Assignment 7.2: Discharge Data Case Study NUR 752

Value: 20 points

Introduction

Data analysis in today’s complex healthcare system affects the providers, payers, and vendors. The DNP leader must combine data management and analytics, patient safety, and quality to create a system where optimum care can occur. The DNP must be competent in data analytics to create information to inform practice decisions. This assignment provides an opportunity to hone those skills.

Scenario

Review the case study on pages 451–452 of your McBride textbook.

Assignment Guidelines

In a Word document, write one to two paragraphs that answer the following questions:

Which category of data should the analyst examine for this quality issue?
What are the pros and cons of a retrospective warehouse and a clinical data store to investigate the mortality rate? Which should the analyst use?
What type of analytic approach might the analyst use?
What type of tools might assist the analyst?

(McBride, 2018, pp. 451–452)

Assignment 7.2: Discharge Data Case Study NUR 752

Formatting and Mechanics

Use APA formatting.

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: Assignment 7.2: Discharge Data Case Study NUR 752

Submission

Submit your assignment and review full grading criteria on the Assignment 7.2: Discharge Data Case Study page

Select Grader

Week 7 Discharge Data Case Study Rubric

Week 7 Discharge Data Case Study Rubric
Criteria	Ratings	Pts
Introduction	5 to >4 pts Meets Expectations (>4 to 5 Points) Introduction to the paper is clear and concise and introduces the situation to the reader. 4 to >3 pts Nearly Meets Expectations (>3 to 4 Points) Introduction is brief and unfocused. 3 to >2 pts Barely Meets Expectations (>2 to 3 Points) Introduction is vague or disorganized. 2 to >0 pts Does Not Meet Expectations (0 to 2 Points) Introduction is confusing, lacks flow, and misleads reader.	5 / 5 pts
Data analytics	10 to >9 pts Meets Expectations (>9 to 10 Points) Answers show an understanding of material, and the answers are supported by strong evidence. Assigned readings and external source(s) are included. 9 to >8 pts Nearly Meets Expectations (>8 to 9 Points) Support is given for the answers to the questions and includes the assigned readings. 8 to >7 pts Barely Meets Expectations (>7 to 8 Points) Weak support is given for answers to questions or assigned readings are not included. 7 to >0 pts Does Not Meet Expectations (0 to 7 Points) Support lacking for answers to questions or assigned readings are not included.	10 / 10 pts
APA style	5 to >4 pts Meets Expectations (>4 to 5 Points) Writing is clear and concise. No errors are noted in grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation. 4 to >3 pts Nearly Meets Expectations (>3 to 4 Points) Writing is clear and concise. Few errors are noted in grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation. 3 to >2 pts Barely Meets Expectations (>2 to 3 Points) Writing is clear. Several errors are noted in grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation. 2 to >0 pts Does Not Meet Expectations (0 to 2 Points) Writing is unclear and/or rambling or brief. Numerous and distracting errors are noted in grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation. Comments Titles of periodicals in reference page should be in title case.	4.5 / 5 pts
APA format	0 pts Barely Meets Expectations (5% Deduction) Few errors are noted in APA format. 0 pts Does Not Meet Expectations (10% Deduction) Numerous and distracting errors are noted in grammar, spelling, punctuation and/or APA format. 0 pts Meets Expectations (No Deduction) No errors noted in APA format.	0 / 0 pts
Total Points: 19.5

Grading Rubric

Performance Category	100% or highest level of performance 100% 16 points	Very good or high level of performance 88% 14 points	Acceptable level of performance 81% 13 points	Inadequate demonstration of expectations 68% 11 points	Deficient level of performance 56% 9 points	Failing level of performance 55% or less 0 points
Total Points Possible= 50	16 Points	14 Points	13 Points	11 Points	9 Points	0 Points
Scholarliness Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic topics.	Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements: Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s). Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts. Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.* Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.	Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements: Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s). Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts. Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.* Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.	Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in all of the following elements: Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s). Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts. Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.* Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.	Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one of the following elements: Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s). Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts. Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.* Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.	Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements: Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s). Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts. Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.* Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.	Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three or more of the following elements Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s). Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts. Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.* Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information
	16 Points	14 Points	13 Points	11 Points	9 Points	0 Points
Application of Course Knowledge Demonstrate the ability to analyze and apply principles, knowledge and information learned in the outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations	Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements: Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic. Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience. Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.	Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements: Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic. Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience. Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.	Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements: Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic. Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience. Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.	Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one of the following elements: Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic. Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from and scholarly resources to a professional experience. Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.	Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements: Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic. Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience. Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.	Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three of the following elements Applies principles, knowledge and information and scholarly resources to the required topic. Applies facts, principles or concepts learned scholarly resources to a professional experience. Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
	10 Points	9 Points			6 Points	0 Points
Interactive Dialogue Initial post should be a minimum of 300 words (references do not count toward word count) The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each (references do not count toward word count) Responses are substantive and relate to the topic.	Demonstrated all of the following: Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words. The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each. Responses are substantive Responses are related to the topic of discussion.	Demonstrated 3 of the following: Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words. The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each. Responses are substantive Responses are related to the topic of discussion.			Demonstrated 2 of the following: Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words. The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each. Responses are substantive Responses are related to the topic of discussion.	Demonstrated 1 or less of the following: Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words. The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each. Responses are substantive Responses are related to the topic of discussion.
	8 Points	7 Points	6 Points	5 Points	4 Points	0 Points
Grammar, Syntax, APA Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing. The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition Error is defined to be a unique APA error. Same type of error is only counted as one error.	The following was present: 0-3 errors in APA format AND Responses have 0-3 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors AND Writing style is generally clear, focused on topic,and facilitates communication.	The following was present: 4-6 errors in APA format. AND/OR Responses have 4-5 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors AND/OR Writing style is somewhat focused on topic.	The following was present: 7-9 errors in APA format. AND/OR Responses have 6-7 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors AND/OR Writing style is slightly focused on topic making discussion difficult to understand.	The following was present: 10- 12 errors in APA format AND/OR Responses have 8-9 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors AND/OR Writing style is not focused on topic, making discussion difficult to understand.	The following was present: 13 – 15 errors in APA format AND/OR Responses have 8-10 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors AND/OR Writing style is not focused on topic, making discussion difficult to understand. AND/OR The student continues to make repeated mistakes in any of the above areas after written correction by the instructor.	The following was present: 16 to greater errors in APA format. AND/OR Responses have more than 10 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors. AND/OR Writing style does not facilitate communication
	0 Points Deducted					5 Points Lost
Participation Requirements	Demonstrated the following: Initial, peer, and faculty postings were made on 3 separate days					Failed to demonstrate the following: Initial, peer, and faculty postings were made on 3 separate days
	0 Points Lost					5 Points Lost
Due Date Requirements	Demonstrated all of the following: The initial posting to the graded threaded discussion topic is posted within the course no later than Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT. A minimum of one peer and one instructor responses are to be posted within the course no later than Sunday, 11:59 pm MT.					Demonstrates one or less of the following. The initial posting to the graded threaded discussion topic is posted within the course no later than Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT. A minimum of one peer and one instructor responses are to be posted within the course no later than Sunday, 11:59 pm MT.