Assignment: Leading a Culture of Excellence Essay
A Sample Answer For the Assignment: Assignment: Leading a Culture of Excellence Essay
Title: Assignment: Leading a Culture of Excellence Essay
Assignment Leading a Culture of Excellence Essay
Introduction
Delivery of great service tends to be a vision in almost all organizations. The approach not only benefit the recipients of services but also provide a competitive differentiator for a prospect in a given industry (Owens et al., 2017). In health sector, provision of high standards care guarantee quality outcomes to patients in addition to improving the reputation of the care facility in a given location. Improved health services to patients is implemented through creating a culture of excellence in a care facility whereby client satisfaction is optimized with regard to different ailments presented in the institution (Schulingkamp & Latham, 2015). However, driving a culture of excellence in a care facility is a daunting task since behaviors and actions of stakeholders as well as patients must be realigned with emerging changes affecting the healthcare industry. Besides, the current practice of value-based care necessitates a cultural improvement and this requires prior planning to nurture excellence in an organization.
The present article examines the concept of leading a culture of excellence in an organization. Organizational practices that nurtures a culture of excellence will be elaborated by using an example of Chamberlain College of Nursing. Three leadership strategies that inculcates a culture of excellence in a health institution will be explored to provide insights on the evidence of implementation.
Characteristics of a Culture of Excellence
High standards of health care services are expected by patients and their surrogates with regard to any aliment presented in a given hospital. Creating a culture of excellence in a care facility is vital to improve satisfaction and outcomes to patients (van et al., 2017). In a health setting, a culture of excellence occurs when the facility implements organization-wide approach in which every care provider pursues measurable improvements that guarantee quality outcomes to patients. With the new era of health service delivery, care facilities need to examine all aspects in the organization in order to incorporate changes which care providers can implement to improve patient satisfaction. According to Al Rahbi, Khalid and Khan (2017), a culture of excellence is a management philosophy that requires stakeholders to lead an organization towards achieving shared vision and values in the prospect.
In health setting, culture of excellence is characterized by enhanced performance in all approaches of care delivery. As per this context, health professions are tasked with designing experiences that improve patient and provider satisfaction through creating a culture of safety. However, for this to happen, the organization need to provide shared goals, values and vision which acts a fulcrum for all employees to follow (Schulingkamp & Latham, 2015). Often, positive values in provides a benchmark for the implementation of activities in the prospect and also allows workers to strive towards excellence and quality care. Hospitals that embrace a culture of excellence also create an opportunity of collaboration among staffs to facilitate sharing of skills during delivery of care services (Owens et al., 2017). However, leadership in an organization should create a culture of excellence to enable employees to follow the mission and vision of the prospect.
Mission, Vision, and Values of the Selected Organization
Chamberlain University is one of the institutions of learning that embraces a culture of excellence for the benefit to the members of staff and to the student population. Through its College of Nursing, the facility provides a learning culture and environment that have a significant and a positive impact to the nurses graduating from the center of learning. The success of the college has made it a preferred institution by students aspiring to pursue nursing course. The institution is defined by the following concept map.
Members of faculty and students at the Chamberlain University are exposed to a culture of excellence which improves the quality of learning. At the institution, students learn concepts of care and service delivery on a daily basis and this provides an opportunity for them to internalize nursing procedures essential for patient care. The philosophy of the institution related to a culture of excellence are defined by three pillars which include “caring for ourselves,” “caring for colleagues,” and “caring for students.” The model enable staff and students to recognize how the organization promotes value of nursing excellence for them to emulate the same in order to achieve the mission of the institution (Al Rahbi, Khalid & Khan, 2017). Nonetheless, the Chamberlain Care Framework focus on person, nursing, health as well as environment of care and with this, it provides an avenue for nurses graduating from the institution to provide holistic care to patients.
Leading a Culture of Excellence
According to van et al. (2017), embracing a culture of excellence requires leaders to provide a conducive environment that guarantee safety to all stakeholders in an organization. In this context, senior stakeholders should emulate servant leadership and incorporate the views of followers in the prospect. Promoting inclusivity in an organization conforms to Chamberlain’s Care Model that focus on care for self. In this context, emphasis will be given to the rights of all stakeholders so that they assume the liberty to utilize potentials of their professionalism.
Adequate communication serves to be an important leadership strategy to inculcate a culture of excellence in an organization. Owens et al. (2017) postulate that communication is a framework used to provide operational guidelines in a prospect. The strategy is relevant to Chamberlain’s Care Model as it enhances self-discovery of information and also provides peers and clients with information relevant for an organization.
Collaboration among team members is a vital leadership strategy that nurtures a culture of excellence in an organization. Through this approach, leadership is rooted in trust among followers to ensure that opinions from all stakeholders is treated with dignity and respect in order to propel the organization to greater heights (Schulingkamp & Latham, 2015). The strategy can be used to improve safety and care quality to patients as provision of health services is shared among professionals.
Assignment: Leading a Culture of Excellence Essay Conclusion
A culture of excellence is vital for the success of an organization. The premise motivates stakeholders to optimize quality of
outcomes in order to improve satisfaction to clients. However, fostering a culture of excellence tends to be complicated as it requires stakeholders to emulate dignity, respect and compassion as they provide care to patients. Most importantly, a culture of excellence is anchored on the mission and vision of a care facility as this lays a framework for practice. Based on this argument, organizations need to take a keen interest during the formulation of the mission and vision of the prospect to provide a suitable avenue for future success.
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: Assignment: Leading a Culture of Excellence Essay
Sample Answer for Assignment: Leading a Culture of Excellence Essay Included
Part II: Written Paper
In a three- to four- page paper, address the elements below. Use a minimum of four peer-reviewed scholarly sources, current within 5 years, to support your work. See the rubric for specific, required content criteria within each section of the paper.
Provide an introduction to the paper.
Discuss the characteristics of a culture of excellence.
Present the mission, vision, and values of a selected organization, and explain the interrelationships between each element in the concept map. Describe how the mission, vision, and values do or do not support a culture of excellence.
Discuss application of three specific leadership strategies that promote a culture of excellence, and how they support the Chamberlain Care Model®.
Provide a conclusion to the paper.
Preparing the Assignment
Criteria for Format and Special Instructions
Abide by the Chamberlain College of Nursing Academic Integrity Policy.
Part II: Using Microsoft Word 2013, create the written paper for this assignment. Include a title page with your name, date, and course information, as well as a reference page.
The paper (excluding title and reference pages) should be three to four pages in length.
A minimum of four peer-reviewed scholarly sources, current within 5 years, are required.
Sources older than 5 years may not be used without the permission of the class professor.
Only one short quote (15 words or less) may be used within the body of your writing.
Title page, running head, pagination, subheadings, body of paper, citation of sources, and reference page must follow APA guidelines as found in the 6th edition of the manual.
Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation, and sentence and paragraph structure are followed and consistent with formal, scholarly writing as noted in the APA Manual (6th edition).
First person may only be used in the self-reflection portion of the assignment (see Conclusion section for criteria).
Directions and Assignment Criteria
Grading Criteria
Part II
Introduction
9
5%
Introduction includes the following.
Importance of pursuing a culture of excellence within the healthcare industry
Key role of mission, vision, and values to guide organizational culture
Identify sections of the paper
Sufficient integration of scholarly literature to support information presented
Provide support from current, peer reviewed scholarly sources.
Part II
Culture of Excellence
26
15%
This section includes the following.
Explanation of the concept of a culture of excellence
Identification of at least three specific organizational characteristics or practices that reflect a culture of excellence
Discussion regarding how a culture of excellence is significant to the selected specialty track
Sufficient integration of scholarly literature to support information presented
Provide support from current, peer-reviewed scholarly sources.
Part II
Overview of Concept Map:
Mission, Vision, and Values
26
15%
This section includes the following.
Description of the mission, vision, and values of a selected organization
Explanation regarding the interrelationships portrayed within the concept map
Discussion regarding how the mission, vision, and values do or to not reflect a culture of excellence
Sufficient integration of scholarly literature to support information presented
Provide support from current, peer-reviewed scholarly sources.
Part II
Leading a Culture of Excellence
35
20%
This section includes the following.
Identification and discussion of two specific leadership strategies that will promote a culture of excellence in the selected MSN specialty track role
Explanation of how the two identified leadership strategies reflect the Chamberlain Care Model®
Sufficient integration of scholarly literature to support information presented
Provide support from current, peer-reviewed scholarly sources.
Part II
Conclusion
18
10%
Conclusion includes the following.
Summary that addresses the following.
Importance of a culture of excellence
Leadership strategies that support a culture of excellence
Synopsis of the selected mission, vision, and values and how they do or do not support a culture of excellence
Self-reflection of learning regarding new insights gained by completing this assignment
Self-reflection regarding implications for future advanced nursing practice in the selected MSN specialty track
Graduate-level Writing Style
26
15%
Graduate-level writing style is included, evidenced by integrating the following standards.
Correct use of spelling, grammar, punctuation, sentence and paragraph structure
Clarity, organization, and logical flow of ideas within writing; accurate use of APA levels of headings
APA format for citing and referencing sources
No more than one short quote (15 words or less) is used within the assignment
APA document format including margins, spacing, font style and size
APA document structure including running head, pagination, title page, reference page
Congruence with APA mechanics of style (abbreviations, capitalization, italics, numbers, and use of figures or tables if applicable)
Use of first person tense is limited to the self-reflection portion of the conclusion
Quality of Literature Support
It is an expectation that a minimum of four current, peer-reviewed scholarly sources are integrated within the assignment.
If the above expectation is not met, 9 points shall be deducted.
Paper Length
It is an expectation that the paper is a minimum of three full pages in length, and no more than four full pages in length.
If the above expectation is not met, 9 points shall be deducted.
Total
175
100%
A quality assignment will meet or exceed all the above requirements.
Rubric
Week 5: Leading a Culture of Excellence Paper
Week 5: Leading a Culture of Excellence Paper
Criteria
Ratings
Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Part I: Concept Map
35.0 pts
Exemplary
Exemplary presentation of information evidenced by all content areas covered in a comprehensive and concise manner. All of the following are included in the concept map: • Organizational mission, vision, and values • Interrelationships between the mission, vision and values • How the organizational mission, vision, and values do or do not reflect a culture of excellence • The concept map must be the student’s personal, original work • Submission guidelines are followed
32.0 pts
Accomplished
Accomplished presentation of information evidenced by most content covered in a comprehensive and concise manner, but with one area where coverage is superficial. All of the following are included in the concept map: • Organizational mission, vision, and values • Interrelationships between the mission, vision and values • How the organizational mission, vision, and values do or do not reflect a culture of excellence • The concept map must be the student’s personal, original work • Submission guidelines are followed
29.0 pts
Average
Average presentation of information evidenced by content covered in a superficial manner in two or more of the content areas. All of the following are included: A concept map is submitted which portrays: • Organizational mission, vision, and values • Interrelationships between the mission, vision and values • How the organizational mission, vision, and values do or do not reflect a culture of excellence • The concept map must be the student’s personal, original work • Submission guidelines are followed
26.0 pts
Marginally Acceptable
Marginally acceptable presentation of information evidenced by content that is limited, missing, or unsatisfactory in one of the following: A concept map is submitted which portrays: • Organizational mission, vision, and values • Interrelationships between the mission, vision and values • How the organizational mission, vision, and values do or do not reflect a culture of excellence • The concept map must be the student’s personal, original work • Submission guidelines are followed
0.0 pts
Insufficient
Insufficient presentation of information evidenced by content that is limited, missing, or unsatisfactory in two or more of the following: A concept map is submitted which portrays: • Organizational mission, vision, and values • Interrelationships between the mission, vision and values • How the organizational mission, vision, and values do or do not reflect a culture of excellence • The concept map must be the student’s personal, original work • Submission guidelines are followed
35.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Part II: Introduction
9.0 pts
Exemplary
Exemplary presentation of information evidenced by all content areas covered in a comprehensive and concise manner. All of the following are included: • Importance of pursuing a culture of excellence within the health care industry • Key role of mission, vision and values to guide organizational culture • Identify sections of the paper • Sufficient integration of scholarly literature to support information presented
8.0 pts
Accomplished
Accomplished presentation of information evidenced by most content covered in a comprehensive and concise manner, but with one area where coverage is superficial. All of the following are included: • Importance of pursuing a culture of excellence within the health care industry • Key role of mission, vision and values to guide organizational culture • Identify sections of the paper • Sufficient integration of scholarly literature to support information presented
7.0 pts
Average
Average presentation of information evidenced by content covered in a superficial manner in two or more of the content areas. All of the following are included: • Importance of pursuing a culture of excellence within the health care industry • Key role of mission, vision and values to guide organizational culture • Identify sections of the paper • Sufficient integration of scholarly literature to support information presented
6.0 pts
Marginally Acceptable
Marginally acceptable presentation of information evidenced by content that is limited, missing, or unsatisfactory in one of the following: • Importance of pursuing a culture of excellence within the health care industry • Key role of mission, vision and values to guide organizational culture • Identify sections of the paper • Sufficient integration of scholarly literature to support information presented
0.0 pts
Insufficient
Insufficient presentation of information evidenced by content that is limited, missing, or unsatisfactory in two or more of the following: • Importance of pursuing a culture of excellence within the health care industry • Key role of mission, vision and values to guide organizational culture • Identify sections of the paper • Sufficient integration of scholarly literature to support information presented
9.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Part II: Culture of Excellence
26.0 pts
Exemplary
Exemplary presentation of information evidenced by all content areas covered in a comprehensive and concise manner. All of the following are included: • Explanation of the concept of a culture of excellence • Identification of at least three specific organizational characteristics or practices which reflect a culture of excellence • Discussion regarding how a culture of excellence is significant to the selected specialty track • Sufficient integration of scholarly literature to support information presented
23.0 pts
Accomplished
Accomplished presentation of information evidenced by most content covered in a comprehensive and concise manner, but with one area where coverage is superficial. All of the following are included: • Explanation of the concept of a culture of excellence • Identification of at least three specific organizational characteristics or practices which reflect a culture of excellence • Discussion regarding how a culture of excellence is significant to the selected specialty track • Sufficient integration of scholarly literature to support information presented
21.0 pts
Average
Average presentation of information evidenced by content covered in a superficial manner in two or more of the content areas. All of the following are included: • Explanation of the concept of a culture of excellence • Identification of at least three specific organizational characteristics or practices which reflect a culture of excellence • Discussion regarding how a culture of excellence is significant to the selected specialty track • Sufficient integration of scholarly literature to support information presented
19.0 pts
Marginally Acceptable
Marginally acceptable presentation of information evidenced by content that is limited, missing, or unsatisfactory in one of the following: • Explanation of the concept of a culture of excellence • Identification of at least three specific organizational characteristics or practices which reflect a culture of excellence • Discussion regarding how a culture of excellence is significant to the selected specialty track • Sufficient integration of scholarly literature to support information presented
0.0 pts
Insufficient
Insufficient presentation of information evidenced by content that is limited, missing, or unsatisfactory in two or more of the following: • Explanation of the concept of a culture of excellence • Identification of at least three specific organizational characteristics or practices which reflect a culture of excellence • Discussion regarding how a culture of excellence is significant to the selected specialty track • Sufficient integration of scholarly literature to support information presented
26.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Part II: Overview of Concept Map: Mission, Vision, Values
26.0 pts
Exemplary
Exemplary presentation of information evidenced by all content areas covered in a comprehensive and concise manner. All of the following are included: • Description of the mission, vision, and values of a selected organization • Explanation regarding the inter-relationships portrayed within the concept map • Discussion regarding how the mission, vision, and values do or do not reflect a culture of excellence • Sufficient integration of scholarly literature to support information presented
23.0 pts
Accomplished
Accomplished presentation of information evidenced by most content covered in a comprehensive and concise manner, but with one area where coverage is superficial. All of the following are included: • Description of the mission, vision, and values of a selected organization • Explanation regarding the inter-relationships portrayed within the concept map • Discussion regarding how the mission, vision, and values do or do not reflect a culture of excellence • Sufficient integration of scholarly literature to support information presented
21.0 pts
Average
Average presentation of information evidenced by content covered in a superficial manner in two or more of the content areas. All of the following are included: • Description of the mission, vision, and values of a selected organization • Explanation regarding the inter-relationships portrayed within the concept map • Discussion regarding how the mission, vision, and values do or do not reflect a culture of excellence • Sufficient integration of scholarly literature to support information presented
19.0 pts
Marginally Acceptable
Marginally acceptable presentation of information evidenced by content that is limited, missing, or unsatisfactory in one of the following: • Description of the mission, vision, and values of a selected organization • Explanation regarding the interrelationships portrayed within the concept map • Discussion regarding how the mission, vision, and values do or do not reflect a culture of excellence • Sufficient integration of scholarly literature to support information presented
0.0 pts
Insufficient
Insufficient presentation of information evidenced by content that is limited, missing, or unsatisfactory in two or more of the following: • Description of the mission, vision, and values of a selected organization • Explanation regarding the interrelationships portrayed within the concept map • Discussion regarding how the mission, vision, and values do or do not reflect a culture of excellence • Sufficient integration of scholarly literature to support information presented
26.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Part II: Leading a Culture of Excellence
35.0 pts
Exemplary
Exemplary presentation of information evidenced by all content areas covered in a comprehensive and concise manner. All of the following are included: • Identification and discussion of two specific leadership strategies which will promote a culture of excellence in the selected MSN specialty track role • Explanation of how the two chosen leadership strategies support the Chamberlain Care Model® • Sufficient integration of scholarly literature to support information presented
32.0 pts
Accomplished
Accomplished presentation of information evidenced by most content covered in a comprehensive and concise manner, but with one area where coverage is superficial. All of the following are included: • Identification and discussion of two specific leadership strategies which will promote a culture of excellence in the selected MSN specialty track role • Explanation of how the two chosen leadership strategies support the Chamberlain Care Model® • Sufficient integration of scholarly literature to support information presented
29.0 pts
Average
Average presentation of information evidenced by content covered in a superficial manner in two or more of the content areas. All of the following are included: • Identification and discussion of two specific leadership strategies which will promote a culture of excellence in the selected MSN specialty track role • Explanation of how the two chosen leadership strategies support the Chamberlain Care Model® • Sufficient integration of scholarly literature to support information presented
26.0 pts
Marginally Acceptable
Marginally acceptable presentation of information evidenced by content that is limited, missing, or unsatisfactory in one of the following: • Identification and discussion of two specific leadership strategies which will promote a culture of excellence in the selected MSN specialty track role • Explanation of how the two chosen leadership strategies support the Chamberlain Care Model® • Sufficient integration of scholarly literature to support information presented
0.0 pts
Insufficient
Insufficient presentation of information evidenced by content that is limited, missing, or unsatisfactory in two or more of the following: • Identification and discussion of two specific leadership strategies which will promote a culture of excellence in the selected MSN specialty track role • Explanation of how the two chosen leadership strategies support the Chamberlain Care Model® • Sufficient integration of scholarly literature to support information presented
35.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Part II: Conclusion
Self-reflections may be in first person
18.0 pts
Exemplary
Exemplary presentation of information evidenced by all content areas covered in a comprehensive and concise manner. All of the following are included: • Summary which addresses the following: (1) the importance of a culture of excellence; and (2) leadership strategies that support a culture of excellence • Synopsis of the selected mission, vision, and values and how they do or do not support a culture of excellence • Self-reflection of learning regarding new insights gained by completing this assignment • Self-reflection regarding implications for future advanced nursing practice in the selected MSN specialty track
16.0 pts
Accomplished
Accomplished presentation of information evidenced by most content covered in a comprehensive and concise manner, but with one area where coverage is superficial. All of the following are included: • Summary which addresses the following: (1) the importance of a culture of excellence; and (2) leadership strategies that support a culture of excellence • Synopsis of the selected mission, vision, and values and how they do or do not support a culture of excellence • Self-reflection of learning regarding new insights gained by completing this assignment • Self-reflection regarding implications for future advanced nursing practice in the selected MSN specialty track
15.0 pts
Average
Average presentation of information evidenced by content covered in a superficial manner in two or more of the content areas. All of the following are included: • Summary which addresses the following: (1) the importance of a culture of excellence; and (2) leadership strategies that support a culture of excellence • Synopsis of the selected mission, vision, and values and how they do or do not support a culture of excellence • Self-reflection of learning regarding new insights gained by completing this assignment • Self-reflection regarding implications for future advanced nursing practice in the selected MSN specialty track
13.0 pts
Marginally Acceptable
Marginally acceptable presentation of information evidenced by content that is limited, missing, or unsatisfactory in one of the following: • Summary which addresses the following: (1) the importance of a culture of excellence; and (2) leadership strategies that support a culture of excellence • Synopsis of the selected mission, vision, and values and how they do or do not support a culture of excellence • Self-reflection of learning regarding new insights gained by completing this assignment • Self-reflection regarding implications for future advanced nursing practice in the selected MSN specialty track
0.0 pts
Insufficient
Insufficient presentation of information evidenced by content that is limited, missing, or unsatisfactory in two or more of the following: • Summary which addresses the following: (1) the importance of a culture of excellence; and (2) leadership strategies that support a culture of excellence • Synopsis of the selected mission, vision, and values and how they do or do not support a culture of excellence • Self-reflection of learning regarding new insights gained by completing this assignment • Self-reflection regarding implications for future advanced nursing practice in the selected MSN specialty track
18.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Graduate Level Writing Style
26.0 pts
Exemplary
Exemplary graduate level writing style is evident, which meets all of the criteria below: • Correct spelling, grammar, punctuation, sentence and paragraph structure • Exceptional writing style with clarity, flow, and organization of information throughout the paper, including accurate use of APA levels of headings • APA format for citing and referencing sources • APA document format including margins, spacing, font style and size • APA document structure including running head, pagination, title page, reference page • Congruence with APA mechanics of style (abbreviations, capitalization, italics, numbers, and use of figures or tables if applicable) • No more than one short direct quote (15 words or less) is used within the assignment • Use of first person is limited to the self-reflection portion of the conclusion
23.0 pts
Accomplished
Accomplished graduate-level writing style is evident which meets at least 6 of the criteria below: • No more than 2 errors in spelling, grammar, punctuation, sentence and paragraph structure • No more than 2 errors in writing style with clarity, flow, and organization of information throughout the paper, including accurate use of APA levels of headings • No more than 2 errors in APA format for citing and referencing sources • No more than 2 errors in APA document format including margins, spacing, font style and font size • No more than 2 errors in APA document structure including running head, pagination, title page, and reference page • No more than 2 errors in APA mechanics of style (abbreviations, capitalization, italics, numbers, and use of figures or tables if applicable) • No more than one short direct quote (15 words or less) is used within the assignment • Use of first person is limited to the self-reflection portion of the conclusion
21.0 pts
Average
Average graduate-level writing style is evident which meets at least 4 of the criteria below: • No more than 2 errors in spelling, grammar, punctuation, sentence and paragraph structure • No more than 2 errors in writing style with clarity, flow, and organization of information throughout the paper, including accurate use of APA levels of headings • No more than 2 errors in APA format for citing and referencing sources • No more than 2 errors in APA document format including margins, spacing, font style and font size • No more than 2 errors in APA document structure including running head, pagination, title page, and reference page • No more than 2 errors in APA mechanics of style (abbreviations, capitalization, italics, numbers, and use of figures or tables if applicable) • No more than one short direct quote (15 words or less) is used within the assignment • Use of first person is limited to the self-reflection portion of the conclusion
19.0 pts
Marginally Acceptable
Marginally acceptable graduate-level writing is evident which meets at least 2 of the criteria below: • No more than 2 errors in spelling, grammar, punctuation, sentence and paragraph structure • No more than 2 errors in writing style with clarity, flow, and organization of information throughout the paper, including accurate use of APA levels of headings • No more than 2 errors in APA format for citing and referencing sources • No more than 2 errors in APA document format including margins, spacing, font style and font size • No more than 2 errors in APA document structure including running head, pagination, title page, and reference page • No more than 2 errors in APA mechanics of style (abbreviations, capitalization, italics, numbers, and use of figures or tables if applicable) • No more than one short direct quote (15 words or less) is used within the assignment • Use of first person is limited to the self-reflection portion of the conclusion
0.0 pts
Insufficient
Insufficient graduate-level writing style is evident which meets 1 or less of the criteria below: • No more than 2 errors in spelling, grammar, punctuation, sentence and paragraph structure • No more than 2 errors in writing style with clarity, flow, and organization of information throughout the paper, including accurate use of APA levels of headings • No more than 2 errors in APA format for citing and referencing sources • No more than 2 errors in APA document format including margins, spacing, font style and font size • No more than 2 errors in APA document structure including running head, pagination, title page, and reference page • No more than 2 errors in APA mechanics of style (abbreviations, capitalization, italics, numbers, and use of figures or tables if applicable) • No more than one short direct quote (15 words or less) is used within the assignment • Use of first person is limited to the self-reflection portion of the conclusion
26.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Quality of literature support
0.0 pts
0 points Deducted
A minimum of four peer-reviewed scholarly sources, current within five years, are integrated within the assignment.
0.0 pts
9 points deducted
The assignment fails to meet the requirement noted for quality of literature support.
0.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Assignment Length
0.0 pts
0 points deducted
The length of the paper portion of the assignment is a minimum of three full pages in length and is no more than four full pages in length. Total page count does not include title or reference pages.
0.0 pts
9 points deducted
The assignment fails to meet the requirement noted for total length.
0.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Late Deductions
0.0 pts
Does not meet deadline
Student does not meet the deadline for submission 10% per day up to 30% total (3-days)
0.0 pts
Meets deadline
Submission met deadline, 0 points lost
0.0 pts
Total Points: 175.0
Lopes Write Policy
For assignments that need to be submitted to Lopes Write, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me.
Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes.
Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own?
Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score.
Late Policy
The university’s policy on late assignments is 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies.
Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances.
If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect.
I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension.
As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading.
Communication
Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me:
Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class.
Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours.
Important information for writing discussion questions and participation
Welcome to class
Hello class and welcome to the class and I will be your instructor for this course. This is a -week course and requires a lot of time commitment, organization, and a high level of dedication. Please use the class syllabus to guide you through all the assignments required for the course. I have also attached the classroom policies to this announcement to know your expectations for this course. Please review this document carefully and ask me any questions if you do. You could email me at any time or send me a message via the “message” icon in halo if you need to contact me. I check my email regularly, so you should get a response within 24 hours. If you have not heard from me within 24 hours and need to contact me urgently, please send a follow up text to
I strongly encourage that you do not wait until the very last minute to complete your assignments. Your assignments in weeks 4 and 5 require early planning as you would need to present a teaching plan and interview a community health provider. I advise you look at the requirements for these assignments at the beginning of the course and plan accordingly. I have posted the YouTube link that explains all the class assignments in detail. It is required that you watch this 32-minute video as the assignments from week 3 through 5 require that you follow the instructions to the letter to succeed. Failure to complete these assignments according to instructions might lead to a zero. After watching the video, please schedule a one-on-one with me to discuss your topic for your project by the second week of class. Use this link to schedule a 15-minute session. Please, call me at the time of your appointment on my number. Please note that I will NOT call you.
Please, be advised I do NOT accept any assignments by email. If you are having technical issues with uploading an assignment, contact the technical department and inform me of the issue. If you have any issues that would prevent you from getting your assignments to me by the deadline, please inform me to request a possible extension. Note that working fulltime or overtime is no excuse for late assignments. There is a 5%-point deduction for every day your assignment is late. This only applies to approved extensions. Late assignments will not be accepted.
If you think you would be needing accommodations due to any reasons, please contact the appropriate department to request accommodations.
Plagiarism is highly prohibited. Please ensure you are citing your sources correctly using APA 7th edition. All assignments including discussion posts should be formatted in APA with the appropriate spacing, font, margin, and indents. Any papers not well formatted would be returned back to you, hence, I advise you review APA formatting style. I have attached a sample paper in APA format and will also post sample discussion responses in subsequent announcements.
Your initial discussion post should be a minimum of 200 words and response posts should be a minimum of 150 words. Be advised that I grade based on quality and not necessarily the number of words you post. A minimum of TWO references should be used for your initial post. For your response post, you do not need references as personal experiences would count as response posts. If you however cite anything from the literature for your response post, it is required that you cite your reference. You should include a minimum of THREE references for papers in this course. Please note that references should be no more than 5 years old except recommended as a resource for the class. Furthermore, for each discussion board question, you need ONE initial substantive response and TWO substantive responses to either your classmates or your instructor for a total of THREE responses. There are TWO discussion questions each week, hence, you need a total minimum of SIX discussion posts for each week. I usually post a discussion question each week. You could also respond to these as it would count towards your required SIX discussion posts for the week.
I understand this is a lot of information to cover in 5 weeks, however, the Bible says in Philippians 4:13 that we can do all things through Christ that strengthens us. Even in times like this, we are encouraged by God’s word that we have that ability in us to succeed with His strength. I pray that each and every one of you receives strength for this course and life generally as we navigate through this pandemic that is shaking our world today. Relax and enjoy the course!
Hi Class,
Please read through the following information on writing a Discussion question response and participation posts.
Contact me if you have any questions.
Important information on Writing a Discussion Question
- Your response needs to be a minimum of 150 words (not including your list of references)
- There needs to be at least TWO references with ONE being a peer reviewed professional journal article.
- Include in-text citations in your response
- Do not include quotes—instead summarize and paraphrase the information
- Follow APA-7th edition
- Points will be deducted if the above is not followed
Participation –replies to your classmates or instructor
- A minimum of 6 responses per week, on at least 3 days of the week.
- Each response needs at least ONE reference with citations—best if it is a peer reviewed journal article
- Each response needs to be at least 75 words in length (does not include your list of references)
- Responses need to be substantive by bringing information to the discussion or further enhance the discussion. Responses of “I agree” or “great post” does not count for the word count.
- Follow APA 7th edition
- Points will be deducted if the above is not followed
- Remember to use and follow APA-7th edition for all weekly assignments, discussion questions, and participation points.
- Here are some helpful links
- Student paper example
- Citing Sources
- The Writing Center is a great resource