BIOT 670s Biotechnology capstone
BIOT 670s Biotechnology capstone
ASSESSMENT SCORE OVERVIEW HIGHEST TOTAL SCORE POSSIBLE = 3 An assessment score of 1 indicates the solution is not an idea solution, is very complicated to implement and or will have minimal impact. A score of 3 indicates this solution is ideal and satisfies the goal of that criteria Weight Assessment Score 1 (solution is not a good fit) to 3 (solution is an ideal fit) Total Score 1. Kill log 2 or less (0-99%); 2. Kill Log 3-4 (99.9-99.99%); 3. Kill Log 5-6 (99.999 99.9999%) 20% 3 0.6 1: Solution is limited in it’s efficacy against most of the potential agents 2: Solution is effective against a majority of potential agents 3. Solution is effective against all potential agents 20% 3 0.6 15% 3 0.45 Category Assessment Criteria Description Assessment Score 1 Kill Log Takes into consideration the amount of biological agent inactivated or killed during the decontamination process. 2 Impact on Agent Resilience Takes into consideration agent resiliency in terms of stability, persistency in various environments, and resilience to current decontamination methods Evidence 3 Ease of Use 1: Solution take notable amount of Takes into consideration how easy time/equipment/skills to utilize 2: Solution take the solution is to use. Are there minimal time/equipment/skills to utilize 3: additional processes needed to Solution requires minimal to no additional prep or use the solution (i.e. vortex, equipment/skills other resources to be utilized (i. ice, water) e. is a solo solution) 4 Energy Requirements Takes into consideration if the solution requires electricity, the power source (battery, direct plug into circuit, etc), how much energy the solution requires, and the amount of time the solution requires the energy source. 1:Source will require an addtional energy source on top of what is provided. 2: Solution requires maximum energy source. 3: Solution requires no electrical source. 15% 3 0.45 5 Storage Considerations Takes into consideration the amount of space the base solution will occupy and any additional storage requirement for materials to run it (e.x. water, fuel, etc) 1. Solution + materials occupy space significantly greater than [dimension]; 2. Solution + materials occupy space equaling [dimension]; 3. Solution + materials occupy less space than [dimensions] 10% 3 0.3 6 Availability of Solution Takes into consideration if the solution is currently available, in development and almost ready for commercialization or something that is in the early phases of development 1: Solution is in the early phases of development and will not be available for 5-10 years 2: Solution is in development and almost ready for commercialization or available in a RUO format 3: Solution is readily available and there would be adequate long-term supply 5% 3 0.15 7 Post-Treatment Considerations 5% 3 0.15 8 Logistics 5% 3 0.15 9 Cost 5% 3 0.15 1:Solution requires atleast 2 or more supporting components/dependent on other material (ie, equipment, material); and may require a secondary process for decontamination or inactivation. 2:Solution requries one addtional compoent. 3: Solution requries a minimum of one material that provides desire impact. Takes in consideration addtional 1:Solution requires significant supporting maintenance for solutions in materials. 2:Solution requries a moderate amount relation to quanitiy of materials for of supporting materials. 3:Solution requires each cycle. minimal amount of supporting materials 1:Solution requires continued purchase of Takes into consideration intial cost materials and costs over $1M in fiscal year 2: of solution or technology, the cost Solution is greater than $250,000 but less than of addtional materials required, $500,000 per year. 3: Solution is less than and total cost of 24h mission $250,000 per year. Takes in consideration if the solution is a ‘one size fits all’, does it do containment and decontamination vs something that requires addtional steps after mission is completed. Add in maintenance criteria to this section Total 100% 27 Highlight this assessment score, we may want more variation since the criteria is weighted so heavily 3
| Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | ||
| Main Postinga | 45 (45%) – 50 (50%)
Answers all parts of the discussion question(s) expectations with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.
Supported by at least three current, credible sources.
Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
40 (40%) – 44 (44%)
Responds to the discussion question(s) and is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth.
Supported by at least three credible sources.
Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
35 (35%) – 39 (39%)
Responds to some of the discussion question(s).
One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed.
Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.
Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
Post is cited with two credible sources.
Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors.
Contains some APA formatting errors. |
0 (0%) – 34 (34%)
Does not respond to the discussion question(s) adequately.
Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria.
Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.
Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
Contains only one or no credible sources.
Not written clearly or concisely.
Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors.
Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
|
| Main Post: Timeliness | 10 (10%) – 10 (10%)
Posts main post by day 3. |
0 (0%) – 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Does not post by day 3. |
|
| First Response | 17 (17%) – 18 (18%)
Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.
Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.
Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.
Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
15 (15%) – 16 (16%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.
Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
13 (13%) – 14 (14%)
Response is on topic and may have some depth.
Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.
Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.
Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited. |
0 (0%) – 12 (12%)
Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.
Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.
Responses to faculty questions are missing.
No credible sources are cited. |
|
| Second Response | 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.
Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.
Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.
Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.
Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
12 (12%) – 13 (13%)
Response is on topic and may have some depth.
Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.
Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.
Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited. |
0 (0%) – 11 (11%)
Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.
Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.
Responses to faculty questions are missing.
No credible sources are cited. |
|
| Participation | 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Meets requirements for participation by posting on three different days. |
0 (0%) – 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Does not meet requirements for participation by posting on 3 different days. |
|
| Total Points: 100 | |||||