# BIO 500 GC Week 3 Discussion 1 What is the significance of the frequency histogram illustrated by dice and numbers in “Dice Combination?”

Want create site? With Free visual composer you can do it easy.

## BIO 500 GC Week 3 Discussion 1 What is the significance of the frequency histogram illustrated by dice and numbers in Dice Combination

BIO 500 GC Week 3 Discussion 1 What is the significance of the frequency histogram illustrated by dice and numbers in “Dice Combination?”

It is time to relate the rules and concepts of probability to the practice of statistics and experimentation. Sampling distributions provide the link between probabilities and data. Recall that the sum of the probabilities of all possible outcomes for a certain event must equal one. Because the variables representing or describing a certain event can take on a range of values, the frequency of each of those values forms a distribution of possible outcomes, each with its own probability of occurrence. View “Central Limit Theorem” (media piece). What is the significance of the frequency histogram illustrated by dice and numbers in “Dice Combination?” How does this relate to the central limit theorem provided in the media? Roll the dice, what were your odds? HINT: Click on Dice Combination in the media. If you roll the dice, you have to count the total number of two dice. There are two ways to check on your results (Refer to the instructions by clicking Instructions); click on the dice combinations and odds given in the frequency histogram and the table or click the red bar at the right side of the media piece. Explore the basic principle of probability through this media piece. Utilize the quiz to ensure that you understand these basic principles. What is the significance of probability in judgment and decision making in important aspects of health care? Explain your response with an applicable example.

Important information for writing discussion questions and participation

Hi Class,

Please read through the following information on writing a Discussion question response and participation posts.

Contact me if you have any questions.

Important information on Writing a Discussion Question

• Your response needs to be a minimum of 150 words (not including your list of references)
• There needs to be at least TWO references with ONE being a peer reviewed professional journal article.
• Include in-text citations in your response
• Do not include quotes—instead summarize and paraphrase the information
• Points will be deducted if the above is not followed

Participation –replies to your classmates or instructor

• A minimum of 6 responses per week, on at least 3 days of the week.
• Each response needs at least ONE reference with citations—best if it is a peer reviewed journal article
• Each response needs to be at least 75 words in length (does not include your list of references)
• Responses need to be substantive by bringing information to the discussion or further enhance the discussion. Responses of “I agree” or “great post” does not count for the word count.
• Points will be deducted if the above is not followed

Welcome to class

Hello class and welcome to the class and I will be your instructor for this course. This is a -week course and requires a lot of time commitment, organization, and a high level of dedication. Please use the class syllabus to guide you through all the assignments required for the course. I have also attached the classroom policies to this announcement to know your expectations for this course. Please review this document carefully and ask me any questions if you do. You could email me at any time or send me a message via the “message” icon in halo if you need to contact me. I check my email regularly, so you should get a response within 24 hours. If you have not heard from me within 24 hours and need to contact me urgently, please send a follow up text to.

I strongly encourage that you do not wait until the very last minute to complete your assignments. Your assignments in weeks 4 and 5 require early planning as you would need to present a teaching plan and interview a community health provider. I advise you look at the requirements for these assignments at the beginning of the course and plan accordingly. I have posted the YouTube link that explains all the class assignments in detail. It is required that you watch this 32-minute video as the assignments from week 3 through 5 require that you follow the instructions to the letter to succeed. Failure to complete these assignments according to instructions might lead to a zero. After watching the video, please schedule a one-on-one with me to discuss your topic for your project by the second week of class. Use this link to schedule a 15-minute session. Please, call me at the time of your appointment on my number. Please note that I will NOT call you.

Please, be advised I do NOT accept any assignments by email. If you are having technical issues with uploading an assignment, contact the technical department and inform me of the issue. If you have any issues that would prevent you from getting your assignments to me by the deadline, please inform me to request a possible extension. Note that working fulltime or overtime is no excuse for late assignments. There is a 5%-point deduction for every day your assignment is late. This only applies to approved extensions. Late assignments will not be accepted.

If you think you would be needing accommodations due to any reasons, please contact the appropriate department to request accommodations.

Plagiarism is highly prohibited. Please ensure you are citing your sources correctly using APA 7th edition. All assignments including discussion posts should be formatted in APA with the appropriate spacing, font, margin, and indents. Any papers not well formatted would be returned back to you, hence, I advise you review APA formatting style. I have attached a sample paper in APA format and will also post sample discussion responses in subsequent announcements.

Your initial discussion post should be a minimum of 200 words and response posts should be a minimum of 150 words. Be advised that I grade based on quality and not necessarily the number of words you post. A minimum of TWO references should be used for your initial post. For your response post, you do not need references as personal experiences would count as response posts. If you however cite anything from the literature for your response post, it is required that you cite your reference. You should include a minimum of THREE references for papers in this course. Please note that references should be no more than 5 years old except recommended as a resource for the class. Furthermore, for each discussion board question, you need ONE initial substantive response and TWO substantive responses to either your classmates or your instructor for a total of THREE responses. There are TWO discussion questions each week, hence, you need a total minimum of SIX discussion posts for each week. I usually post a discussion question each week. You could also respond to these as it would count towards your required SIX discussion posts for the week.

BIO 500 GC Week 3 Discussion 1 What is the significance of the frequency histogram illustrated by dice and numbers in Dice Combination

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS:BIO 500 GC Week 3 Discussion 1 What is the significance of the frequency histogram illustrated by dice and numbers in “Dice Combination?”

I understand this is a lot of information to cover in 5 weeks, however, the Bible says in Philippians 4:13 that we can do all things through Christ that strengthens us. Even in times like this, we are encouraged by God’s word that we have that ability in us to succeed with His strength. I pray that each and every one of you receives strength for this course and life generally as we navigate through this pandemic that is shaking our world today. Relax and enjoy the course!

Exit

 Grid View
 List View
Excellent
Point range: 90–100

Good
Point range: 80–89

Fair
Point range: 70–79

Poor
Point range: 0–69

Introduction to the case (1
page)
Briefly explain and summarize
the case for this Assignment.
Be sure to include the specific
patient factors that may impact

prescribing medication for this
patient.

9 (9%) – 10 (10%)
The response accurately, clearly,
and fully summarizes in detail the
case for the Assignment.
The response accurately and
clearly explains in detail the
specific patient factors that
impact decision making when
prescribing medication for this
patient.

8 (8%) – 8 (8%)
The response accurately
summarizes the case for the
Assignment.
The response accurately explains
the specific patient factors that
impact decision making with
prescribing medication for this
patient.

7 (7%) – 7 (7%)
The response inaccurately or
vaguely summarizes the case for
the Assignment.
The response inaccurately or

vaguely explains the specific
patient factors that impact
decision making with prescribing
medication for this patient.

0 (0%) – 6 (6%)
The response inaccurately and
vaguely summarizes the case for
the Assignment, or is missing.
The response inaccurately and
vaguely explains the specific
patient factors that impact
decision making with prescribing
medication for this patient.

Decision #1 (1–2 pages)
• Which decision did you
select?
• Why did you select this
decision? Be specific and
clinically relevant and patient-
specific resources, including
the primary literature.
• Why did you not select the

18 (18%) – 20 (20%)
The response accurately and
clearly explains in detail the

decision selected.
The response accurately and
clearly explains in detail why the
decision was selected, with
specific clinically relevant
resources that fully support the
decision selected.

16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
The response accurately explains
the decision selected.
The response explains why the
decision was selected, with
specific clinically relevant
resources that support the
decision selected.
The response accurately explains

14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
The response inaccurately or
vaguely explains the decision
selected.
The response inaccurately or
vaguely explains why the
decision was selected, with
specific clinically relevant
resources that inaccurately or
vaguely support the decision

0 (0%) – 13 (13%)
The response inaccurately and
vaguely explains the decision
selected.
The response inaccurately and
vaguely explains why the
decision was selected, with
specific clinically relevant
resources that do not support the
decision selected, or is missing.

other two options provided in
the exercise? Be specific and
clinically relevant and patient-
specific resources, including
the primary literature.
• What were you hoping to
achieve by making this
decision? Support your
response with evidence and
references to the Learning
Resources (including the
primary literature).
• Explain how ethical
considerations may impact
communication with patients.
Be specific and provide

examples.

The response accurately and
clearly explains in detail why the
other two responses were not
selected, with specific clinically
relevant resources that fully
support the response.
The response accurately and
clearly explains in detail the
outcome the student was hoping
to achieve with the selected
decision, with specific clinically
relevant resources that fully
support the response.
The response accurately and
clearly explains in detail how
ethical considerations impact the
treatment plan and
communication with patients.
Examples provided fully support
the decisions and responses
provided.

why the other two responses
were not selected, with specific
clinically relevant resources that
support the response.
The response accurately explains

the outcome the student was
hoping to achieve with the
selected decision, with specific
clinically relevant resources that
support the response.
The response accurately explains
how ethical considerations
impact the treatment plan and
communication with patients.
Examples provided support the
decisions and responses
provided.

selected.
The response inaccurately or
vaguely explains why the other
two responses were not selected,
with specific clinically relevant
resources that inaccurately or
vaguely support the response.
The response inaccurately or
vaguely explains the outcome the
student was hoping to achieve
with the selected decision, with
specific clinically relevant
resources that inaccurately or
vaguely support the response.
The response inaccurately or
vaguely explains how ethical

considerations impact the
treatment plan and
communication with patients.
Examples provided may support
the decisions and responses
provided.

The response inaccurately and
vaguely explains why the other
two responses were not selected,
with specific clinically relevant
resources that do not support the
decision selected, or is missing.
The response inaccurately and
vaguely explains the outcome the
student was hoping to achieve
with the selected decision, with
specific clinically relevant
resources that do not support the
response, or is missing.
The response inaccurately and
vaguely explains how ethical
considerations impact the
treatment plan and
communication with patients, or
is missing.
Examples provided do not
support the decisions and
responses provided, or is

missing.

Decision #2 (1–2 pages)
• Which decision did you
select?
• Why did you select this
decision? Be specific and
clinically relevant and patient-
specific resources, including
the primary literature.
• Why did you not select the
other two options provided in
the exercise? Be specific and
clinically relevant and patient-
specific resources, including
the primary literature.
• What were you hoping to

18 (18%) – 20 (20%)
The response accurately and
clearly explains in detail the
decision selected.
The response accurately and
clearly explains in detail why the
decision was selected, with
specific clinically relevant
resources that fully support the

decision selected.
The response accurately and
clearly explains in detail why the
other two responses were not
selected, with specific clinically
relevant resources that fully
support the response.

16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
The response accurately explains
the decision selected.
The response explains why the
decision was selected, with
specific clinically relevant
resources that support the
decision selected.
The response accurately explains
why the other two responses
were not selected, with specific
clinically relevant resources that
support the response.
The response accurately explains
the outcome the student was

14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
The response inaccurately or
vaguely explains the decision
selected.
The response inaccurately or

vaguely explains why the
decision was selected, with
specific clinically relevant
resources that inaccurately or
vaguely support the decision
selected.
The response inaccurately or
vaguely explains why the other
two responses were not selected,
with specific clinically relevant
resources that inaccurately or

0 (0%) – 13 (13%)
The response inaccurately and
vaguely explains in detail the
decision selected.
The response inaccurately and
vaguely explains why the
decision was selected, with
specific clinically relevant
resources that do not support the
decision selected, or is missing.
The response inaccurately and
vaguely explains why the other
two responses were not selected,
with specific clinically relevant
resources that do not support the
decision selected, or is missing.

achieve by making this
decision? Support your
response with evidence and
references to the Learning
Resources (including the
primary literature).
• Explain how ethical
considerations may impact
communication with patients.
Be specific and provide
examples.

The response accurately and
clearly explains in detail the
outcome the student was hoping
to achieve with the selected
decision, with specific clinically
relevant resources that fully
support the response.
The response accurately and
clearly explains in detail how
ethical considerations impact the
treatment plan and
communication with patients.
Examples provided fully support
the decisions and responses
provided.

hoping to achieve with the
selected decision, with specific
clinically relevant resources that
support the response.
The response accurately explains
how ethical considerations
impact the treatment plan and
communication with patients.
Examples provided support the
decisions and responses
provided.

vaguely support the response.
The response inaccurately or
vaguely explains the outcome the
student was hoping to achieve
with the selected decision, with
specific clinically relevant
resources that inaccurately or
vaguely support the response.
The response inaccurately or
vaguely explains how ethical
considerations impact the
treatment plan and
communication with patients.
Examples provided may support
the decisions and responses
provided.

The response inaccurately and
vaguely explains the outcome the
student was hoping to achieve
with the selected decision, with
specific clinically relevant
resources that do not support the
response, or is missing.
The response inaccurately and
vaguely explains how ethical
considerations impact the
treatment plan and
communication with patients, or
is missing.
Examples provided do not
support the decisions and
responses provided, or is
missing.

Decision #3 (1–2 pages)
• Which decision did you
select?
• Why did you select this
decision? Be specific and
clinically relevant and patient-
specific resources, including
the primary literature.
• Why did you not select the
other two options provided in

the exercise? Be specific and
clinically relevant and patient-
specific resources, including
the primary literature.
• What were you hoping to
achieve by making this
decision? Support your
response with evidence and
references to the Learning
Resources (including the
primary literature).
• Explain how ethical

18 (18%) – 20 (20%)
The response accurately and
clearly explains in detail the
decision selected.
The response accurately and
clearly explains in detail why the
decision was selected, with
specific clinically relevant
resources that fully support the
decision selected.
The response accurately and
clearly explains in detail why the
other two responses were not
selected, with specific clinically
relevant resources that fully

support the response.
The response accurately and
clearly explains in detail the
outcome the student was hoping
to achieve with the selected
decision, with specific clinically
relevant resources that fully

16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
The response accurately explains
the decision selected.
The response explains why the
decision was selected, with
specific clinically relevant
resources that support the
decision selected.
The response accurately explains
why the other two responses
were not selected, with specific
clinically relevant resources that
support the response.
The response accurately explains
the outcome the student was
hoping to achieve with the
selected decision, with specific
clinically relevant resources that
support the response.
The response accurately explains
how ethical considerations

14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
The response inaccurately or
vaguely explains the decision
selected.
The response inaccurately or
vaguely explains why the
decision was selected, with
specific clinically relevant
resources that inaccurately or
vaguely support the decision
selected.
The response inaccurately or
vaguely explains why the other
two responses were not selected,
with specific clinically relevant
resources that inaccurately or
vaguely support the response.
The response inaccurately or
vaguely explains the outcome the
student was hoping to achieve
with the selected decision, with
specific clinically relevant

0 (0%) – 13 (13%)
The response inaccurately and
vaguely explains in detail the
decision selected.
The response inaccurately and

vaguely explains why the
decision was selected, with
specific clinically relevant
resources that do not support the
decision selected, or is missing.
The response inaccurately and
vaguely explains why the other
two responses were not selected,
with specific clinically relevant
resources that do not support the
decision selected, or is missing.
The response inaccurately and
vaguely explains the outcome the
student was hoping to achieve
with the selected decision, with
specific clinically relevant
resources that do not support the

considerations may impact
communication with patients.
Be specific and provide
examples.

support the response.
The response accurately and
clearly explains in detail how
ethical considerations impact the
treatment plan and

communication with patients.
Examples provided fully support
the decisions and responses
provided.

impact the treatment plan and
communication with patients.
Examples provided support the
decisions and responses
provided.

resources that inaccurately or
vaguely support the response.
The response inaccurately or
vaguely explains how ethical
considerations impact the
treatment plan and
communication with patients.
Examples provided may support
the decisions and responses
provided.

response, or is missing.
The response inaccurately and
vaguely explains how ethical
considerations impact the
treatment plan and
communication with patients, or
is missing.

Examples provided do not
support the decisions and
responses provided, or is
missing.

Conclusion (1 page)
• Summarize your
recommendations on the
treatment options you selected
for this patient. Be sure to
with clinically relevant and
patient-specific resources,
including the primary literature.

14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
The response accurately and
clearly summarizes in detail the
recommendations on the
treatment options selected for
this patient.
The response accurately and
clearly explains a justification for
the recommendations provided,
including clinically relevant
resources that fully support the
recommendations provided.

12 (12%) – 13 (13%)
The response accurately
summarizes the
recommendations on the
treatment options selected for
this patient.
The response accurately explains
a justification for the
recommendation provided,
including clinically relevant
resources that support the
recommendations provided.

11 (11%) – 11 (11%)
The response inaccurately or
vaguely summarizes the
recommendations on the
treatment options selected for
this patient.
The response inaccurately or
vaguely explains a justification for
the recommendations provided,
including clinically relevant
resources that inaccurately or
vaguely support the
recommendations provided.

0 (0%) – 10 (10%)
The response inaccurately and

vaguely summarizes the
recommendations on the
treatment options selected for
this patient, or is missing.
The response inaccurately and
vaguely explains a justification for
the recommendations provided,
including clinically relevant
resources that do not support the
recommendations provided, or is
missing.

Written Expression and
Formatting – Paragraph
Development and Organization:
Paragraphs make clear points
that support well-developed
ideas, flow logically, and
demonstrate continuity of
ideas. Sentences are carefully
focused—neither long and
rambling nor short and lacking
substance. A clear and
comprehensive purpose
statement and introduction are
provided that delineate all
required criteria.

5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow
writing standards for flow,
continuity, and clarity.
A clear and comprehensive
purpose statement, introduction,
and conclusion are provided that
delineate all required criteria.

4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow
writing standards for flow,
continuity, and clarity 80% of the
time.
Purpose, introduction, and
conclusion of the assignment are
stated, yet they are brief and not
descriptive.

3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow
writing standards for flow,
continuity, and clarity 60%–79%
of the time.
Purpose, introduction, and
conclusion of the assignment is
vague or off topic.

0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow

writing standards for flow,
continuity, and clarity &amp;lt; 60% of
the time.
No purpose statement,
introduction, or conclusion were
provided.

Written Expression and
Formatting – English writing
standards:
Correct grammar, mechanics,
and proper punctuation

5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Uses correct grammar, spelling,
and punctuation with no errors.

4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar,
spelling, and punctuation errors.

3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Contains several (3 or 4)
grammar, spelling, and
punctuation errors.

0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Contains many (≥ 5) grammar,
spelling, and punctuation errors

understanding.

Written Expression and
Formatting – The paper follows
correct APA format for title
spacing, margins, indentations,
page numbers, parenthetical/in-
text citations, and reference
list.

5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Uses correct APA format with no
errors.

4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Contains a few (1 or 2) APA
format errors.

3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Contains several (3 or 4) APA
format errors.

0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Contains many (≥ 5) APA format
errors.

Total Points: 100

Did you find apk for android? You can find new Free Android Games and apps.