Boost your Grades with us today!
Benchmark Assignment – Organizational and Personal HR Development Plan
Benchmark Assignment – Organizational and Personal HR Development Plan
Assessment Description
Throughout this course, you have had the opportunity to understand the important role human resources has as a strategic business partner and to reflect on the role of HR within your respective organizations. For this presentation, you will be capturing the key findings learned in this course, including making recommendations to your company leadership team.
Create a 10-12 slide PowerPoint presentation, then record your narrated presentation using a screen recording tool such as Loom, Vimeo, or Screencast-O-Matic. Once recorded, place the link to your recorded presentation on the cover slide of your PowerPoint. Submit your PowerPoint presentation with your embedded link.
Your presentation should include the following:
- Develop a synopsis of your outcomes for acquiring, developing, training, and leveraging on human capital within your organization. Examine the pros and cons to the current systems or processes being used.
- Based on the immediate hiring and training needs within the company, how can the company focus on the employees’ current strengths (knowledge, skills, abilities, and experiences) to leverage diversity to improve performance outcomes?
- Propose plans for developing and integrating the positions of HR specialist or generalist, HR leadership, HR consultant, or HR of One within the organization.
- What recommendations would you make to the leadership of your company relative to making sound decisions when acquiring, developing, and leveraging resources (i.e., human talent, technology, knowledge management) to meet organizational needs while staying legally compliant with employment practices?
- Based on the knowledge gained in this course, how will you apply what has been learned into your organization? As a human resource professional, describe the elements of your personal development plan within the field of HR.
APA format is not required, but solid academic writing is expected.
This assignment uses a rubric. Review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.
Benchmark Information:
This benchmark assignment assesses the following programmatic competencies:
MS-Ldr-No Emphasis
2.2 Analyze people’s strengths in order to leverage diversity to improve performance outcomes.
MPA-Health Care Mgmt; MPA-Govt and Policy; MPA-Non-Profit Mgmt
2.3 Make sound decisions involving personnel based on labor law, the needs of the organization, and available resources.
Rubric Criteria
Total150 points
Criterion | 1. Unsatisfactory | 2. Less than Satisfactory | 3. Satisfactory | 4. Good | 5. Excellent |
Layout
Layout |
0 points
The layout is cluttered, confusing, and does not use spacing, headings, and subheadings to enhance the readability. The text is extremely difficult to read with long blocks of text, small point size for fonts, and inappropriate contrasting colors. Poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or bold formatting is evident. |
11.1 points
The layout shows some structure but appears cluttered and busy or distracting with large gaps of white space or a distracting background. Overall readability is difficult due to lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts, dark or busy background, overuse of bold, or lack of appropriate indentations of text. |
11.85 points
The layout background and text complement each other and enable the content to be easily read. The fonts are easy to read and point size varies appropriately for headings and text. |
13.05 points
The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space appropriately. Sometimes the fonts are easy to read, but in a few places the use of fonts, italics, bold, long paragraphs, color, or busy background detracts and does not enhance readability. |
15 points
The layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall message with appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and white space. Text is appropriate in length for the target audience and to the point. The background and colors enhance the readability of the text. |
Synopsis of Outcomes
Synopsis of Outcomes |
0 points
Synopsis of outcomes is not included. |
5.55 points
Synopsis of outcomes for acquiring, developing, training, and leveraging on human capital within the organization lacks details. There is a vague examination of the pros and cons to the current systems or processes being used. |
5.93 points
Synopsis of outcomes for acquiring, developing, training, and leveraging on human capital within the organization has minimal detail. There is a simple examination of the pros and cons to the current systems or processes being used. |
6.53 points
Synopsis of outcomes for acquiring, developing, training, and leveraging on human capital within the organization has adequate detail. There is a clear examination of the pros and cons to the current systems or processes being used. |
7.5 points
There is a comprehensive synopsis of the outcomes for acquiring, developing, training, and leveraging on human capital within the organization. There is a clear examination of the pros and cons to the current systems or processes being used. |
Application of Knowledge Gained
Application of Knowledge Gained |
0 points
There is no discussion of how the knowledge gained from this course will be applied in the organization. |
5.55 points
The discussion of how the knowledge gained from this course will be applied in the organization is insufficient. |
5.93 points
The discussion of how the knowledge gained from this course will be applied in the organization is ambiguous. |
6.53 points
The discussion of how the knowledge gained from this course will be applied in the organization is detailed and descriptive. |
7.5 points
The discussion of how the knowledge gained from this course will be applied in the organization is clear and insightful. |
Mechanics of Writing
Includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use. |
0 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. |
5.55 points
Slide errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. |
5.93 points
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. |
6.53 points
Slides are largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. |
7.5 points
Writer is clearly in control of standard, written, academic English. |
Documentation of Sources
Includes citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc. as appropriate to assignment and style. |
0 points
Sources are not documented. |
5.55 points
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. |
5.93 points
Sources are documented as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. |
6.53 points
Sources are documented as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. |
7.5 points
Sources are completely and correctly documented as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. |
Language Use and Audience Awareness
Includes sentence construction, word choice, etc. |
0 points
Inappropriate word choice and lack of variety in language use are evident. Writer appears to be unaware of audience. Use of primer prose indicates writer either does not apply figures of speech or uses them inappropriately. |
11.1 points
Some distracting inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. The writer exhibits some lack of control in using figures of speech appropriately. |
11.85 points
Language is appropriate to the targeted audience for the most part. |
13.05 points
The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of speech, and word choice in distinctive and creative ways that are appropriate to purpose, discipline, and scope. |
15 points
The writer is clearly aware of audience, uses a variety of appropriate vocabulary for the targeted audience, and uses figures of speech to communicate clearly. |
Recommendations to the Leadership (B)
Recommendations to the Leadership (C. 2.3) |
0 points
There is no mention of recommendations for the leadership team. |
11.1 points
The recommendations for the leadership of the company relative to making sound decisions to meet organizational needs while staying legally compliant with employment practices are irrelevant. |
11.85 points
The recommendations for the leadership of the company relative to making sound decisions to meet organizational needs while staying legally compliant with employment practices are overly simplistic. |
13.05 points
The recommendations for the leadership of the company relative to making sound decisions to meet organizational needs while staying legally compliant with employment practices are relevant. |
15 points
The recommendations for the leadership of the company relative to making sound decisions to meet organizational needs while staying legally compliant with employment practices are substantial. |
Presentation of Content
Presentation of Content |
0 points
The content lacks a clear point of view and logical sequence of information. Presentation includes little persuasive information. Sequencing of ideas is unclear. |
33.3 points
The content is vague in conveying a point of view and does not create a strong sense of purpose. Presentation includes some persuasive information. |
35.55 points
The presentation slides are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization and/or in their relationships to each other. |
39.15 points
The content is written with a logical progression of ideas and supporting information, exhibiting a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Presentation includes persuasive information from reliable sources. |
45 points
The content is written clearly and concisely. Ideas universally progress and relate to each other. The project includes motivating questions and advanced organizers. The project gives the audience a clear sense of the main idea. |
Professionalism
Professionalism |
0 points
Not addressed. |
5.55 points
Appearance or manner within the video is unprofessional; or the video is taken within a distracting environment or background. |
5.93 points
Appearance or manner within the video are lacking some degree of professionalism; or the video includes some distraction in the environment or background. |
6.53 points
Appearance and manner exhibit adequate professionalism within the video. The video is taken within an environment relatively free of distraction. |
7.5 points
Appearance and manner exhibit appropriate professionalism within the video. The video is taken within an environment totally free of distraction. |
Proposed Plans
Proposed Plans |
0 points
There is no mention of proposed plans for developing and integrating the different HR positions. |
5.55 points
Proposed plans for developing and integrating the different HR positions are incomplete or incomprehensive. |
5.93 points
Proposed plans for developing and integrating the different HR positions are somewhat comprehensible. |
6.53 points
Proposed plans for developing and integrating the different HR positions are complete and comprehensible. |
7.5 points
Proposed plans for developing and integrating the different HR positions are detailed and thorough. |
Employee’s Current Strengths (B)
Employee’s Current Strengths (C 2.2) |
0 points
There is no explanation of how the company can focus on the employee’s current strengths to leverage diversity to improve performance outcomes. |
11.1 points
There is a vague explanation of how the company can focus on the employee’s current strengths to leverage diversity to improve performance outcomes. |
11.85 points
There is a thorough explanation of how the company can focus on the employee’s current strengths to leverage diversity to improve performance outcomes. |
13.05 points
There is a minimally detailed explanation of how the company can focus on the employee’s current strengths to leverage diversity to improve performance outcomes. |
15 points
There is a detailed explanation of how the company can focus on the employee’s current strengths to leverage diversity to improve performance outcomes. |
Grading Rubric
Performance Category | 100% or highest level of performance
100% 16 points |
Very good or high level of performance
88% 14 points |
Acceptable level of performance
81% 13 points |
Inadequate demonstration of expectations
68% 11 points |
Deficient level of performance
56% 9 points
|
Failing level
of performance 55% or less 0 points |
Total Points Possible= 50 | 16 Points | 14 Points | 13 Points | 11 Points | 9 Points | 0 Points |
Scholarliness
Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic topics. |
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three or more of the following elements
|
16 Points | 14 Points | 13 Points | 11 Points | 9 Points | 0 Points | |
Application of Course Knowledge
Demonstrate the ability to analyze and apply principles, knowledge and information learned in the outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations |
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three of the following elements
|
10 Points | 9 Points | 6 Points | 0 Points | |||
Interactive Dialogue
Initial post should be a minimum of 300 words (references do not count toward word count) The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each (references do not count toward word count) Responses are substantive and relate to the topic. |
Demonstrated all of the following:
|
Demonstrated 3 of the following:
|
Demonstrated 2 of the following:
|
Demonstrated 1 or less of the following:
|
||
8 Points | 7 Points | 6 Points | 5 Points | 4 Points | 0 Points | |
Grammar, Syntax, APA
Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing. The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition Error is defined to be a unique APA error. Same type of error is only counted as one error. |
The following was present:
AND
AND
|
The following was present:
AND/OR
AND/OR
|
The following was present:
AND/OR
AND/OR
|
The following was present:
AND/OR
AND/OR
|
The following was present:
AND/OR
AND/OR
AND/OR
|
The following was present:
AND/OR
AND/OR
|
0 Points Deducted | 5 Points Lost | |||||
Participation
Requirements |
Demonstrated the following:
|
Failed to demonstrate the following:
|
||||
0 Points Lost | 5 Points Lost | |||||
Due Date Requirements | Demonstrated all of the following:
A minimum of one peer and one instructor responses are to be posted within the course no later than Sunday, 11:59 pm MT. |
Demonstrates one or less of the following.
A minimum of one peer and one instructor responses are to be posted within the course no later than Sunday, 11:59 pm MT. |
Also Read: DNP-815A Topic 8 DQ 2 Explore various science-based theories