CNL-610: Topic 4 and 7 Treatment Plan

CNL-610: Topic 4 and 7 Treatment Plan

Sample Answer for CNL-610: Topic 4 and 7 Treatment Plan Included After Question

Description

In Topic 4, you submitted a treatment plan for your client Eliza. Since the initial treatment plan, several changes have taken place within Eliza’s case. Read Eliza’s Case Study: Part Three. Since the mandatory assessment 2 weeks ago, you have discovered that Eliza is again on your client listing for the day due to a mandatory evaluation, with the incident report indicating that campus public safety, due to a tip from a concerned resident, found the client passed out and alone in her dorm, smelling of alcohol.

Part 1: Review the initial Treatment Plan submitted in Topic 4.

Reassess your treatment plan diagnoses, goals, and objectives based on the new information provided.

Fill out and submit a new treatment plan evidencing the changes made in treatment utilizing the treatment plan template provided.

  • Part 2: In a 1,000-1,250-word essay, answer the questions presented in a separate Word document, addressing the following:
  • Examine the case and propose why the changes occurred.

Reassess the effectiveness and validity of the treatment plan.

Discuss how the treatment plan needs to be adjusted to address the changes in the situation.

  • Justify the changes both ethically and legally.
  • Determine what the changes (obstacles) mean to the treatment plan.
  • Discuss how you would evaluate the resources available for you to make a referral.
  • Discuss how you would communicate to the client the need for referrals to other behavioral health care professionals.
  • Determine which referrals you would make and how you would collaborate with other behavioral health care professionals.
  • Include any instruments you would use to assess the client.

CNL-610: Topic 4 and 7 Treatment Plan Based on the information provided and feedback from your Instructor on previous assignments concerning the case of Eliza, complete the treatment plan below. Be sure to include a description of the problem, goal statements, objectives, and interventions. Remember to incorporate the client’s strengths and support system in the treatment plan. *** Note: You are required to have a minimum of two overall goals, two objectives for each goal, and one intervention for each objective. If you have more than two overall goals, simply copy and paste the chart below. Client: Click or tap here to enter text. Date: _______ Age: ________ DOB: ________ ICD-9 (ICD-10) Code: DSM-5 Diagnosis (Include Specifiers and Modifiers): Description of the Problem: Goal # 1: Objective(s): 1. Intervention(s): Frequency: ☐ Weekly ☐ Bi Weekly ☐ Monthly ☐ other: ____________________ Modality: ☐ Group ☐ Individual ☐Family 2. ☐ Weekly ☐ Bi Weekly ☐ Monthly ☐ other: ____________________ Modality: ☐ Group ☐ Individual ☐Family © 2019. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved. Target Date: Description of the Problem: Goal # 1: Objective(s): 1. Intervention(s): Frequency: ☐ Weekly ☐ Bi Weekly ☐ Monthly ☐ other: ____________________ Modality: ☐ Group ☐ Individual ☐Family 2. ☐ Weekly ☐ Bi Weekly ☐ Monthly ☐ other: ____________________ Modality: ☐ Group ☐ Individual ☐Family © 2019. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved. Target Date: CNL-610 Eliza D Case Study: Part Three Directions: Throughout this course you will be reviewing a case study about Eliza D. The information from the case study will be used to complete several different course assignments. Read part three of Eliza’s case study below for the completion of your Topic 6 and 7 assignments. Four weeks after your initial assessment with Eliza, she attended a follow up meeting for a revised assessment based on new information received from the Office of Campus Life. The client has been in counseling with another therapist at the university for the last four weeks and has voluntarily attended some classes at the Drug and Alcohol Center. The client became agitated when she realized the meeting was for a different purpose than simply reviewing her initial goals. Campus Life has provided information that Campus Police have responded to two more drinking incidents in the client’s dorm, and Eliza was involved in both incidents. She now has a charge for public intoxication, which means the alcohol classes are mandatory, as well as counseling at least twice per month, also mandated. Eliza angrily expresses her frustration over having “more to do on top of studying and tutorials” and vehemently denies her involvement in the drinking incidents; she continues to insist she is innocent, that her friends in the dorm are the ones causing the problems, and that she does not have a drinking problem. Eliza is visibly upset and cries frequently during the meeting. You observe agitated behaviors and she continually shifts in her seat, pulling her longer sleeves even farther down over her hands, and rarely makes eye contact. You have information that grades in two of her classes have slipped to a B-, and that she has missing three tutorial sessions in the last 2 weeks. She denies SI and agrees to show you her arms. At the end of the session, the client’s parents arrived on campus, and asked for your assistance locating resources in their hometown for discharge planning with Eliza by the end of the semester. Eliza’s parents agreed to follow through with discharge recommendations for counseling and support groups. © 2019. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

 

A Sample Answer For the Assignment: CNL-610: Topic 4 and 7 Treatment Plan

Title: CNL-610: Topic 4 and 7 Treatment Plan

  Excellent Good Fair Poor
Main Posting 45 (45%) – 50 (50%)

Answers all parts of the discussion question(s) expectations with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.

 

Supported by at least three current, credible sources.

 

Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

40 (40%) – 44 (44%)

Responds to the discussion question(s) and is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

 

At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth.

 

Supported by at least three credible sources.

 

Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

35 (35%) – 39 (39%)

Responds to some of the discussion question(s).

 

One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed.

 

Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.

 

Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

 

Post is cited with two credible sources.

 

Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors.

 

Contains some APA formatting errors.

0 (0%) – 34 (34%)

Does not respond to the discussion question(s) adequately.

 

Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria.

 

Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.

 

Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

 

Contains only one or no credible sources.

 

Not written clearly or concisely.

 

Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors.

 

Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style.

Main Post: Timeliness 10 (10%) – 10 (10%)

Posts main post by day 3.

0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

Does not post by day 3.

First Response 17 (17%) – 18 (18%)

Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.

 

Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.

 

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.

 

Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.

 

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

 

Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.

 

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

15 (15%) – 16 (16%)

Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.

 

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

 

Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.

 

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.

 

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

13 (13%) – 14 (14%)

Response is on topic and may have some depth.

 

Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.

 

Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.

 

Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.

0 (0%) – 12 (12%)

Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.

 

Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.

 

Responses to faculty questions are missing.

 

No credible sources are cited.

Second Response 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)

Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.

 

Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.

 

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.

 

Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.

 

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

 

Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.

 

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

14 (14%) – 15 (15%)

Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.

 

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

 

Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.

 

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.

 

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

12 (12%) – 13 (13%)

Response is on topic and may have some depth.

 

Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.

 

Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.

 

Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.

0 (0%) – 11 (11%)

Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.

 

Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.

 

Responses to faculty questions are missing.

 

No credible sources are cited.

Participation 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Meets requirements for participation by posting on three different days.

0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

Does not meet requirements for participation by posting on 3 different days.

Total Points: 100