Assignment: Social Networking: Advantages and Disadvantages

Assignment: Social Networking: Advantages and Disadvantages

Assignment  Social Networking  Advantages and Disadvantages

Social networking plays a fundamental role in the lives of career professionals and job hunters. Gathering information about job opportunities sees job seekers employing the usage of job sites, networking, and employment opportunities. However, it is social networking that has been preferred by job seekers owing to its popularity and good reviews from different quarters. Career professionals have also preferred leveraging social networking to climb the professional ladder. The present paper will thus examine the advantages and disadvantages of adopting social networking by analyzing specific social networking media.

health care providers

Advantages of Social Networking

            According to the social network theory, the fact that the actors are embedded in an interconnected association that provides them with opportunities forms part of the central premise of the concept (Hoye, van Hooft, & Lievens, 2009). Social networking also allows people to build relationships that allow them to not only enjoy job opportunities, but also get to use the influence and knowledge of their mentors to solve particular issues.

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: Assignment: Social Networking: Advantages and Disadvantages

 

Social media networking has particularly become preferred by career professionals and job seekers due to its multiplicity of advantages. Facebook allows users to establish a profile premised on their work histories, interests, hobbies and pertinent information

that can enable one to get jobs or share commonalities with potential mentors (Kelly, 2010). Also, Facebook enables users to join professional groups, download job applications, and write articles related to their careers to boost their standing. Further, career professionals and job seekers can utilize LinkedIn’s unique allowance to create a profile that resembles a resume to land new jobs (Kelly, 2010). The fact that it allows users to establish professionally-oriented networks facilitates the above. As a business and career biased social media platform, LinkedIn allows its users to engage in activities related to their careers such as writing and sharing articles as well as uploading documents.

Therefore, the above social medial platforms collectively help a job seeker or a career professional to enjoy a host of advantages. Platforms such as LinkedIn helps individuals to establish a reliable business network due to its tighter controls. Moreover, a career individual can use social media platforms to solve practical challenges through their search functions. Irrespective of the platform that one utilizes, social media offers people a platform to share information that casts them in a positive light, which may help them to get jobs through recommendations (Escoffery, Kenzig, Hyden, & Hernandez, 2018). In addition to sharing information, social medial platforms such as Twitter also gives users a leeway to connecting one to their communities, which is an important part of professional development.Assignment  Social Networking  Advantages and Disadvantages

Disadvantages of Social Networking

            Nevertheless, whereas social networking has the above advantages, it also registers certain disadvantages that may make it detrimental. Hoye, van Hooft, and Lievens (2009) stipulate that social networking may mislead individuals to develop stronger social ties, which may prove detrimental according to the formalist social network paradigm. Similarly, the authors argue that social networking constricts individual behavior inasmuch as it exposes them to multiple opportunities. Moreover, social marketing using social media posts may decrease one’s chances of landing jobs or advancing in their careers due to the negative effects of addiction associated with platforms such as Facebook. As a matter of fact, potential employers or mentors may consider a person who uses social media as being unproductive, which may hamper their career chances. Also, one may become exposed to information overwhelm due to multiple sharing of retweets, YouTube videos, and Facebook posts, which may hamper the effectiveness of the platforms. The issue of privacy also arises when it comes to social networking, Social media owners have the prerogative to share too much information concerning one more that they would like to share. This may expose them to ridicule and even diminish their chances of getting employed due to certain inappropriate contents shared.

Assignment: Social Networking: Advantages and Disadvantages Conclusion

Social networking plays an integral role in the career advancement of individuals. It possesses several advantages such as establishing a reliable business network, marketing one positively, and sharing pertinent information among others. However, the advantages notwithstanding, social networking may also expose a job seeker of career professional to privacy issues and overwhelming information, which may hurt their professional chances. Thus, in order to enjoy is advantages, one needs to act carefully and use the platforms judiciously.

Assignment: Social Networking: Advantages and Disadvantages Rubric

You’ve already rated students with this rubric. Any major changes could affect their assessment results.
NURS_6002_Week_1_Discussion_Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts

Main Posting

50 to >44.0 pts

Excellent
Answers all parts of the discussion question(s) expectations with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources. … Supported by at least three current, credible sources. … Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

44 to >39.0 pts

Good
Responds to the discussion question(s) and is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. … At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth. … Supported by at least three credible sources. … Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

39 to >34.0 pts

Fair
Responds to some of the discussion question(s). … One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed. … Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis. … Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. … Post is cited with two credible sources. … Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors. … Contains some APA formatting errors.

34 to >0 pts

Poor
Does not respond to the discussion question(s) adequately. … Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria. … Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis. … Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. … Contains only one or no credible sources. … Not written clearly or concisely. … Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors. … Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style.
50 pts

Main Post: Timeliness

10 to >0.0 pts

Excellent
Posts main post by day 3.

0 pts

Poor
Does not post by day 3.
10 pts

First Response

18 to >16.0 pts

Excellent
Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings. … Responds fully to questions posed by faculty. … Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources. …Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives. … Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. … Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed. … Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

16 to >14.0 pts

Good
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings. … Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. … Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed. … Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources. … Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

14 to >12.0 pts

Fair
Response is on topic and may have some depth. … Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication. … Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed. … Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.

12 to >0 pts

Poor
Response may not be on topic and lacks depth. … Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication. … Responses to faculty questions are missing. … No credible sources are cited.
18 pts

Second Response

17 to >15.0 pts

Excellent
Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings. … Responds fully to questions posed by faculty. … Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources. … Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives. … Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. … Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed. … Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

15 to >13.0 pts

Good
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings. … Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. … Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed. … Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources. … Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

13 to >11.0 pts

Fair
Response is on topic and may have some depth. … Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication. …Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed. … Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.

11 to >0 pts

Poor
Response may not be on topic and lacks depth. … Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication. … Responses to faculty questions are missing. …No credible sources are cited.
17 pts

Participation

5 to >0.0 pts

Excellent
Meets requirements for participation by posting on three different days.

0 pts

Poor
Does not meet requirements for participation by posting on 3 different days.
5 pts
Total Points: 100