Boost your Grades with us today!
BIO 1000 Assessment Six: Bioengineering Summary
BIO 1000 Assessment Six Bioengineering Summary
Search the Capella library or the Internet for an article
from a reputable source about a specific genetically modified organism, such as
one of the following (you are welcome to choose topics outside of this list):
Corn.
Potato.
Soy.
Dairy.
Cotton.
Canola oil.
Papaya.
Sugar.
Animal feed.
Salmon.
Golden rice.
Squash.
Sugar beets.
Potato.
Insulin.
Vaccines.
Growth hormones.
Follicle stimulating hormone.
Erythropoietin.
Read the article and write a summary of its contents.
Address all of the following in your summary:
What article did you read? Why did you choose this article?
What are the main points presented in the article? What message
is the author trying to communicate?
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: BIO 1000 Assessment Six: Bioengineering Summary
What is gene of interest (being modified) and what is the
purpose of this gene? Which organism is the gene inserted into, and what is the
intended result of expressing this gene?
How are microorganisms that normally affect the immune
system, such as bacteria or viruses, used beneficially as tools in
biotechnology?
What are the pros and cons of this technology?
What do other sources of information say about the same
concepts presented in the article? Are there discrepancies between the
information in the article and that from other sources?
Where in your life (or in the life of a friend or family
member) might the application of this form of biotechnology apply?
Your article should be from a reputable source and should
meet all of the checklist items in the Source Evaluation Form. Complete an
evaluation of your article, using the appropriate Source Evaluation Form
(linked in the Resources under the Capella Resources heading). Download the
form and answer the questions.
Formatting Requirements
Written communication: Written communication should be free
of errors that detract from the overall message.
APA formatting: References and citations should be formatted
according to APA (6th edition) style and formatting.
Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12-point.
Format: Either submit both the bioengineering paper and the
completed Source Evaluation Form, or write a paragraph in your paper addressing
the questions from the form.
BIO 1000 Assessment Six Bioengineering Summary Grading Rubric
Performance Category | 100% or highest level of performance
100% 16 points |
Very good or high level of performance
88% 14 points |
Acceptable level of performance
81% 13 points |
Inadequate demonstration of expectations
68% 11 points |
Deficient level of performance
56% 9 points
|
Failing level
of performance 55% or less 0 points |
Total Points Possible= 50 | 16 Points | 14 Points | 13 Points | 11 Points | 9 Points | 0 Points |
Scholarliness
Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic topics. |
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three or more of the following elements
|
16 Points | 14 Points | 13 Points | 11 Points | 9 Points | 0 Points | |
Application of Course Knowledge
Demonstrate the ability to analyze and apply principles, knowledge and information learned in the outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations |
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three of the following elements
|
10 Points | 9 Points | 6 Points | 0 Points | |||
Interactive Dialogue
Initial post should be a minimum of 300 words (references do not count toward word count) The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each (references do not count toward word count) Responses are substantive and relate to the topic. |
Demonstrated all of the following:
|
Demonstrated 3 of the following:
|
Demonstrated 2 of the following:
|
Demonstrated 1 or less of the following:
|
||
8 Points | 7 Points | 6 Points | 5 Points | 4 Points | 0 Points | |
Grammar, Syntax, APA
Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing. The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition Error is defined to be a unique APA error. Same type of error is only counted as one error. |
The following was present:
AND
AND
|
The following was present:
AND/OR
AND/OR
|
The following was present:
AND/OR
AND/OR
|
The following was present:
AND/OR
AND/OR
|
The following was present:
AND/OR
AND/OR
AND/OR
|
The following was present:
AND/OR
AND/OR
|
0 Points Deducted | 5 Points Lost | |||||
Participation
Requirements |
Demonstrated the following:
|
Failed to demonstrate the following:
|
||||
0 Points Lost | 5 Points Lost | |||||
Due Date Requirements | Demonstrated all of the following:
A minimum of one peer and one instructor responses are to be posted within the course no later than Sunday, 11:59 pm MT. |
Demonstrates one or less of the following.
A minimum of one peer and one instructor responses are to be posted within the course no later than Sunday, 11:59 pm MT. |