Assignment: ETHICAL CONCERNS

Assignment: ETHICAL CONCERNS

 

 

           

Ethical Concerns

 

 

Student’s Name

Institution

Course

Lecturer’s Name

Date

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ethical Concerns

CASE STUDY II: A 49-year-old cancer patient named BC was taken into the emergency department after experiencing cardiac arrest. Her spouse and one of her kids also rode in the ambulance with her.

With clients who have received a fatal diagnosis, such as advanced-stage cancer, it is imperative to have a dialogue regarding end-of-life care and preferences. In this case, the patient arrives with cardiac arrest in the emergency room with a confirmation of an advanced-stage cancer diagnosis. Her spouse and child were all with her. An ECG result would be used to diagnose cardiac arrest, and then the ACLS procedure would be followed for life-saving actions (Molnar & Isaac, 2020). I would first check with the spouse to determine whether the patient has an advance directive or living will on her resuscitation status after the patient is stabilized. In a legal document called an “advanced directive,” a patient specifies their preferences for actions they would like taken to save their life in the event of a cardiac emergency. In the state of New Jersey, the next of kin, in this example, the patient’s spouse, would have the power to overturn the advanced directive’s instructions if the patient is asleep or incapable of making important decisions (Anderson, 2020). The patient would be stabilized to the best of our ability before resuscitation was ultimately decided upon.

The physician must honor the patient’s and family’s preferences in situations this grave. Additional investigation of the patient’s survival and brain function must be undertaken if the patient’s family accepts that they want all therapies, and the client is only sustained with life-supporting measures (Bak et al., 2018). To determine the extent of brain impairment and cardiovascular and pulmonary stability, the provider might use diagnostic tests to evaluate the patient’s state and survivability.

A brain death study that comprises a head CT scan, head MRI and EEGs can be carried out to determine if the patient has clinically significant brain damage. Brain death is the complete cessation of all brain processes, such are those in the brainstem. The three main indicators of brain death are brainstem reflexes not functioning, a coma, and apnea. Once this has been determined, the medical practitioner can discuss organ donation choices with the patient’s family as well as ending life support and changing the client’s resuscitation stance to do not resuscitate. Before changing the patient’s status against their preferences, professionals should make every effort to acquire the family’s approval to avoid moral dilemmas.

 

 

References

Anderson, P. L. (2020). Family Involvement: What Does a Loved One Want at the End of Life? Surgical Decision Making in Geriatrics, 399–407. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47963-3_31

Bak, M. A. R., Blom, M. T., Tan, H. L., & Willems, D. L. (2018). Ethical aspects of sudden cardiac arrest research using observational data: a narrative review. Critical Care, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-018-2153-3

Molnar, A., & Isaac, M. (2020). Palliative and End-of-Life Care. Refugee Health Care, 181–192. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47668-7_12

Spagnolo, A. G., Corsano, B., & Sacchini, D. (2021). Shared Decision-Making at the End of Life. Emergency Laparoscopic Surgery in the Elderly and Frail Patient, 335–342. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79990-8_36

 

‌

 

‌