2023 Pharma/Biotech Spring 2023 Medicine May 2024 Medicine Spring 2023 PHARMD/ research Spring 2023 Research Spring 2024 Medicine/Research Fall 2023 Veterinarian Spring 2024 Medicine/Pharma Spring 2023 Veterinarian fall 2023 Medicine Spring 2024 Vet Med Spring 2023 Research/Medicine Spring 2024 PA/Research Spring 2023 Miray Jessica Melanie izailla (izzy) Prabin(Pula) Christiana Zheen Fernando Jessica Madjina Yildiz Kierzek Nguyen chagas Shrestha Odewumi Balata Dominguez Tran Beaucejour Research PA Research PA school Vet school Medicine Medicine Science Research PA Med School spring 2024 Spring 2023 Spring 2024 spring 2023 Spring 2024 Spring 2023 Spring 2024 Spring 2024 Spring 2024 May 2023 Topics of interest Lizard thermoregulation Ambystoma Mexicanum (Axolotl) Regeneration Mammalian Anatomy Canis Lupus Familiaris Limb Regeneration Camoflauge in Chameleon Salamander Regeneration turtles tortoises Dreams in Mammals Snake digestion Drosophila Melanogaster Embryo Development Camoflauge in Mammals Reptiles, Snakes Mammalian Nervous System Bioinformatics Coral Regeneration Ocean, arctic regions Mammalian Circulatory System Reptiles, praying mantises Snakes, Deep Ocean, Rainforests Jellyfish Nervous system, metabolism, homestasis Amphibian Endocrinology and Disease Ecology Mammalian anatomy/physiology Jellyfish, Rainforest, Deep Ocean deep ocean, cancer research, limb regeneration intelligence of elephants / hotsprings marine species Regeneration, Deep Ocean Axolotl regeneration, Allopregnanolone levels in mammals (female and male differences) Amphibians temperature/ virus turtles/tortoises Mammalian Respiratory System Soil Ecology, Ocean Invertebrates temperature homeostasis Mammalian Anatomy/physiology mammalian sensory neuron Mammalian organ system Amphibians, Arthropods, Digestion, Sensory, Immunological, Turtles tortoises, sensory systems
| Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | ||
| Main Postinga | 45 (45%) – 50 (50%)
Answers all parts of the discussion question(s) expectations with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.
Supported by at least three current, credible sources.
Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
40 (40%) – 44 (44%)
Responds to the discussion question(s) and is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth.
Supported by at least three credible sources.
Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
35 (35%) – 39 (39%)
Responds to some of the discussion question(s).
One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed.
Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.
Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
Post is cited with two credible sources.
Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors.
Contains some APA formatting errors. |
0 (0%) – 34 (34%)
Does not respond to the discussion question(s) adequately.
Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria.
Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.
Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
Contains only one or no credible sources.
Not written clearly or concisely.
Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors.
Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
|
| Main Post: Timeliness | 10 (10%) – 10 (10%)
Posts main post by day 3. |
0 (0%) – 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Does not post by day 3. |
|
| First Response | 17 (17%) – 18 (18%)
Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.
Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.
Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.
Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
15 (15%) – 16 (16%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.
Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
13 (13%) – 14 (14%)
Response is on topic and may have some depth.
Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.
Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.
Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited. |
0 (0%) – 12 (12%)
Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.
Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.
Responses to faculty questions are missing.
No credible sources are cited. |
|
| Second Response | 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.
Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.
Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.
Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.
Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
12 (12%) – 13 (13%)
Response is on topic and may have some depth.
Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.
Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.
Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited. |
0 (0%) – 11 (11%)
Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.
Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.
Responses to faculty questions are missing.
No credible sources are cited. |
|
| Participation | 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Meets requirements for participation by posting on three different days. |
0 (0%) – 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Does not meet requirements for participation by posting on 3 different days. |
|
| Total Points: 100 | |||||