Assignment: Enhance the student’s clinical reasoning, confidence and learning of various pediatric and women health topics through facilitated discussion NUR602

Assignment: Enhance the student’s clinical reasoning, confidence and learning of various pediatric and women health topics through facilitated discussion NUR602

Assignment: Enhance the student’s clinical reasoning, confidence and learning of various pediatric and women health topics through facilitated discussion NUR602

Grand Rounds

Guidelines with Scoring Rubric

Purpose

The purpose of this assignment is to enhance the student’s clinical reasoning, confidence and learning of various pediatric and women health topics through facilitated discussion.

Description

In Weeks 2 and 6, you will create a Grand Rounds presentation on the topic assigned to you by the faculty member.

Course Outcomes

Through this assignment, the student will demonstrate the ability to:

1. Describe the most commonly prescribed drugs use in primary care for the chose condition.

2. Utilize clinical guidelines, research articles or other materials to support your findings.

3. Identify any practice barriers, issues, or problems (including cultural diversity and healthcare literacy).

4. Discuss best practices for optimal outcomes.

Due Dates:

Women’s Health Grand Rounds due Week 6 (please see specific days/timesbelow)

Total Points Possible:

Week 6 – 150 points

Requirements:

Keep in mind the following guidelines and grading criteria while taking part in this assignment:

The Grand Rounds presentation will consist of a patient scenario that is assigned to you by your faculty in week one. The presentation is a video recording in Kaltura . Recording of the presentation should be interesting, professional, and focused to the topic. Wear your lab coat and name tag/badge during the recording.

Record and upload presentation by Tuesday, 11:59 p.m. MT. Begin facilitating discussion and continue to lead it throughout the week.

Participate in ongoing interactive dialogue by responding to a minimal of two (2) of your peer’s discussion questions by Friday, 11:59 p.m.

Assignment Enhance the student’s clinical reasoning, confidence and learning of various pediatric and women health topics through facilitated discussion NUR602
Assignment Enhance the student’s clinical reasoning, confidence and learning of various pediatric and women health topics through facilitated discussion NUR602

MT.

Participate in all faculty directed questions to your presentation by Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT.

Utilize a minimal of three peer reviewed scholarly articles from Chamberlain Online Library and a minimal of 2 current (within last 5 years) evidence based clinical guidelines to support your findings.

Discuss Pathophysiology, epidemiology, risk factors, clinical physical assessment findings of the assigned topic.

List and discuss a minimal of three (3) differential diagnoses.

Discuss any diagnostic studies to confirm diagnosis of
assigned topic

Discuss prevention (if not applicable, discuss why).

Discuss Treatment including nonpharmacologic management and pharmacologic management

Discuss patient and/or family education.

Discuss best practices for optimal outcomes.

By Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT – In addition to submitting your presentation, you will also need to lead a discussion on your topic in the
discussion thread. The initial post and
Kaltura presentation are both due by Wednesday 11:59 p.m. MT. NOTE: By Wednesday, you will also initiate a discussion to lead.

Discussion Lead Requirement: Develop three (3) questions on
your topic you can ask to initiate the discussion and keep it going.

By Friday, 11:59 p.m. MT, respond substantively to a minimal
of two (2) peers’ presentation questions **If all students have a response,
then choose the student with the least responses to their posting.

By Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT, summarize your grand rounds
presentation by posting a summary reply to your initial post in the discussion
thread. Summarize the discussion as well
as conclusions from the collective group discussion. Include evidence based references at the
bottom of the summary AND respond to ALL faculty questions regarding your
presentation.

Grand Rounds Presentation Criteria

Category

Points

Description

Introduction

20

Introduction of topic that include pathophysiology,
epidemiology, and risk factors.

Clinical Assessment

5

Discussed typical clinical assessment findings for chosen
topic.

Differential Diagnoses

20

List AND discuss of a minimal of three (3) differential
diagnoses with scholarly support.

Diagnostic Studies/Labs

10

Discuss diagnostic studies and labs that can be used to
confirm diagnosis.

Prevention and Treatment Options

10

Discuss prevention and treatment options for chosen topic.

Education

10

Discuss patient and family education.

Identify Outcomes

10

Discuss best practices for optimal outcomes.

Lead Discussion

10

Facilitate discussion relevant to the presentation topic by
incorporating three (3) discussion question for peers.

Interactive Dialogue with Student Peers

10

By Friday, 11:59 p.m. MT, Interactive dialogue with at least
two peer’s initial presentation by responding substantively to all questions
posed and citing related research to support.

Summary Requirement

10

By Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT, add summary post to own grand
rounds presentation that summarizes the discussion. Include conclusions from the collective group
discussion on the topic.

Evidence Based Research/Articles

10

Include minimal of three (3) evidence based research and/or
Peer Reviewed articles from Chamberlain Online Library.

Evidence Based Practice Clinical Guidelines

10

Include a minimal of two (2) current (within last 5 years)
EBP clinical guidelines.

Interactive Dialogue with Faculty

10

Responds to ALL faculty directed questions on initial
presentation. Includes scholarly support from EBP clinical guidelines and/or
peer reviewed journal articles obtained from Chamberlain Online Library.

Presentation Development

5

Overall Presentation is clear, concise, and organized;
demonstrated ethical scholarship in accurate representation and attribution of
sources; recorded in Kaltura. Labcoat and name badge are present.

Total

150

A quality assignment will meet or exceed all of the above
requirements.

Grand Rounds

Guidelines with Scoring Rubric

Purpose

The purpose of this assignment is to enhance the student’s
clinical reasoning, confidence and learning of various pediatric and women
health topics through facilitated discussion.

Description

In Weeks 2 and 6, you will create a Grand Rounds
presentation on the topic assigned to you by the faculty member.

Course Outcomes

Through this assignment, the student will demonstrate the
ability to:

1. Describe the
most commonly prescribed drugs use in primary care for the chose condition.

2. Utilize clinical
guidelines, research articles or other materials to support your findings.

3. Identify any
practice barriers, issues, or problems (including cultural diversity and
healthcare literacy).

4. Discuss best
practices for optimal outcomes.

Due Dates:

Women’s Health Grand Rounds due Week 6 (please see specific days/times
below)

Total Points Possible:

Week 6 – 150 points

Requirements:

Keep in mind the following guidelines and grading criteria
while taking part in this assignment:

The Grand Rounds presentation will consist of a patient
scenario that is assigned to you by your faculty in week one. The presentation is a video recording in
Kaltura. Recording of the presentation
should be interesting, professional, and focused to the topic. Wear your lab
coat and name tag/badge during the recording.

Record and upload presentation by Tuesday, 11:59 p.m. MT.
Begin facilitating discussion and continue to lead it throughout the week.

Participate in ongoing interactive dialogue by responding to
a minimal of two (2) of your peer’s discussion questions by Friday, 11:59 p.m.
MT.

Participate in all faculty directed questions to your
presentation by Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT.

Utilize a minimal of three peer reviewed scholarly articles
from Chamberlain Online Library and a minimal of 2 current (within last 5
years) evidence based clinical guidelines to support your findings.

Discuss Pathophysiology, epidemiology, risk factors,
clinical physical assessment findings of the assigned topic.

List and discuss a minimal of three (3) differential
diagnoses.

Discuss any diagnostic studies to confirm diagnosis of
assigned topic

Discuss prevention (if not applicable, discuss why).

Discuss Treatment including nonpharmacologic management and
pharmacologic management

Discuss patient and/or family education.

Discuss best practices for optimal outcomes.

By Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT – In addition to submitting your
presentation, you will also need to lead a discussion on your topic in the
discussion thread. The initial post and
Kaltura presentation are both due by Wednesday 11:59 p.m. MT. NOTE: By Wednesday, you will also initiate a
discussion to lead.

Discussion Lead Requirement: Develop three (3) questions on
your topic you can ask to initiate the discussion and keep it going.

By Friday, 11:59 p.m. MT, respond substantively to a minimal
of two (2) peers’ presentation questions **If all students have a response,
then choose the student with the least responses to their posting.

By Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT, summarize your grand rounds
presentation by posting a summary reply to your initial post in the discussion
thread. Summarize the discussion as well
as conclusions from the collective group discussion. Include evidence based references at the
bottom of the summary AND respond to ALL faculty questions regarding your
presentation.

Grand Rounds Presentation Criteria

Category

Points

Description

Introduction

20

Introduction of topic that include pathophysiology,
epidemiology, and risk factors.

Clinical Assessment

5

Discussed typical clinical assessment findings for chosen
topic.

Differential Diagnoses

20

List AND discuss of a minimal of three (3) differential
diagnoses with scholarly support.

Diagnostic Studies/Labs

10

Discuss diagnostic studies and labs that can be used to
confirm diagnosis.

Prevention and Treatment Options

10

Discuss prevention and treatment options for chosen topic.

Education

10

Discuss patient and family education.

Identify Outcomes

10

Discuss best practices for optimal outcomes.

Lead Discussion

10

Facilitate discussion relevant to the presentation topic by
incorporating three (3) discussion question for peers.

Interactive Dialogue with Student Peers

10

By Friday, 11:59 p.m. MT, Interactive dialogue with at least
two peer’s initial presentation by responding substantively to all questions
posed and citing related research to support.

Summary Requirement

10

By Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT, add summary post to own grand
rounds presentation that summarizes the discussion. Include conclusions from the collective group
discussion on the topic.

Evidence Based Research/Articles

10

Include minimal of three (3) evidence based research and/or
Peer Reviewed articles from Chamberlain Online Library.

Evidence Based Practice Clinical Guidelines

10

Include a minimal of two (2) current (within last 5 years)
EBP clinical guidelines.

Interactive Dialogue with Faculty

10

Responds to ALL faculty directed questions on initial
presentation. Includes scholarly support from EBP clinical guidelines and/or
peer reviewed journal articles obtained from Chamberlain Online Library.

Presentation Development

5

Overall Presentation is clear, concise, and organized; demonstrated ethical scholarship in accurate representation and attribution of sources; recorded in Kaltura. Labcoat and name badge are present.

Total

150

A quality assignment will meet or exceed all of the above
requirements.

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS:Assignment: Enhance the student’s clinical reasoning, confidence and learning of various pediatric and women health topics through facilitated discussion NUR602

 

Assignment: Enhance the student’s clinical reasoning, confidence and learning of various pediatric and women health topics through facilitated discussion NUR602 Grading Rubric

Performance Category 100% or highest level of performance

100%

16 points

Very good or high level of performance

88%

14 points

Acceptable level of performance

81%

13 points

Inadequate demonstration of expectations

68%

11 points

Deficient level of performance

56%

9 points

 

Failing level

of performance

55% or less

0 points

 Total Points Possible= 50           16 Points    14 Points 13 Points        11 Points           9 Points          0 Points
Scholarliness

Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic topics.

Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:

  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements:

  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in all of the following elements:

  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
 

Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one of the following elements:

  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
 

Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements:

  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three or more of the following elements

  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information
 16 Points  14 Points  13 Points 11 Points 9 Points  0 Points
Application of Course Knowledge

Demonstrate the ability to analyze and apply principles, knowledge and information learned in the outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations

Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:

  • Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements:

  • Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements:

  • Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one of the following elements:

  • Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from and scholarly resources to a professional experience.
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements:

  • Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three of the following elements

  • Applies principles, knowledge and information and scholarly resources to the required topic.
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned scholarly resources to a professional experience.
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
   10 Points 9 Points  6 Points  0 Points
Interactive Dialogue

Initial post should be a minimum of 300 words (references do not count toward word count)

The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each (references do not count toward word count)

Responses are substantive and relate to the topic.

Demonstrated all of the following:

  • Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words.
  • The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each.
  • Responses are substantive
  • Responses are related to the topic of discussion.
Demonstrated 3 of the following:

  • Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words.
  • The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each.
  • Responses are substantive
  • Responses are related to the topic of discussion.
Demonstrated 2 of the following:

  • Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words.
  • The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each.
  • Responses are substantive
  • Responses are related to the topic of discussion.
Demonstrated 1 or less of the following:

  • Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words.
  • The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each.
  • Responses are substantive
  • Responses are related to the topic of discussion.
  8 Points 7 Points  6 Points         5 Points          4 Points  0 Points
Grammar, Syntax, APA

Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing.

The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition

Error is defined to be a unique APA error. Same type of error is only counted as one error.

The following was present:

  • 0-3 errors in APA format

AND

  • Responses have 0-3 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors

AND

  • Writing style is generally clear, focused on topic,and facilitates communication.
The following was present:

  • 4-6 errors in APA format.

AND/OR

  • Responses have 4-5 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors

AND/OR

  • Writing style is somewhat focused on topic.
The following was present:

  • 7-9 errors in APA format.

AND/OR

  • Responses have 6-7 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors

AND/OR

  • Writing style is slightly focused on topic making discussion difficult to understand.
 

The following was present:

  • 10- 12 errors in APA format

AND/OR

  • Responses have 8-9 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors

AND/OR

  • Writing style is not focused on topic, making discussion difficult to understand.
 

The following was present:

  • 13 – 15 errors in APA format

AND/OR

  • Responses have 8-10 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors

AND/OR

  • Writing style is not focused on topic, making discussion difficult to understand.

AND/OR

  • The student continues to make repeated mistakes in any of the above areas after written correction by the instructor.
The following was present:

  • 16 to greater errors in APA format.

AND/OR

  • Responses have more than 10 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors.

AND/OR

  • Writing style does not facilitate communication
  0 Points Deducted 5 Points Lost
Participation

Requirements

Demonstrated the following:

  • Initial, peer, and faculty postings were made on 3 separate days
Failed to demonstrate the following:

  • Initial, peer, and faculty postings were made on 3 separate days
  0 Points Lost 5 Points Lost
Due Date Requirements Demonstrated all of the following:

  • The initial posting to the graded threaded discussion topic is posted within the course no later than Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT.

A minimum of one peer and one instructor responses are to be posted within the course no later than Sunday, 11:59 pm MT.

Demonstrates one or less of the following.

  • The initial posting to the graded threaded discussion topic is posted within the course no later than Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT.

A minimum of one peer and one instructor responses are to be posted within the course no later than Sunday, 11:59 pm MT.