Assignment: Assessing and Treating Clients With Dementia Essay

Assignment: Assessing and Treating Clients With Dementia Essay

A Sample Answer For the Assignment: Assignment: Assessing and Treating Clients With Dementia Essay

Title:  Assignment: Assessing and Treating Clients With Dementia Essay

Dementia is a medical condition that is mainly associated with advanced age. It is characterized by a severe decline in mental ability affecting individual’s daily life. The symptoms of dementia include amnesia, aphasia, apraxia, agnosia, and impairment of executive functions such as problem-solving. Alzheimer’s disease which is a progressive neurodegenerative mental condition is the most common form of dementia (Korytkowska & Obler, 2016). It leads to problems affecting the patient’s memory, ability to reason, learn, communicate, carry out daily activities and make a judgment. Cure for Alzheimer’s disease has not yet been discovered. However, several medications can be used to manage the symptoms.

The case study provided is of an Iranian male 76 years of age who was brought in to the hospital by his eldest son, complaining of “strange behavior.”  His son reported that the strange behavior and thoughts started about two years ago, and have been getting worse ever since. His family also reported some changes in his personality such as loss of interest in religious activities, becoming forgetful, lack of seriousness in things that matter, the inability of communicating effectively and inability to stick to one topic during a conversation. As per the mini-mental examination that was conducted, the patient had a score of 18/30 with a deficit in orientation, attention, calculation, registration, and recall, which are all indicators of moderate dementia. The main purpose of this paper is to assess and come up with a treatment plan for the patient with dementia with keen considerations of the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of the available psychotropic agents for necessary intervention, in addition to legal and ethical considerations.

 

Decision Point One

Selected Decision

Start 5mg Aricept (donepezil) PO at bedtime

Reason for SelectionAssignment  Assessing and Treating Clients With Dementia Essay

Aricept (donepezil) is a cholinesterase inhibitor approved by the FDA for the treatment of cognitive symptoms such as confusion, memory loss, and inability to think and reason appropriately as associated with Alzheimer’s disease. The mode of action of Aricept is through preventing the breakdown of acetylcholine which as an important second messenger in learning and memory. The levels of acetylcholine in the brain are thus elevated hence relieving the cognitive symptoms associated with dementia. Donepezil is metabolized by CYP450 2D6 and CYP450 3A4, which are positive for Iranians such as the patient, with an elimination half-life of approximately 70 hours (Behrens et al., 2018). The side effects of Aricept are quite mild and self-limiting such as nausea and vomiting, increased bowel movement frequency and anorexia. Based on its long duration of action and the first onset of action among other pharmacokinetic properties, Aricept is administered at a dose of 5 to 10 mg at bedtime, with a starting dose of 5mg daily which may be increased to 10 mg daily after 4 to 6 weeks, based on the patient’s compliance. Given that the patient experience memory loss, a less frequently administered drug was the best choice for managing his condition.

Other available options such as 1.5mg Exelon (rivastigmine) PO, BD with an increasing dose to 3mg PO, BD in two weeks and

4mg Razadyne (galantamine) PO, BD were not the best choices, particularly for this patient. In as much as they belong to the same group, they have more severe side effects such as diarrhea, seizures, trouble urinating, severe abdominal pain, fainting, and tremors. They also have a short duration of action and hence administered twice a day, thus not appropriate for a patient experiencing memory loss.

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: Assignment: Assessing and Treating Clients With Dementia Essay

Expected Results

The patient is expected to show an improved baseline in memory or behavior within a period of 4 to 6 weeks (Behrens et al., 2018). He is also expected to improve cognitive symptoms and start experiencing an increased interest in daily activities, improved communication, and maintaining a conversation, improved reasoning, reduced instances of forgetfulness and improved reasoning. His MMSE score is also expected to increase.

Differences between Expected Results and Actual Results

Upon visiting the hospital after four weeks, the patient was accompanied by his son, who complained that the symptoms of his father were not improving. His son claimed that the drug was not working, and his father still had no interest in taking part in religious services and activities and continued exhibiting strange behavior with the MMSE score still at 18/30. This was entirely unexpected, but it might have been as a result of the 5mg dose which might be below the therapeutic index of the patient.

Decision Point Two

Selected Decision

Increase the 5mg dose of Aricept to 10mg PO at bedtime.

Reason for Selection

Based on the results after the first intervention, the patient showed no response to the drug, with no side effects reported, showing the dose was below the therapeutic index. The dose should thus be increased to a maximum for its effect to be enjoyed by the patient. Given that the patient did not prove non-compliant to the drug, changing the medication to Raza dyne (galantamine) ER 24 mg PO or Namenda (memantine) ER 28 mg PO would not be appropriate as it will only confuse the patient and lose his trust in the medication in case such a case reoccurs (Behrens et al., 2018). The drugs might also elicit inappropriate side effects that might further worsen than patient condition. Thus, the most appropriate intervention to make is to continue with the same drug but increase the dose to 10 mg for the therapeutic effect to be realized maximumly (Keough, King, & Lemmerman, 2016).

Expected Results

The patient is expected to report improved symptoms of dementia within 4 to 6 weeks after the intervention. He should be able to have regained interest in taking part in daily activities such as going to church, improved memory, improved reasoning, improved ability to maintain a conversation and able to communicate effectively. His MMSE scores are also expected to increase.

Differences between Expected Results and Actual Results

Upon coming back to the hospital after for weeks, the patient accompanied by his son seemed to be in a much better state. His son reported that the patient was tolerant to the medication, with minimal reduction of symptoms and no side effects. He was able to go to church which most of the family members were proud of. However, his son still states that the patient is still amused by certain things that were previously serious to him. The results were better than before but still under the nurse’s expectations.

Decision Point Three

Selected Decision

Continue the same 10mg dose of Aricept PO, at bedtime

Reason for Selection

The results reported by the patient were an indication that the drug was working. The patient was also tolerant to the medication with no side effects. Consequently, a dose of 23 mg is only recommended only if the patient has taken the 10mg dose for at least three months which is not the case. Hence, the best intervention is for the client to continue with the same dose as it will take time for all the symptoms to be resolved entirely. Increasing the dose of Aricept to 15 mg PO at bedtime for six weeks, then increasing it further to 20 mg, or to discontinue it and start Namenda 5mg PO daily is not appropriate at this time, as a higher dose might elicit side effects that might compromise the patients’ health even further. Previous studies show that Aricept can take up to several months before its effects stabilize in managing the patient’s condition (Schutz et al., 2019). Thus, discontinuing the drug is inappropriate. However, adding Namenda to the current regimen might be appropriate as NMDA receptor antagonists are usually used together with cholinesterase inhibitors in the management of Alzheimer’s disease to improve the therapeutic effects and minimize the undesired effect.

Expected Results

The patient is expected to improve the cognitive symptoms of Alzheimer’s disease within 4 to 6 weeks. His interest in daily activities is expected to improve maximumly within this period. He is also expected to have improved concentration and memory with minimal side effects. His MMSE score is also expected to improve.

Differences between Expected Results and Actual Results

After four weeks, the patient came back to the hospital with improved symptoms. He was able to maintain a good conversation and participate actively in religious activities. His memory also improved with maximumly reduced symptoms of “strange activities.” His MMSE scores had also improved as expected (Behrens et al., 2018).

Conclusion with Ethical Considerations

Managing dementia is complex given the wide range of the available therapeutic option besides similar sign and symptoms just like other mental disorders. Ethical considerations require the nurse to involve the patient family members in his care plan for an effective outcome. The patient must also be involved in every intervention with a clear explanation of the options, side effects and the reasons behind certain choices being made (Mauk, 2017). Generally, adherence to medication greatly depends on the pharmacological and pharmacokinetic properties of the drugs for the best choices to be made to boost both the patients physical and mental health.

cite scholarly resources including peer-review journals and current practice guidelines
 Please, all bullets points, bold, red and highlighted area must be attended to.
 A clear purpose statement (The purpose of this paper is to…) is required in the introduction of all writings

Lopes Write Policy

For assignments that need to be submitted to Lopes Write, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me.

Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes.

Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own?

Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score.

Late Policy

The university’s policy on late assignments is 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies.

Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances.

If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect.

I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension.

As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading.

Communication

Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me:

Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class.

Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours.

Important information for writing discussion questions and participation

Welcome to class

Hello class and welcome to the class and I will be your instructor for this course. This is a -week course and requires a lot of time commitment, organization, and a high level of dedication. Please use the class syllabus to guide you through all the assignments required for the course. I have also attached the classroom policies to this announcement to know your expectations for this course. Please review this document carefully and ask me any questions if you do. You could email me at any time or send me a message via the “message” icon in halo if you need to contact me. I check my email regularly, so you should get a response within 24 hours. If you have not heard from me within 24 hours and need to contact me urgently, please send a follow up text to

I strongly encourage that you do not wait until the very last minute to complete your assignments. Your assignments in weeks 4 and 5 require early planning as you would need to present a teaching plan and interview a community health provider. I advise you look at the requirements for these assignments at the beginning of the course and plan accordingly. I have posted the YouTube link that explains all the class assignments in detail. It is required that you watch this 32-minute video as the assignments from week 3 through 5 require that you follow the instructions to the letter to succeed. Failure to complete these assignments according to instructions might lead to a zero. After watching the video, please schedule a one-on-one with me to discuss your topic for your project by the second week of class. Use this link to schedule a 15-minute session. Please, call me at the time of your appointment on my number. Please note that I will NOT call you.

Please, be advised I do NOT accept any assignments by email. If you are having technical issues with uploading an assignment, contact the technical department and inform me of the issue. If you have any issues that would prevent you from getting your assignments to me by the deadline, please inform me to request a possible extension. Note that working fulltime or overtime is no excuse for late assignments. There is a 5%-point deduction for every day your assignment is late. This only applies to approved extensions. Late assignments will not be accepted.

If you think you would be needing accommodations due to any reasons, please contact the appropriate department to request accommodations.

Plagiarism is highly prohibited. Please ensure you are citing your sources correctly using APA 7th edition. All assignments including discussion posts should be formatted in APA with the appropriate spacing, font, margin, and indents. Any papers not well formatted would be returned back to you, hence, I advise you review APA formatting style. I have attached a sample paper in APA format and will also post sample discussion responses in subsequent announcements.

Your initial discussion post should be a minimum of 200 words and response posts should be a minimum of 150 words. Be advised that I grade based on quality and not necessarily the number of words you post. A minimum of TWO references should be used for your initial post. For your response post, you do not need references as personal experiences would count as response posts. If you however cite anything from the literature for your response post, it is required that you cite your reference. You should include a minimum of THREE references for papers in this course. Please note that references should be no more than 5 years old except recommended as a resource for the class. Furthermore, for each discussion board question, you need ONE initial substantive response and TWO substantive responses to either your classmates or your instructor for a total of THREE responses. There are TWO discussion questions each week, hence, you need a total minimum of SIX discussion posts for each week. I usually post a discussion question each week. You could also respond to these as it would count towards your required SIX discussion posts for the week.

I understand this is a lot of information to cover in 5 weeks, however, the Bible says in Philippians 4:13 that we can do all things through Christ that strengthens us. Even in times like this, we are encouraged by God’s word that we have that ability in us to succeed with His strength. I pray that each and every one of you receives strength for this course and life generally as we navigate through this pandemic that is shaking our world today. Relax and enjoy the course!

Hi Class,

Please read through the following information on writing a Discussion question response and participation posts.

Contact me if you have any questions.

Important information on Writing a Discussion Question

  • Your response needs to be a minimum of 150 words (not including your list of references)
  • There needs to be at least TWO references with ONE being a peer reviewed professional journal article.
  • Include in-text citations in your response
  • Do not include quotes—instead summarize and paraphrase the information
  • Follow APA-7th edition
  • Points will be deducted if the above is not followed

Participation –replies to your classmates or instructor

  • A minimum of 6 responses per week, on at least 3 days of the week.
  • Each response needs at least ONE reference with citations—best if it is a peer reviewed journal article
  • Each response needs to be at least 75 words in length (does not include your list of references)
  • Responses need to be substantive by bringing information to the discussion or further enhance the discussion. Responses of “I agree” or “great post” does not count for the word count.
  • Follow APA 7th edition
  • Points will be deducted if the above is not followed
  • Remember to use and follow APA-7th edition for all weekly assignments, discussion questions, and participation points.
  • Here are some helpful links
  • Student paper example
  • Citing Sources
  • The Writing Center is a great resource