Boost your Grades with us today!
Assignment: One-Way ANOVA Essay
A Sample Answer For the Assignment: Assignment: One-Way ANOVA Essay
Title: Assignment: One-Way ANOVA Essay
Statistical tests are an essential tool used to help understand the meaning of a given dataset. Based on the statistical tests results, one can deduce whether the data obtained from a study supports the hypothesis or not. Similarly, they help in determining the credibility and inferential ability of the data collected from the sample populations in a study. Various tests serve different purposes and can only be applied depending on the nature of the data involved and the research questions to be answered. ANOVA test is commonly used to determine the correlation between given variables. The data from the grades.sav.set will be used in this study to explore further the use of ANOVA in data analysis and interpretation.
Section 1: Data File Description
The data in this study were obtained from the SPSS dataset. A teacher recorded the performance and demographic characteristics of a group of students in the class. A total of 105 students participated in the study. The variables analyzed included the section and quiz3 outcomes which were displayed in the SPSS data. The participants were divided into three groups labeled 1, 2 and 3 with each section having 33, 39 and 33 students respectively. The section variables were used as predictor variables and were measured in nominal scale. On the other hand, quiz3 variable was the outcome variable measured in ratio scale.
Section 2: Testing Assumptions
ANOVA tests are only suitable under given assumptions which must be considered when analyzed data. The first assumption for this case was that the data were independent and followed a normal distribution. Before the ANOVA test is performed, it is important to identify an assumption that may come along with the test. Secondly, it was also assumed that the data are centrally located and does not have outliers.
Figure 1.1: SPSS histogram of quiz3.
Histogram was constructed from the collected data and this would help determine whether the data followed a normal distribution or not. Furthermore, it could also be used in testing the second assumption, which was on the tendency of central location. The figure above shows that the total sample population (N) was 105 with the mean and standard deviation of 7.13 and 1.16 respectively. The findings confirm that the data follows a normal distribution and there are no outliers considering that the tails are evenly sloped. In addition, the descriptive statistics were also used in testing the study assumptions. The results indicated that the data were negatively skewed while the kurtosis was positive. However, the kurtosis value is not high and this means that there is nearly equal distribution at both the tail and the head.
Descriptive Statistics | |||||
N | Skewness | Kurtosis | |||
Statistic | Statistic | Std. Error | Statistic | Std. Error | |
quiz3 | 105 | -.078 | .236 | .149 | .467 |
Valid N (listwise) | 105 |
Figure 1.2: SPSS output of quiz3 descriptive statistics with skewness and kurtosis
As evident in the diagram above, the kurtosis and skewness values are within the acceptable limits and thus appropriate.
Tests of Normality | ||||||
Kolmogorov-Smirnov^{a} | Shapiro-Wilk | |||||
Statistic | df | Sig. | Statistic | df | Sig. | |
quiz3 | .143 | 105 | .000 | .948 | 105 | .000 |
a. Lilliefors Significance Correction |
Figure 1.3: SPSS output of the Shapiro-Wilk test results for quiz3
The test for normality was also performed and the p-value was 0.000 which is significant at p < .05. The p-value obtained is significant and thus the null hypothesis is rejected.
Test of Homogeneity of Variances | |||
quiz3 | |||
Levene Statistic | df1 | df2 | Sig. |
2.898 | 2 | 102 | .060 |
Figure 1.4: SPSS output results of the Levene test
The Levene test was used to determine the equality of variance between the variables. The results as indicated in fig 1.4 show that there is no significant violation of the homogeneity of variance considering that the Sig. is at a .060 and this is greater than .05.
Assumptions
All the assumption outlined in the study were met and thus, the tests were reliable. The reliability of the tests used in data analysis also influences the usefulness of the final results; in this case, the normality test, Shapiro-Wilk test, Levene tests, and the histogram show normal distribution and evenness of the variance between variables.
Section 3: Research Question, Hypotheses, and Alpha Level
The research questions for the study included: is there a significant variation between the mean of sore for the quiz3 among the three groups? With the research question, the formulated alternative hypothesis was that there is a significant difference in the mean score for the three groups (sections). The null hypothesis was that there is no significant difference in the mean score for the three sections. The confidence interval used in this case was 95% with the alpha critical value being 0.05.
Section 4: Interpretation
Figure 1.5: SPSS output data mean of quiz3 for each section
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: Assignment: One-Way ANOVA Essay
The above figure (fig 1.5) shows that there is a significant difference in the quiz3 score for the three sections. The highest score was recorded by section 3, followed by 1 and then 2.
Descriptives |
||||||||
quiz3 | ||||||||
N | Mean | Std. Deviation | Std. Error | 95% Confidence Interval for Mean | Minimum | Maximum | ||
Lower Bound | Upper Bound | |||||||
1 | 33 | 7.27 | 1.153 | .201 | 6.86 | 7.68 | 5 | 10 |
2 | 39 | 6.33 | 1.611 | .258 | 5.81 | 6.86 | 2 | 10 |
3 | 33 | 7.94 | 1.560 | .272 | 7.39 | 8.49 | 6 | 10 |
Total | 105 | 7.13 | 1.600 | .156 | 6.82 | 7.44 | 2 | 10 |
Figure 1.6: SPSS output data of descriptives for quiz3 including all sections.
From the descriptive statistics above, the mean value for section 1,2 and 3 were 7.27, 6.33 and 7.94 respectively. The standard deviation value also varied from one section to another; the values obtained for section 1, 2 and 3 were 1.153, 1.611 and 1.1560 respectively. The results confirm that there is a significant variation in the quiz score among the three sections.
ANOVA | |||||
quiz3 | |||||
Sum of Squares | df | Mean Square | F | Sig. | |
Between Groups | 47.042 | 2 | 23.521 | 10.951 | .000 |
Within Groups | 219.091 | 102 | 2.148 | ||
Total | 266.133 | 104 |
Figure 1.7: SPSS output data showing ANOVA results
The ANOVA results as depicted in fig 1.7 shows that the degree of freedom for the between and within groups is 2 and 102 respectively. The total degree of freedom value is 104. The F score is 10.951 while the sig. value is .000 with the effect size of 0.5588 which is significantly small. The sig. value is 0.000 and this shows that the p-value is less than 0.05 and thus significant at the critical alpha value; therefore, the null hypothesis is rejected (George, and Mallery, 2016).
Multiple Comparisons | ||||||
Dependent Variable: quiz3 | ||||||
Tukey HSD | ||||||
(I) section | (J) section | Mean Difference (I-J) | Std. Error | Sig. | 95% Confidence Interval | |
Lower Bound | Upper Bound | |||||
1 | 2 | .939^{*} | .347 | .021 | .11 | 1.76 |
3 | -.667 | .361 | .159 | -1.52 | .19 | |
2 | 1 | -.939^{*} | .347 | .021 | -1.76 | -.11 |
3 | -1.606^{*} | .347 | .000 | -2.43 | -.78 | |
3 | 1 | .667 | .361 | .159 | -.19 | 1.52 |
2 | 1.606^{*} | .347 | .000 | .78 | 2.43 | |
*. The mean difference is significant at the 0.05 level. |
Figure 1.8: SPSS output data showing post-hoc
Furthermore, the mean comparison between the three sections was one and the post-hoc used in determining whether there is a significant difference between the groups. From the results in fig 1.8, there is a significant variation between the scores in the three sections. The variance value for section 1 compared to section 2 is 0.939 which is quite significant. Similarly, the variance value for section 2 compared to section 3 was 1.606 which is still high. The least variance value was obtained between section 1 and 3.
Assignment: One-Way ANOVA Essay Section 5: Conclusion
Finally, the ANOVA results in this study indicated that there was a significant difference in the score between the three sections. The findings from the statistical test are helpful in testing the hypotheses and thus answering the research question. In this case, the null hypothesis was rejected because the p-value obtained was significant at the critical value alpha=0.05. The performance in quiz3 varied significantly from one group to another and based on this, a further study may be conducted to explore the factors contributing to the variation in the performances.
On the other hand, in as much as the test was appropriate and helpful in answering the research questions, it was faced by limitations such as small sample size. The sample size was not adequate to fully provide an answer to the research question. Furthermore, due to the differences within the data obtained, one is required to conduct separate tests such as post-hoc to discover the significance of the data when performing an ANOVA test; this appears to be cumbersome.
As with your previous assignments, you will complete this assignment with the DAA Template. Links to additional resources are available in the Resources area.
Reminder: The format of this SPSS assignment should be narrative with supporting statistical output (table and graphs) integrated into the text in the appropriate places (not all at the end of the document).
You will analyze the following variables in the grades.sav data set:
section
quiz3
Step 1: Write Section 1 of the DAA.
Provide the context of the grades.sav data set.
Include a definition of the specified variables (predictor, outcome) and corresponding scales of measurement.
Specify the sample size of the data set.
Step 2: Write Section 2 of the DAA.
Analyze the assumptions of the one-way ANOVA.
Paste the SPSS histogram output for quiz3 and discuss your visual interpretations.
Paste SPSS descriptives output showing skewness and kurtosis values for quiz3 and interpret them.
Paste SPSS output for the Shapiro-Wilk test of quiz3 and interpret it.
Report the results of the Levene test and interpret it.
Summarize whether or not the assumptions of the one-way ANOVA are met.
Step 3: Write Section 3 of the DAA.
Specify a research question related to the one-way ANOVA.
Articulate the null hypothesis and alternative hypothesis.
Specify the alpha level.
Step 4: Write Section 4 of the DAA.
Begin by pasting SPSS output of the means plot and providing an interpretation.
Also report the means and standard deviations of quiz3 for each level of the section variable.
Next, paste the SPSS ANOVA output and report the results of the F test, including:
Degrees of freedom.
F value.
p value.
Calculated effect size.
Interpretation of the effect size.
Finally, if the omnibus F is significant, provide the SPSS post-hoc (Tukey HSD) output.
Interpret the post-hoc tests.
Step 5: Write Section 5 of the DAA.
Discuss the conclusions of the one-way ANOVA as it relates to the research question.
Conclude with an analysis of the strengths and limitations of one-way ANOVA.
Submit your DAA Template as an attached Word document in the assignment area.
Lopes Write Policy
For assignments that need to be submitted to Lopes Write, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me.
Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes.
Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own?
Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score.
Late Policy
The university’s policy on late assignments is 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies.
Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances.
If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect.
I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension.
As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading.
Communication
Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me:
Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class.
Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours.
Important information for writing discussion questions and participation
Welcome to class
Hello class and welcome to the class and I will be your instructor for this course. This is a -week course and requires a lot of time commitment, organization, and a high level of dedication. Please use the class syllabus to guide you through all the assignments required for the course. I have also attached the classroom policies to this announcement to know your expectations for this course. Please review this document carefully and ask me any questions if you do. You could email me at any time or send me a message via the “message” icon in halo if you need to contact me. I check my email regularly, so you should get a response within 24 hours. If you have not heard from me within 24 hours and need to contact me urgently, please send a follow up text to
I strongly encourage that you do not wait until the very last minute to complete your assignments. Your assignments in weeks 4 and 5 require early planning as you would need to present a teaching plan and interview a community health provider. I advise you look at the requirements for these assignments at the beginning of the course and plan accordingly. I have posted the YouTube link that explains all the class assignments in detail. It is required that you watch this 32-minute video as the assignments from week 3 through 5 require that you follow the instructions to the letter to succeed. Failure to complete these assignments according to instructions might lead to a zero. After watching the video, please schedule a one-on-one with me to discuss your topic for your project by the second week of class. Use this link to schedule a 15-minute session. Please, call me at the time of your appointment on my number. Please note that I will NOT call you.
Please, be advised I do NOT accept any assignments by email. If you are having technical issues with uploading an assignment, contact the technical department and inform me of the issue. If you have any issues that would prevent you from getting your assignments to me by the deadline, please inform me to request a possible extension. Note that working fulltime or overtime is no excuse for late assignments. There is a 5%-point deduction for every day your assignment is late. This only applies to approved extensions. Late assignments will not be accepted.
If you think you would be needing accommodations due to any reasons, please contact the appropriate department to request accommodations.
Plagiarism is highly prohibited. Please ensure you are citing your sources correctly using APA 7th edition. All assignments including discussion posts should be formatted in APA with the appropriate spacing, font, margin, and indents. Any papers not well formatted would be returned back to you, hence, I advise you review APA formatting style. I have attached a sample paper in APA format and will also post sample discussion responses in subsequent announcements.
Your initial discussion post should be a minimum of 200 words and response posts should be a minimum of 150 words. Be advised that I grade based on quality and not necessarily the number of words you post. A minimum of TWO references should be used for your initial post. For your response post, you do not need references as personal experiences would count as response posts. If you however cite anything from the literature for your response post, it is required that you cite your reference. You should include a minimum of THREE references for papers in this course. Please note that references should be no more than 5 years old except recommended as a resource for the class. Furthermore, for each discussion board question, you need ONE initial substantive response and TWO substantive responses to either your classmates or your instructor for a total of THREE responses. There are TWO discussion questions each week, hence, you need a total minimum of SIX discussion posts for each week. I usually post a discussion question each week. You could also respond to these as it would count towards your required SIX discussion posts for the week.
I understand this is a lot of information to cover in 5 weeks, however, the Bible says in Philippians 4:13 that we can do all things through Christ that strengthens us. Even in times like this, we are encouraged by God’s word that we have that ability in us to succeed with His strength. I pray that each and every one of you receives strength for this course and life generally as we navigate through this pandemic that is shaking our world today. Relax and enjoy the course!
Hi Class,
Please read through the following information on writing a Discussion question response and participation posts.
Contact me if you have any questions.
Important information on Writing a Discussion Question
- Your response needs to be a minimum of 150 words (not including your list of references)
- There needs to be at least TWO references with ONE being a peer reviewed professional journal article.
- Include in-text citations in your response
- Do not include quotes—instead summarize and paraphrase the information
- Follow APA-7th edition
- Points will be deducted if the above is not followed
Participation –replies to your classmates or instructor
- A minimum of 6 responses per week, on at least 3 days of the week.
- Each response needs at least ONE reference with citations—best if it is a peer reviewed journal article
- Each response needs to be at least 75 words in length (does not include your list of references)
- Responses need to be substantive by bringing information to the discussion or further enhance the discussion. Responses of “I agree” or “great post” does not count for the word count.
- Follow APA 7th edition
- Points will be deducted if the above is not followed
- Remember to use and follow APA-7th edition for all weekly assignments, discussion questions, and participation points.
- Here are some helpful links
- Student paper example
- Citing Sources
- The Writing Center is a great resource