BSN- FP 4010 demonstrating the need for a health promotion and disease prevention initiative for the population

Sample Answer for BSN- FP 4010 demonstrating the need for a health promotion and disease prevention initiative for the population Included After Question

Preparation

Your team has succeeded in demonstrating the need for a
health promotion and disease prevention initiative for the population
identified by your Windshield Survey assessment. Now you need to develop a
proposal for a wellness education program that will help bridge the gaps in health
care service delivery.

Use the Capella library and the Internet to find scholarly
and professional resources that will help you propose a wellness education
program for the health concern of your population. Find at least four resources
to use in this assessment. You may also want to review the previous assessments
you completed in this course.

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: BSN- FP 4010 demonstrating the need for a health promotion and disease prevention initiative for the population

Requirements

BSN- FP 4010 demonstrating the need for a health promotion and disease prevention initiative for the population

Based on your Windshield Survey and Organizational
Evaluation assessments, complete the following:

Design an evidence-based wellness program to address the
primary health concern of the population that integrates:

Cultural considerations: Will you need to consult with
someone from the population on how to approach the delivery of your program?

CAM, traditional medicine, holistic health, and spirituality
considerations.

Linguistic considerations: Will you need interpreters or
translators for either written or oral presentations?

Educational considerations: What will be the best way to
educate the population?

Describe how you will market or advertise the wellness
program.

What are the benefits the program offers the population?

Will you need incentives to ensure participation and
completion of the program?

Explain the ethical, legal, and economic factors that impact
the health and wellness of the population. For example:

The ethical considerations (such as justice,
non-malfeasance, and duty) that can affect preventative care and health
promotion.

Local laws, federal laws, and the Affordable Health Care Act
that can affect preventative care and health promotion.

The potential economic impact of clinical prevention and
health promotion related to health disparities of your population.

The format for this assessment should be a professional
proposal. If possible, ask about the format used for proposals in your
organization and follow that. Follow APA formatting for your in-text citations
and references.

A Sample Answer For the Assignment: BSN- FP 4010 demonstrating the need for a health promotion and disease prevention initiative for the population

Title: BSN- FP 4010 demonstrating the need for a health promotion and disease prevention initiative for the population

BSN- FP 4010 demonstrating the need for a health promotion and disease prevention initiative for the population Grading Rubric Guidelines

Performance Category	10	9	8	4	0
Scholarliness Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic decisions.	Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry clearly stating how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions Evaluates literature resources to develop a comprehensive analysis or synthesis. Uses valid, relevant, and reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion	Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry but does not clearly state how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions. Evaluates information from source(s) to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis. Uses some valid, relevant, reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion.	Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions. Information is taken from source(s) with some interpretation/evaluation, but not enough to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis. Little valid, relevant, or reliable outside sources are used to contribute to the threaded discussion. Demonstrates little or no understanding of the topic.	Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions. Information is taken from source(s) without any interpretation/evaluation. The posting uses information that is not valid, relevant, or reliable	No evidence of the use of scholarly inquiry to inform or change professional or academic decisions. Information is not valid, relevant, or reliable
Performance Category	10	9	8	4	0
Application of Course Knowledge – Demonstrate the ability to analyze, synthesize, and/or apply principles and concepts learned in the course lesson and outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations	Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources; Applies concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life.	Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources. Applies concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life Interactions with classmates are relevant to the discussion topic but do not make direct reference to lesson content	Posts are generally on topic but do not build knowledge by incorporating concepts and principles from the lesson. Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life Does not demonstrate a solid understanding of the principles and concepts presented in the lesson	Posts do not adequately address the question posed either by the discussion prompt or the instructor’s launch post. Posts are superficial and do not reflect an understanding of the lesson content Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life	Posts are not related to the topics provided by the discussion prompt or by the instructor; attempts by the instructor to redirect the student are ignored No discussion of lesson concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life
Performance Category	5	4	3	2	0
Interactive Dialogue Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days. *(5 points possible per graded thread)*	Exceeds minimum post requirements Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts three or more times in each graded thread, over three separate days. Replies to a post posed by faculty and to a peer Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week.	Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days Replies to a question posed by a peer Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week.	Meets expectations of 2 posts on 2 different days. The main post is not made by the Wednesday deadline Does not reply to a question posed by a peer or faculty	Has only one post for the week Discussion posts contain few, if any, new ideas or applications; often are a rehashing or summary of other students’ comments	Does not post to the thread No connections are made to the topic
	Minus 1 Point	Minus 2 Point	Minus 3 Point	Minus 4 Point	Minus 5 Point
Grammar, Syntax, APA Note: if there are only a few errors in these criteria, please note this for the student in as an area for improvement. If the student does not make the needed corrections in upcoming weeks, then points should be deducted. Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing. The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition	2-3 errors in APA format. Written responses have 2-3 grammatical, spelling, and punctuation errors. Writing style is generally clear, focused, and facilitates communication.	4-5 errors in APA format. Writing responses have 4-5 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors. Writing style is somewhat focused.	6-7 errors in APA format. Writing responses have 6-7 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors. Writing style is slightly focused making discussion difficult to understand.	8-10 errors in APA format. Writing responses have 8-10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors. Writing style is not focused, making discussion difficult to understand.	Post contains greater than 10 errors in APA format. Written responses have more than 10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors. Writing style does not facilitate communication. The student continues to make repeated mistakes in any of the above areas after written correction by the instructor
	0 points lost				-5 points lost
Total Participation Requirements *per discussion thread*	The student answers the threaded discussion question or topic on one day and posts a second response on another day.				The student does not meet the minimum requirement of two postings on two different days
Early Participation Requirement *per discussion thread*	The student must provide a substantive answer to the graded discussion question(s) or topic(s), posted by the course instructor (not a response to a peer), by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT of each week.				The student does not meet the requirement of a substantive response to the stated question or topic by Wednesday at 11:59 pm MT.