Assignment: Find and Critique Supporting Articles
Sample Answer for Assignment: Find and Critique Supporting Articles Included After Question
Assignment Find and Critique Supporting Articles
Is the problem easy to identify?
Is it significant for nursing?
Is the research design appropriate for the problem?
Is there a clear need for the study? The problem of the study is easy to identify. This can be seen from the review of literature that identified gaps in studies conducted in the past. The problem is significant to nursing because it informs the utilization of the intervention in promoting oral care in extubated patients. The research design is appropriate for the problem. It allowed the determination of the effectiveness of the intervention by comparing the outcomes in the control and intervention group. There is a clear need for the study based on the limited evidence on the effectiveness of the intervention in promoting optimum oral health for post-mechanically ventilated patients.
Hypotheses or research questions
Are the questions or hypotheses explicitly stated? If not, is their absence explained?
Can you easily identify the variables the way the questions or hypotheses are worded? The researchers did not state research questions or hypotheses. The reason for the absence of these components has not been given.
Literature Review
Is the literature review up-to-date and based mostly on primary sources?
Did the review adequately summarize the evidence?
Does the literature review make it clear there is a need for a study of this kind? The literature review is up-to date. This can be seen from the primary sources that have been utilized. A majority of them were published within five years from the year 2016. However, the use of old sources of data such as those dated 2006 weakens the strength of the reviewed literature. There is adequate summary of evidence. The researchers summarized the studies conducted on the topic and identified the areas of further research, thereby, increasing the relevance of their proposal. Therefore, they made clear the need for their research.
Conceptual/theoretical framework
Is the conceptual or theoretical frame clearly identified? The use of conceptual or theoretical framework is not evidence in the research. Instead, the researchers developed a protocol that guided their study.
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: Assignment: Find and Critique Supporting Articles
Method
Protection of human rights
Were rights of the study participants protected?
Was the study externally reviewed by an IRB or ethics review board?
Was the study clearly designed to minimize risks and maximize benefits to the participants? The rights of the participants were protected. The participants provided their consent prior to participating in it. The study was reviewed by the Ohio State University Institutional Review Board. There was not external institution involved in approving the research. The study was intended to minimize risks while maximizing the benefits to the participants. The researchers ensured that the intervention had minimal adverse outcomes to the researchers. There were optimum benefits associated with the intervention.
Research Design
Was the most rigorous design used given the purpose of the study?
Was the number of data collection points appropriate?
Did the design minimize biases and threats to study validity by using blinding and minimizing attrition? The research design was rigorous to meet the purpose of the study. It allowed for the determination of the effect of the intervention on the population. It also allowed for minimization of the effects of confounding factors on the outcomes. The number of data collection points was appropriate as they allowed for the determination of the effect and not the influence of other factors. The use of the randomization in the adopted design in the research-minimized bias since there was equal chance for participation in it.
Population and sample
Was the population identified?
Was the sample described in adequate detail?
Were sampling biases minimized?
Was the sample size adequate? The population was identified to be post-mechanical ventilation patients. The sample was described in adequate detail using the inclusion and exclusion criteria. They were also described based on their health status. The sample biases were minimized using randomization. However, the sample size might be argued to have been small. The use of 74 participants makes it difficult to generalize the findings to a larger population.
Data collection and measurement
Were key variables measured using an appropriate method (interviews, observations, etc.)?
Were the instruments identified?
Did the report provide evidence that the methods were reliable, valid, and responsive? The variables were measured using appropriate methods. Subjective data was obtained using interviews while objective data such as R-THROAT was obtained using pre-developed measures of oral health. Laboratory investigations were also performed to determine the effectiveness of the intervention. The instruments of data collection included questionnaires, R-THROAT instrument, and ESAS-r for assessment of symptom burden. The research provided report on the reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the instruments. This can be seen in the stability in findings that were obtained prior and after the study.
Procedures
If there was an intervention, was it well described?
Did most of the participants allocated to the intervention group actually receive it?
Was data collected in a non-bias manner?
Were the individuals collecting data appropriately trained so they did not impact the results? The intervention that was used is explained explicitly in the research. Those participants who were allocated to the intervention group received the intervention. They were all administered with the intervention with the aim of determining the effect among them. The data was collected objectively from them, hence, being non-biased. In-service training was offered to the participants to ensure uniformity and accuracy of the data being obtained from the research.
Identify Statistical Tests
Bivariate (e.g., t-test, ANOVA, Pearson’s r) The tests included t-tests, Fisher’s exact test, and chi-square. Regression analysis was also performed to determine the impact of the intervention on oral care.
Multivariate (e.g., multiple regression, logistic regression)
Summarize findings, limitations, and recommendations
Summary of study main points and learnings
What is the effect size?
Is the study statistically significant?
Is the study clinically significant?
What are the recommendations for future studies? There was a medium size effect of the intervention. The study was clinically significant since there was an overall improvement in the outcomes with the use of the intervention. Therefore, the intervention can be utilized in practice. The study was not statistically significant. This can be seen in the small sample size that was utilized in the research.
The next step in the research process is to find and critique appropriate academic articles that support your research topic.
Credible academic sources create a stronger argument about the significance of a research problem and validate your position on the topic. Sources should address prior studies on your topic and will give you an indication of how to approach your research design.
Conducting a thorough critique of each article will help you to identify the purpose of the study and ensure it aligns with the problem you want to research.
For the purposes of this assignment, we have provided two studies for you to critique so you can practice interpreting report information and findings.
Review pages 60–63 of Nursing Research before starting your critique. The information will be helpful when reading and interpreting the articles.
Access Nursing Research via the Nursing Research Access link in this week’s assignment folder.
Read the following articles in the University Library before using the templates to critique:
Quantitative study: “Outcomes of an Oral Care Protocol in Postmechanically Ventilated Patients”
Qualitative study: “Spirituality Expressed by Caregivers of Stroke Survivors”
Use the quantitative and qualitative critique templates to complete your assignment.
Lopes Write Policy
For assignments that need to be submitted to Lopes Write, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me.
Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes.
Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own?
Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score.
Late Policy
The university’s policy on late assignments is 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies.
Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances.
If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect.
I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension.
As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading.
Communication
Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me:
Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class.
Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours.
Important information for writing discussion questions and participation
Welcome to class
Hello class and welcome to the class and I will be your instructor for this course. This is a -week course and requires a lot of time commitment, organization, and a high level of dedication. Please use the class syllabus to guide you through all the assignments required for the course. I have also attached the classroom policies to this announcement to know your expectations for this course. Please review this document carefully and ask me any questions if you do. You could email me at any time or send me a message via the “message” icon in halo if you need to contact me. I check my email regularly, so you should get a response within 24 hours. If you have not heard from me within 24 hours and need to contact me urgently, please send a follow up text to
I strongly encourage that you do not wait until the very last minute to complete your assignments. Your assignments in weeks 4 and 5 require early planning as you would need to present a teaching plan and interview a community health provider. I advise you look at the requirements for these assignments at the beginning of the course and plan accordingly. I have posted the YouTube link that explains all the class assignments in detail. It is required that you watch this 32-minute video as the assignments from week 3 through 5 require that you follow the instructions to the letter to succeed. Failure to complete these assignments according to instructions might lead to a zero. After watching the video, please schedule a one-on-one with me to discuss your topic for your project by the second week of class. Use this link to schedule a 15-minute session. Please, call me at the time of your appointment on my number. Please note that I will NOT call you.
Please, be advised I do NOT accept any assignments by email. If you are having technical issues with uploading an assignment, contact the technical department and inform me of the issue. If you have any issues that would prevent you from getting your assignments to me by the deadline, please inform me to request a possible extension. Note that working fulltime or overtime is no excuse for late assignments. There is a 5%-point deduction for every day your assignment is late. This only applies to approved extensions. Late assignments will not be accepted.
If you think you would be needing accommodations due to any reasons, please contact the appropriate department to request accommodations.
Plagiarism is highly prohibited. Please ensure you are citing your sources correctly using APA 7th edition. All assignments including discussion posts should be formatted in APA with the appropriate spacing, font, margin, and indents. Any papers not well formatted would be returned back to you, hence, I advise you review APA formatting style. I have attached a sample paper in APA format and will also post sample discussion responses in subsequent announcements.
Your initial discussion post should be a minimum of 200 words and response posts should be a minimum of 150 words. Be advised that I grade based on quality and not necessarily the number of words you post. A minimum of TWO references should be used for your initial post. For your response post, you do not need references as personal experiences would count as response posts. If you however cite anything from the literature for your response post, it is required that you cite your reference. You should include a minimum of THREE references for papers in this course. Please note that references should be no more than 5 years old except recommended as a resource for the class. Furthermore, for each discussion board question, you need ONE initial substantive response and TWO substantive responses to either your classmates or your instructor for a total of THREE responses. There are TWO discussion questions each week, hence, you need a total minimum of SIX discussion posts for each week. I usually post a discussion question each week. You could also respond to these as it would count towards your required SIX discussion posts for the week.
I understand this is a lot of information to cover in 5 weeks, however, the Bible says in Philippians 4:13 that we can do all things through Christ that strengthens us. Even in times like this, we are encouraged by God’s word that we have that ability in us to succeed with His strength. I pray that each and every one of you receives strength for this course and life generally as we navigate through this pandemic that is shaking our world today. Relax and enjoy the course!
Hi Class,
Please read through the following information on writing a Discussion question response and participation posts.
Contact me if you have any questions.
Important information on Writing a Discussion Question
- Your response needs to be a minimum of 150 words (not including your list of references)
- There needs to be at least TWO references with ONE being a peer reviewed professional journal article.
- Include in-text citations in your response
- Do not include quotes—instead summarize and paraphrase the information
- Follow APA-7th edition
- Points will be deducted if the above is not followed
Participation –replies to your classmates or instructor
- A minimum of 6 responses per week, on at least 3 days of the week.
- Each response needs at least ONE reference with citations—best if it is a peer reviewed journal article
- Each response needs to be at least 75 words in length (does not include your list of references)
- Responses need to be substantive by bringing information to the discussion or further enhance the discussion. Responses of “I agree” or “great post” does not count for the word count.
- Follow APA 7th edition
- Points will be deducted if the above is not followed
- Remember to use and follow APA-7th edition for all weekly assignments, discussion questions, and participation points.
- Here are some helpful links
- Student paper example
- Citing Sources
- The Writing Center is a great resource