BIOL 181 APUS Week 5 Bilogy Solar Urticaria Disease Outline

Description

Assignment Instructions: To help you complete Assignment #3: Final Presentation, you will first submit an outline to organize your thoughts and main points. Your Outline should be formatted in the specified way and must contain the following elements described below.

Be sure to add your name and course number to your Outline.

The Outline Format: Your Outline must be formatted as described and demonstrated by the example linked above – an alphanumeric outline created with MS Word saved as a .doc or .docx file type only. Please note that this format will be assessed in your grade:

Use an alphanumeric sequence
Sections should be indented and aligned
Follow the suggested order of the required topics/subtopics
Use brief but detailed and descriptive phrases (e.g., pain and stiffness in joints, decreased range of motion, swelling, tenderness)

The Outline Content: Your Outline should contain the following topics/subtopics in this order. Also, remember that your Final Presentation (Assignment #3) should only be 10-15 slides, so you need to be concise and clear with your information.

I. Introduction Section – this section must contain the following:

A. Topic selection and reason for selecting

B. Thoroughly define the disease/condition

C. History of the disease/condition

D. Relevant image of the disease/condition

II. Content Sections – this section must contain the following four main topics (the subtopics are recommendations to use if appropriate to your disease/condition):

A. Statistics/Epidemiology

1. Statistical prevalence (e.g., overall, gender, age)

2. Types of determinants (e.g., risk factors)

B. Costs

1. Costs to the individual/family (e.g., mental, physical, emotional)

2. Possible costs to society (dollar figures)

3. Loss of productivity in the workforce

C. Anatomy & Physiology/Etiology

1. Which parts of the body are affected [e.g., tissue(s), organ(s), and/or organ system(s)]

2. Description of the normal structure and function of affected body parts

3. How the disease/condition changes the normal structure and function of affected body parts

4. Cause(s) of the disease/condition

D. Diagnosis/Treatments/Prognosis

1. How this disease/condition is diagnosed (e.g., history, exam, diagnostic imaging, labs)

2. How the disease/condition is treated (e.g., traditional medical treatments, alternative methods of treatment)

3. The prediction (prognosis) of this disease/condition’s outcome (e.g., life expectancy, if treated, vs. untreated)

III. Conclusion Slide – this section must contain four to six bulleted points that sum up all of the main topics/subtopics (statistics/epidemiology, costs, anatomy & physiology/etiology, diagnosis/treatments/prognosis) from the body of your presentation.

IV. Reference Section

Include a final “References” list of a minimum of five (and no more than 10) academically and scientifically credible sources used for facts shared in your Outline. (Not including images or other media.)

BIOL181 Annotated Bibliography Name: DeMarcus Wilkins Course Number: BIOL181 Presentation Topic (Medical Disease/Condition): SOLAR URTICARIA Source #1 Reference (in APA format) Summary Evaluation Harris BW, Crane JS, Schlessinger J. Solar Urticaria. [Updated 2022 Sep 27]. In:StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2022 Jan-. Availablefrom: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK441986/ This article written by Blair Harris, Jonathan Crane, and Joel Schlessingerprovides a clear description of the rare disease, along with objectives surrounding thedisease. Solar Urticaria makes up less than 0.5 percent of urticaria cases and 7 percentof photodermatosis cases. While the pathophysiology is not entirely understood it isknown the immediate hypersensitivity reaction does occur after exposure to the sun.Symptoms of solar urticaria can mimic other photodematoses such as polymorphouslight eruption, lupus erythematosus, drug-induced photosensitivity, and photo contactdermatitis. However, solar urticaria may be associated with other photodermatoses,such as polymorphous light eruption and porphyria cutanea tarda. Solar urticaria isconfirmed by photo testing using UVB and UVA visible light sources. There are noguidelines for the treatment of solar urticaria, but sun avoidance is mostlyrecommended, using a sunscreen with high SPF, and wearing dark clothing are alsohighly recommended. The article regarding solar urticaria is published online on the National Library of medicine. Article was written by Blair Harris, Jonathan Crane, and Joel Schlessinger. All three have affiliations with Pacific Northwest University and Sampson Regional Medical Center at Campbell University. Using multiple references from other doctors research the three doctors in the article were able to use the research to simplify findings thus far. Article was last updated September 27, 2022. Research behind this rare disease is still ongoing even with recent findings. American Public University System December 2021 Source #2 Reference (in APA format) Summary Evaluation American Public University System December 2021

Grid View

	Excellent	Good	Fair	Poor
Main Postinga	45 (45%) – 50 (50%) Answers all parts of the discussion question(s) expectations with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources. Supported by at least three current, credible sources. Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.	40 (40%) – 44 (44%) Responds to the discussion question(s) and is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth. Supported by at least three credible sources. Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.	35 (35%) – 39 (39%) Responds to some of the discussion question(s). One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed. Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis. Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. Post is cited with two credible sources. Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors. Contains some APA formatting errors.	0 (0%) – 34 (34%) Does not respond to the discussion question(s) adequately. Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria. Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis. Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. Contains only one or no credible sources. Not written clearly or concisely. Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors. Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style.
Main Post: Timeliness	10 (10%) – 10 (10%) Posts main post by day 3.	0 (0%) – 0 (0%)	0 (0%) – 0 (0%)	0 (0%) – 0 (0%) Does not post by day 3.
First Response	17 (17%) – 18 (18%) Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings. Responds fully to questions posed by faculty. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources. Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed. Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.	15 (15%) – 16 (16%) Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources. Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.	13 (13%) – 14 (14%) Response is on topic and may have some depth. Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed. Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.	0 (0%) – 12 (12%) Response may not be on topic and lacks depth. Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are missing. No credible sources are cited.
Second Response	16 (16%) – 17 (17%) Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings. Responds fully to questions posed by faculty. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources. Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed. Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.	14 (14%) – 15 (15%) Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources. Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.	12 (12%) – 13 (13%) Response is on topic and may have some depth. Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed. Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.	0 (0%) – 11 (11%) Response may not be on topic and lacks depth. Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are missing. No credible sources are cited.
Participation	5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Meets requirements for participation by posting on three different days.	0 (0%) – 0 (0%)	0 (0%) – 0 (0%)	0 (0%) – 0 (0%) Does not meet requirements for participation by posting on 3 different days.
Total Points: 100