Want create site? With Free visual composer you can do it easy.

Assignment: Contemporary Organization Evaluation LDR 615

Assignment: Contemporary Organization Evaluation LDR 615

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: Assignment: Contemporary Organization Evaluation LDR 615

Contemporary Organization Change

The dynamism of the healthcare environment implies that healthcare organizations always have to the competence necessary to handle the complexity of the process. The process entails evaluating, planning, and executing operations, tactics, and strategies so as to make the change worthwhile. The complexity of the healthcare system alongside the

Assignment Contemporary Organization Evaluation LDR 615

Assignment Contemporary Organization Evaluation LDR 615

need to constantly produce quality and safe healthcare services means that healthcare organizations always face change events. The advent of evidence-based practice calling for the adoption of technology in various facets of healthcare has ensured that technology has disrupted the way facilities undertake matters. The present paper will thus examine the manner in which the University of Texas Medical has responded to technological disruption caused by EHR and its response to the change dynamics therein.

Assignment: Contemporary Organization Evaluation LDR 615


Organization and Change

            The University of Texas Medical Branch consists of a healthcare system encompassing both research as well as emergency services on four of its campuses. The organization offers a network of specialty and primary care clinics, walk-in services and emergency care, as well as interprofessional collaboration entailing physicians and nurses among other healthcare professionals. The University of Texas Medical Branch has facilities that support both long-term and short-term care needs of numerous conditions from maternal issues to trauma cases (“Health care at UTMB”, n.d). The vast nature of the facilities comprising the UTMB demanded for the existence of a centralized way of addressing patient issues in terms of data leveraging. Assignment: Contemporary Organization Evaluation LDR 615

UTMB provides itself in using advances in medicine to properly serve the Texas communities. In alignment with the above assertion, the facility currently responds to the healthcare disruptions caused by technology by adopting the use of electronic healthcare records to centralize patient data (Adler-Milstein et al., 2017). The UTMB purposes to ensure that it has a comprehensive EHR unit in all its facilities and clinical units. The desire to improve patient services and lead in evidence-based practice adoption by the UTMB has pushed it to embrace the technological disruption caused by EHR. By leveraging EHR and its innumerable benefits, the UMTB expects to improve the quality and safety of services that it offers to the Texas community.


Effects of Change

            The adoption of electronic health records by UMTB led to certain disruptions of the healthcare system at the facility. The disruptions witnessed align with the assertion made by Jacobs et al. (2019) that the formative stages of comprehensive EHR implementation form the most disruptive period. The UMTB experienced physician dissatisfaction following the implementation of comprehensive EHR system due to the absence of concomitant skills. Moreover, the execution of the comprehensive HER system led to the presence of reduced quality due to the disruption that it caused to the workflow (Busch, Bates, & Rauch, 2018). The waiting time of patients reduced in a statistically significant manner since the healthcare providers grappled with the complexity of the system. In other words, the adoption of the EHR system by the UMTB led to the presence of disruptions that affected the quality of care offered by the hospital to its patients.

In order to address the above disruptions, the UMTB turned to evidence-based practices related to adoption of a change process. The first step entailed the organization ensuring stakeholder involvement after reviewing the project after the first month (Jacobs et al., 2017). UMTB formulated a project organization comprising of physicians, nurse managers, nurses and essentially broad participation of every hospital department. During this period, the project team appointed key users who discussed a transparent list of issues weekly so as to solve them and ensure project ownership.

Moreover, UMTB chose to increase the competence of its workforce as relates to the operations of the comprehensive EHR system that it adopted. They achieved this through strategies such as group trainings to allow for optimum training of personnel through determining the optimum hours required for the same. Further, UMTB also introduced the provision of real-time support to personnel to leverage the optimum learning potential for the personnel at the facility. Moreover, the UMBT addressed the workflow disruption by having the vendor to re-assess their models and align them to the organizational requirements (Jacobs et al., 2019). The UMBT conducted successive review days entailing the assessment of the progress by a workgroup. Assignment: Contemporary Organization Evaluation LDR 615

In lieu of the above strategies, UMBT star ted seeing numerous changes related to the adoption of the EHR. The workforce bought into the idea of change and participated in trainings to improve its competence level (Busch, Bates, & Rauch, 2018). The above enthusiasm allowed the organization to register improved physician and patient satisfaction. Moreover, the stratagems led to the improvement of workflow, which ensured the presence of improved quality of services. Further, the waiting times improved and overall quality parameters of the hospital enhanced.


            The adoption of the EHR, similar to any change, faced certain resistance from various stakeholders. The nurses and other medical personnel felt left out of the matter and hence they did not feel like they owned the project. This resulted in a go slow during the first month of the project. Moreover, the EHR did not have a competent clinician champion, who resisted in due to lack of participation in the initial stages. The initial assigned project manager did not have the necessary skills and knowledge and hence resisted the adoption of certain aspects of the EHR. The rejected aspects of the project fell under the complex category.

The UMTB responded to the stakeholder change through various evidence-based practice. To address the issue of resistance by clinician champions, the hospital appointed a more knowledgeable clinician champion who solidified provider support through clearly identifying the way that the EHR would become useful in improving quality. The UMBT also adopted the “train the trainer” approach to train clinicians concerning various aspects of the EHR. Using the model, the vendor identified super-users within the organization and trained them, who in turn trained their colleagues. Moreover, the UMBT allowed clinicians to design and redesign the workflow process, hence making them support the EHR change and also address the workflow challenges.

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: Assignment: Contemporary Organization Evaluation LDR 615

Assignment: Contemporary Organization Evaluation LDR 615  Effects of Change on Interdepartmental Collaboration

            Since the introduction of the EHR, interdepartmental collaboration has improved within the UMBT departments. The change as produced by the EHR has led to improved collaboration between the nursing department and other departments at the hospitals in terms of medication management and other patient aspects. The EHR has improved patient management across the continuum of care from admission to discharge with wait times reducing dramatically. Moreover, the EHR has introduced the usage of clinical decision support at the facility, which has made easier decisions made by clinicians concerning patient welfare by referring them to necessary units (Busch, Bates, & Rauch, 2018). Therefore, the EHR system had created a seamless interdepartmental association between various units at the UMBT.

Evaluation of the Responses of the Leaders

            The leadership of the organization initially did not adequately prepare for the change. They thought that the personnel had sufficient goodwill to support the change. However, upon the realization that resistance to change existed, the strategies implemented by the leadership worked. For instance, the usage of train the trainer strategy made certain that all the personnel possessed requisite skills, which greatly influenced their embracing of the project (Reyes-Portillo et al., 2018). Moreover, allowing the personnel the latitude to design and redesign the model ensured that the final product had consistency with the desired product hence improved workflow at the facility. The resolution to change the project manager to a knowledgeable person similarly produced the desired results. Therefore, the leadership adopted effective responses in relation to resistance to the proposed change that the facility witnessed at the beginning.


            The adoption of the EHR by the facility due to the HITACH Act occurred in a manner characterized by challenges. However, the leadership of the UMBT can undertake certain steps to address the resistance to change at the facility. The leadership may have to identify a couple of clinician champions and then define their roles (Adler-Milstein et al., 2017). Moreover, the leadership ought to include clinical champions in tactical decision making so as to avoid errors as well as complex judgment calls that affect the personnel. Lastly, the leadership should formulate a framework that would enable clear and rapid communication concerning the health IT within the organization


Adler-Milstein, J., Holmgren, A. J., Kralovec, P., Worzala, C., Searcy, T., & Patel, V. (2017). Electronic health record adoption in US hospitals: the emergence of a digital “advanced use” divide. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 24(6), 1142-1148.

Busch, A. B., Bates, D. W., & Rauch, S. L. (2018). Improving Electronic Health Record Adoption in Psychiatric Care: A Cornerstone for Healthcare Transformation. The New England journal of medicine, 378(18), 1665.

Health care at UTMB health. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.utmbhealth.com/servicelines

Jacobs, M., Boersma, L. J., Swart, R., Mannens, R., Reymen, B., Körver, F., … & Dekker, A. (2019). Electronic Health Record implementation in a large academic radiotherapy department: Temporarily disruptions but long-term benefits. International journal of medical informatics, 129, 342-348.

Reyes-Portillo, J. A., Chin, E. M., Toso-Salman, J., Turner, J. B., Vawdrey, D., & Mufson, L. (2018, June). Using electronic health record alerts to increase safety planning with youth at-risk for suicide: A non-randomized trial. In Child & Youth Care Forum (Vol. 47, No. 3, pp. 391-402). Springer US. Assignment: Contemporary Organization Evaluation LDR 615

Topic 5 DQ 2

May 2-6, 2022

Discuss the importance of advocacy as it pertains to patient care. What is the nurse’s role in patient advocacy? Describe a situation in which you were involved with patient advocacy. Explain what the advocacy accomplished for the patient, and what the repercussions would have been if the patient would not have had an advocate.




Advocacy as it pertains to patient care is a very big part of what being a nurse is. Advocacy for patients is deeply rooted in the nursing profession and a lot of what we do revolves around just that, advocating for our patients. When nurses advocate for themselves within the profession they are in turn advocating for their patients, every type of advocacy that nurses do ultimately falls back to one principle, what is safe for the patient. It is important that nurses work together, across employment settings and roles, to advocate on behalf of colleagues and the profession. Nurses comprise the largest professional group within health care and have been recognized by the public as the most trusted profession (Tomajan, 2012). Advocacy for patient care is important because it keeps the safety of our patients at first hand. As the world changes around us and the health care environment continues to change and evolve, the profession of nursing must mold to what is safest for our patients and that always finds a foundation in patient advocacy. This is where first hand nursing experience with patients comes in, nurses can use their voice and experience to let policy makers know what is working or not working, and even so become the policy makers if they wish. Advocacy starts with good communication between nurse and patient and continues on to good communication between nurse and other disciplines in the health care system. When nurses advocate for patients, stand up for patients’ rights, or work to meet their need for care, that nurse is actively assuming the role of patient advocate (Helbig 2018). When working in the Emergency Department I came across a situation where I found myself actively being the patients advocate at time of discharge. I was caring for an elderly patient who was living in a senior care assisted living center that had come to see us in the ED for a broken wrist from a fall. As I assessed the patient and the time with the patient went on it became apparent after assessment that the patient was suffering from elder abuse. The doctor cleared the patients medically and was ready to discharge the patient back to the same senior care home with a splinted broken wrist with orders to follow up with and orthopedist as soon as possible. As the nurse I advocated for this patient by reporting the elder abuse as well as collaborating with the social worker and the patients family to seek out a new assisted living care home for this patient to go to. Overall through my thorough assessment I was able to learn about possible elder abuse of this patient, report it to the proper authorities as a mandatory reporter and seek better care on behalf of my patient. If I was not a diligent nurse in this patient advocacy situation this patient could have ended up right back where they were and in harms way, also if I did not report this, unreported abuse could be potentially happening to many more elder people at this assisted living care home. As nurses we must always advocate for our patients and continue to be mandatory reporters in order to protect our patients.

Helbig, J. (2018). Professional Engagement. Dynamics in Nursing: Art and Science of Professional Practice. https://www.gcumedia.com/digital-resources/grand-canyon-university/2018/dynamics-in-nursing_art-and-science-of-professional-practice_1e.php


Tomajan, K. (2012). Advocating for nurses and nursing. OJIN: Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 17. Retrieved from http://www.nursingworld.org/MainMenuCategories/ANAMarketplace/ANAPeriodicals/OJIN/TableofContents/Vol-17-2012/No1-Jan-2012/Advocating-for-Nurses.html



You make a great point about how patient advocacy starts with communication between the nurse and patient. It also continues with the nurse and doctor while the care plan is being discussed (Helbig, 2018). Out of the whole health care team, nurses spend the most time with the patients and in my opinion, understands and values patient’s desires and needs. Also, wow you are an amazing nurse for saving that patient from elder abuse! It is so unfortunate how common elder abuse really is. You made such an impact on that patient’s life, great example of advocacy!

Helbig, J. (2018). Professional Engagement. Dynamics in Nursing: Art and Science of Professional Practice. https://www.gcumedia.com/digital-resources/grand-canyon-university/2018/dynamics-in-nursing_art-and-science-of-professional-practice_1e.php


This is insightful. In nursing practice, advocacy involves promoting or respecting human dignity, enhancing patient equality in the course of healthcare delivery and providing freedom from suffering (Abbasinia et al., 2020). Advocacy is part and parcel of healthcare delivery processes. The whole process involves the provision of guidelines that govern different nursing practices. There are different cases or examples of nursing advocacy. For instance, lending patients’ ears and providing additional information to enhance healthcare delivery processes are examples of nurse advocacy (Liz, 2019). Nurse’s play significant roles in nursing advocacy; they always develop policies and guidelines that are useful in ensuring effective patient’s outcomes in the treatment process. With their expertise and experiences, nurses are able to establish different practices that ensure quality treatment processes. However, there are barriers associated with nurse advocacy; for instance, some nurses receive little or no support from the management of administrators and other healthcare professionals (Rosa et al., 2019). Through nursing advocacy, healthcare professionals have been able to achieve quality healthcare practices.

Did you find apk for android? You can find new Free Android Games and apps.