Boost your Grades with us today!
Assignment: Evidenced Based Practice, Nursing Theories and Nursing Research
Sample Answer for Assignment: Evidenced Based Practice, Nursing Theories and Nursing Research Included After Question
Assignment Evidenced Based Practice, Nursing Theories and Nursing Research
In topic 5 discussion question 1, the issue of nursing shortage in home care agencies received attention from the author. DeNisco and Baker (2016) opine that in order to critically appraise evidence, one needs to possess strong research literacy that is inclusive of knowledge concerning research methods. Applying this assertion, I will use meta-synthesis of qualitative studies and peer-reviewed resources to critically appraise evidence on the matter. Draket (2015) posits that the critical appraisal of the qualitative research that the author will predominantly employ rests on the following key issues:
- Clear purpose of the study stated
- Appropriate rationale for using the qualitative study offered
- Clear outline of the conceptual framework
- Presence of ethical understanding of the project
- Presence of appropriate sampling group
- Presence of appropriate data analysis methods
- Presence of solutions to the data collection validity and reliability, as well as analysis and interpretation of the same
- The presence of clear progression from research question to conclusions drawn from the data.
- Has the work been conducted within the last five years?
The above criteria is fundamentally used to critically appraise the relevance of a qualitative study to a research problem. DeNico and Baker (2016) argue that publication of a research does not guarantee its quality, applicability or value to a clinical issue. Therefore, it becomes important to use knowledge and literacy to make the determination. For this reason, the above-created criteria will ensure that the chosen research articles are relevant to the issue of nursing shortage (Patton, 2014). In other words, the criteria will identify the strengths and weaknesses of the articles, hence helping one to determine the validity and applicability of the same.
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: Assignment: Evidenced Based Practice, Nursing Theories and Nursing Research
A Sample Answer For the Assignment: Assignment: Evidenced Based Practice, Nursing Theories and Nursing Research
Title: Assignment: Evidenced Based Practice, Nursing Theories and Nursing Research
According to DeNisco and Baker (2016), health care professionals including students need to acquaint themselves with the skills for effective literature search and the utilization of formal rules to critically examine the evidence. The formal rules herein refer to the
presentation of knowledge from literature and the art of giving credit to the author of a cited work. To this end, when I discover that my classmate has inappropriately cited or refused to cite works from authors in their PICO statement, the next course of action would be to make them realize the grave academic sin that they will be committing. Thus, I will first of all ensure that the classmate understands the impact of that error of omission on the originality of the work that they will be presenting. According to EBP dictates, the originality of a research work is determined by the presence of appropriately cited author names and year and in some cases page numbers depending on the adopted format (Macrina, 2014). In addition to originality, I will also discuss with the classmate the role of citation with regards to offering evidence or support to the ideas he will be presenting in his PICO assignment. Through this, I will highlight to him the need to make the readers of the work realize that he had made serious and proper research through properly citing his sources and acknowledging the authors thereof hence avoiding plagiarism.
Also, the commission of the above-mentioned errors by the colleague will have credibility and integrity ramifications on involved persons, the institution and the profession. In an era whereby evidence-based practice has been introduced to nursing, it behooves lecturers and students to ensure that they understand the nitty-gritties of the same. So, that the classmate did not appropriately quote and also refused to quite sources may negatively reflect on our nursing class. The concerned people may thus be viewed as lacking academic integrity and credibility hence their works cannot be trusted (In Bretag, 2015). Further, the university and the profession may also suffer negatively. A student producing plagiarized work may insinuate that the university does not produce graduates who meet professional expectations and that the profession does not have well-educated staff who can offer quality care modelled around ethical practices.
Applying Research Skills Scoring Guide
CRITERIA | NON-PERFORMANCE | BASIC | PROFICIENT | DISTINGUISHED |
---|---|---|---|---|
Apply academic peer reviewed journal articles relevant to the health care problem or issue being researched. | Does not describe academic peer reviewed journal articles related to the health care problem or issue being researched. | Describes academic peer reviewed journal articles related to the health care problem or issue being researched. | Applies academic peer reviewed journal articles relevant to the health care problem or issue being researched. | Applies academic peer reviewed journal articles relevant to the health care problem or issue being researched, including why the chosen articles are relevant to the topic. |
Assess the credibility of information and explain the relevance of the information sources. | Does not describe origin of information or relevant aspects of the information sources. | Describes a few of the origins of the information and relevant aspects of the information sources. | Assess the credibility of information and explain the relevance of the information sources. | Assesses the credibility of information, explaining the process used for determining the sources’ credibility, and explains the relevance of the information sources, providing the reasons for considering the sources relevant to the topic. |
Analyze academic peer-reviewed journal articles using the annotated bibliography organizational format. | Does not analyze academic peer-reviewed journal articles using the annotated bibliography organizational format. | Analyzes academic peer-reviewed journal articles but fails to use the annotated bibliography format effectively. | Analyzes academic peer-reviewed journal articles using the annotated bibliography organizational format. | Analyzes academic peer-reviewed journal articles using the annotated bibliography organizational format, and provides rationale for inclusion of each selected article. |
Summarize what was learned from developing an annotated bibliography. | Does not describe what was learned from developing the annotated bibliography. | Describes a portion of what was learned from developing the annotated bibliography. | Summarizes what was learned from developing an annotated bibliography. | Summarizes what was learned from developing the annotated bibliography, including examples. |
Produce text with minimal grammatical, usage, spelling, and mechanical errors. | Produces text with significant grammatical, usage, spelling, and mechanical errors, making text difficult to follow. | Produces text with some grammatical, usage, spelling, and mechanical errors, making text difficult to follow at times. | Produces text with minimal grammatical, usage, spelling, and mechanical errors. | Produces text free of grammatical, usage, spelling, and mechanical errors. |
Integrate into text appropriate use of scholarly sources, evidence, and citation style. | Does not integrate into text appropriate use of scholarly sources, evidence, and citation style. | Integrates into text mostly appropriate use of scholarly sources, evidence, and citation style, but there are lapses in style use. | Integrates into text appropriate use of scholarly sources, evidence, and citation style. | Integrates into text appropriate use of scholarly sources, evidence, and citation style without errors and uses current reference sources. |
Lopes Write Policy
For assignments that need to be submitted to Lopes Write, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me.
Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes.
Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own?
Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score.
Late Policy
The university’s policy on late assignments is 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies.
Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances.
If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect.
I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension.
As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading.
Communication
Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me:
Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class.
Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours.
Important information for writing discussion questions and participation
Welcome to class
Hello class and welcome to the class and I will be your instructor for this course. This is a -week course and requires a lot of time commitment, organization, and a high level of dedication. Please use the class syllabus to guide you through all the assignments required for the course. I have also attached the classroom policies to this announcement to know your expectations for this course. Please review this document carefully and ask me any questions if you do. You could email me at any time or send me a message via the “message” icon in halo if you need to contact me. I check my email regularly, so you should get a response within 24 hours. If you have not heard from me within 24 hours and need to contact me urgently, please send a follow up text to
I strongly encourage that you do not wait until the very last minute to complete your assignments. Your assignments in weeks 4 and 5 require early planning as you would need to present a teaching plan and interview a community health provider. I advise you look at the requirements for these assignments at the beginning of the course and plan accordingly. I have posted the YouTube link that explains all the class assignments in detail. It is required that you watch this 32-minute video as the assignments from week 3 through 5 require that you follow the instructions to the letter to succeed. Failure to complete these assignments according to instructions might lead to a zero. After watching the video, please schedule a one-on-one with me to discuss your topic for your project by the second week of class. Use this link to schedule a 15-minute session. Please, call me at the time of your appointment on my number. Please note that I will NOT call you.
Please, be advised I do NOT accept any assignments by email. If you are having technical issues with uploading an assignment, contact the technical department and inform me of the issue. If you have any issues that would prevent you from getting your assignments to me by the deadline, please inform me to request a possible extension. Note that working fulltime or overtime is no excuse for late assignments. There is a 5%-point deduction for every day your assignment is late. This only applies to approved extensions. Late assignments will not be accepted.
If you think you would be needing accommodations due to any reasons, please contact the appropriate department to request accommodations.
Plagiarism is highly prohibited. Please ensure you are citing your sources correctly using APA 7th edition. All assignments including discussion posts should be formatted in APA with the appropriate spacing, font, margin, and indents. Any papers not well formatted would be returned back to you, hence, I advise you review APA formatting style. I have attached a sample paper in APA format and will also post sample discussion responses in subsequent announcements.
Your initial discussion post should be a minimum of 200 words and response posts should be a minimum of 150 words. Be advised that I grade based on quality and not necessarily the number of words you post. A minimum of TWO references should be used for your initial post. For your response post, you do not need references as personal experiences would count as response posts. If you however cite anything from the literature for your response post, it is required that you cite your reference. You should include a minimum of THREE references for papers in this course. Please note that references should be no more than 5 years old except recommended as a resource for the class. Furthermore, for each discussion board question, you need ONE initial substantive response and TWO substantive responses to either your classmates or your instructor for a total of THREE responses. There are TWO discussion questions each week, hence, you need a total minimum of SIX discussion posts for each week. I usually post a discussion question each week. You could also respond to these as it would count towards your required SIX discussion posts for the week.
I understand this is a lot of information to cover in 5 weeks, however, the Bible says in Philippians 4:13 that we can do all things through Christ that strengthens us. Even in times like this, we are encouraged by God’s word that we have that ability in us to succeed with His strength. I pray that each and every one of you receives strength for this course and life generally as we navigate through this pandemic that is shaking our world today. Relax and enjoy the course!
Hi Class,
Please read through the following information on writing a Discussion question response and participation posts.
Contact me if you have any questions.
Important information on Writing a Discussion Question
- Your response needs to be a minimum of 150 words (not including your list of references)
- There needs to be at least TWO references with ONE being a peer reviewed professional journal article.
- Include in-text citations in your response
- Do not include quotes—instead summarize and paraphrase the information
- Follow APA-7th edition
- Points will be deducted if the above is not followed
Participation –replies to your classmates or instructor
- A minimum of 6 responses per week, on at least 3 days of the week.
- Each response needs at least ONE reference with citations—best if it is a peer reviewed journal article
- Each response needs to be at least 75 words in length (does not include your list of references)
- Responses need to be substantive by bringing information to the discussion or further enhance the discussion. Responses of “I agree” or “great post” does not count for the word count.
- Follow APA 7th edition
- Points will be deducted if the above is not followed
- Remember to use and follow APA-7th edition for all weekly assignments, discussion questions, and participation points.
- Here are some helpful links
- Student paper example
- Citing Sources
- The Writing Center is a great resource