Assignment: Mayspring Evaluation of Process

Assignment: Mayspring Evaluation of Process

Assignment  Mayspring Evaluation of Process

 

            The evidence-based project used data collected from the hyperbaric oxygen instruments to collect data related to the intervention. The utilization of the telemetry to collect data is fundamental as it allows for real-time reading of data as the intervention is applied. As such, the validity of the data will be guaranteed, which implies that the results of the data will be applicable to a wider population. Moreover, interviewing technique will be adopted to collect data from the patients concerning their comfort with the hyperbaric oxygen therapy intervention. The outcomes extracted from the interviewing techniques employed will be important as they are reliable since they can be manipulated using analytical software or manual quantification (Titler & Medvec, 2018). The results of the interview process can be applied in future studies they will reveal whether study participants favor the method or otherwise.

Way Outcomes Measure Project Effectiveness

            The outcome data for the present evidence-based project addresses the issue of hyperbaric oxygen therapy and how it can be used to offer wound healing. Indeed, the data gained from the project and the resultant analysis’s outcome can be used to compare the project vis-à-vis the data available in the literature (White, 2016). The assessment of the information would reveal that wound healing in diabetic foot ulcers will be facilitated by hyperbaric oxygen therapy. The interviewing technique will offer timely reminder concerning the effectiveness of the project and the perception that people have about it in order to enhance its implementation.

Measures

The outcomes of the current project will depend on the measurement of two parameters fundamental to wound healing. These parameters would involve the assessment of the peri-wound oxygenation as well as microcirculatory blood flow. The project will

Assignment Mayspring Evaluation of Process
Assignment Mayspring Evaluation of Process

examine the peri-wound oxygenation as well as the microcirculatory blood flow of the patients that will have been enrolled into the hyperbaric oxygen therapy programme (Heyboer et al., 2018). The outcomes will be valid since they will be obtained in a real-time manner using professional doctors. Further, the fact that the outcomes will be obtained using qualified evidence-based professionals will make them reliable. The reliability and validity of the data hence results obtained from the project will make it applicable to several management therapies for diabetic foot ulcers wounds.

 

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: Assignment: Mayspring Evaluation of Process

The outcomes of the present evidence-based project are not conclusively going to be positive. As such, it becomes paramount to seek for alternatives for the project through re-evaluating the objectives and goals (Buccheri & Sharifi, 2017). Presently, the project looks to assess the effectiveness of hyperbaric oxygen therapy when it comes to healing diabetic foot ulcers wounds. This occurs though assessment of variables such as microcirculation blood flow as well as peri-wound oxygenation. However, should the project fail to yield the desired results, the above parameters may be reformulated and the focus to shift on patient perception of the intervention.

Implications of the EBP to Research

            The project on the usage of hyperbaric oxygen therapy will be applied in the practice environment after its efficacy is determined. Diabetic foot ulcers are chronic conditions that health care professionals are grappling with when it comes to the management intervention. Thus, the outcomes of the present project will influence the management of the same. Moreover, the research field will also receive a boost as it relates to the usage of hyperbaric oxygen therapy. Different studies provide varied results when it comes to the effectiveness of interventions (Weiss, Bobay, Johantgen, & Shirey, 2018). Thus, the project will be used to bridge this gap in research and add to the volume of existing evidence-based literature on the matter.

In 500-750 words, develop an evaluation plan to be included in your final evidence-based practice project. Provide the following criteria in the evaluation, making sure it is comprehensive and concise:
Describe the rationale for the methods used in collecting the outcome data.
Describe the ways in which the outcome measures evaluate the extent to which the project objectives are achieved.
Describe how the outcomes will be measured and evaluated based on the evidence. Address validity, reliability, and applicability.
Describe strategies to take if outcomes do not provide positive results.
Describe implications for practice and future research.Assignment  Mayspring Evaluation of Process
You are required to cite three to five sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide.

Please follow the instructions. Last assignment received feedback that it\’s \”Vague\” and low grade.

Project title: In adult patients with diabetic foot ulcers how effective is hyperbaric oxygen therapy in providing wound healing. (P) Diabetic patients with foot ulcers, (I) hyperbaric oxygen therapy, (O) wound healing.

Lopes Write Policy

For assignments that need to be submitted to Lopes Write, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me.

Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes.

Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own?

Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score.

Late Policy

The university’s policy on late assignments is 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies.

Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances.

If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect.

I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension.

As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading.

Communication

Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me:

Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class.

Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours.

Important information for writing discussion questions and participation

Welcome to class

Hello class and welcome to the class and I will be your instructor for this course. This is a -week course and requires a lot of time commitment, organization, and a high level of dedication. Please use the class syllabus to guide you through all the assignments required for the course. I have also attached the classroom policies to this announcement to know your expectations for this course. Please review this document carefully and ask me any questions if you do. You could email me at any time or send me a message via the “message” icon in halo if you need to contact me. I check my email regularly, so you should get a response within 24 hours. If you have not heard from me within 24 hours and need to contact me urgently, please send a follow up text to

I strongly encourage that you do not wait until the very last minute to complete your assignments. Your assignments in weeks 4 and 5 require early planning as you would need to present a teaching plan and interview a community health provider. I advise you look at the requirements for these assignments at the beginning of the course and plan accordingly. I have posted the YouTube link that explains all the class assignments in detail. It is required that you watch this 32-minute video as the assignments from week 3 through 5 require that you follow the instructions to the letter to succeed. Failure to complete these assignments according to instructions might lead to a zero. After watching the video, please schedule a one-on-one with me to discuss your topic for your project by the second week of class. Use this link to schedule a 15-minute session. Please, call me at the time of your appointment on my number. Please note that I will NOT call you.

Please, be advised I do NOT accept any assignments by email. If you are having technical issues with uploading an assignment, contact the technical department and inform me of the issue. If you have any issues that would prevent you from getting your assignments to me by the deadline, please inform me to request a possible extension. Note that working fulltime or overtime is no excuse for late assignments. There is a 5%-point deduction for every day your assignment is late. This only applies to approved extensions. Late assignments will not be accepted.

If you think you would be needing accommodations due to any reasons, please contact the appropriate department to request accommodations.

Plagiarism is highly prohibited. Please ensure you are citing your sources correctly using APA 7th edition. All assignments including discussion posts should be formatted in APA with the appropriate spacing, font, margin, and indents. Any papers not well formatted would be returned back to you, hence, I advise you review APA formatting style. I have attached a sample paper in APA format and will also post sample discussion responses in subsequent announcements.

Your initial discussion post should be a minimum of 200 words and response posts should be a minimum of 150 words. Be advised that I grade based on quality and not necessarily the number of words you post. A minimum of TWO references should be used for your initial post. For your response post, you do not need references as personal experiences would count as response posts. If you however cite anything from the literature for your response post, it is required that you cite your reference. You should include a minimum of THREE references for papers in this course. Please note that references should be no more than 5 years old except recommended as a resource for the class. Furthermore, for each discussion board question, you need ONE initial substantive response and TWO substantive responses to either your classmates or your instructor for a total of THREE responses. There are TWO discussion questions each week, hence, you need a total minimum of SIX discussion posts for each week. I usually post a discussion question each week. You could also respond to these as it would count towards your required SIX discussion posts for the week.

I understand this is a lot of information to cover in 5 weeks, however, the Bible says in Philippians 4:13 that we can do all things through Christ that strengthens us. Even in times like this, we are encouraged by God’s word that we have that ability in us to succeed with His strength. I pray that each and every one of you receives strength for this course and life generally as we navigate through this pandemic that is shaking our world today. Relax and enjoy the course!

Hi Class,

Please read through the following information on writing a Discussion question response and participation posts.

Contact me if you have any questions.

Important information on Writing a Discussion Question

  • Your response needs to be a minimum of 150 words (not including your list of references)
  • There needs to be at least TWO references with ONE being a peer reviewed professional journal article.
  • Include in-text citations in your response
  • Do not include quotes—instead summarize and paraphrase the information
  • Follow APA-7th edition
  • Points will be deducted if the above is not followed

Participation –replies to your classmates or instructor

  • A minimum of 6 responses per week, on at least 3 days of the week.
  • Each response needs at least ONE reference with citations—best if it is a peer reviewed journal article
  • Each response needs to be at least 75 words in length (does not include your list of references)
  • Responses need to be substantive by bringing information to the discussion or further enhance the discussion. Responses of “I agree” or “great post” does not count for the word count.
  • Follow APA 7th edition
  • Points will be deducted if the above is not followed
  • Remember to use and follow APA-7th edition for all weekly assignments, discussion questions, and participation points.
  • Here are some helpful links
  • Student paper example
  • Citing Sources
  • The Writing Center is a great resource