Want create site? With Free visual composer you can do it easy.

NURS 6512  Assignment 1: Case Study Assessment Tools and Diagnostic Tests in Adults and Children

NURS 6512 Assignment 1: Case Study Assessment Tools and Diagnostic Tests in Adults and Children

When seeking to identify a patient’s health condition, advanced practice nurses can use
a diverse selection of diagnostic tests and assessment tools; however, different factors
affect the validity and reliability of the results produced by these tests or tools. Nurses
must be aware of these factors in order to select the most appropriate test or tool and to
accurately interpret the results.
Not only do these diagnostic tests affect adults, body measurements can provide a
general picture of whether a child is receiving adequate nutrition or is at risk for health
issues. These data, however, are just one aspect to be considered. Lifestyle, family
history, and culture—among other factors—are also relevant. That said, gathering and
communicating this information can be a delicate process.
Photo Credit: Getty Images/Hero Images
For this Assignment, you will consider the validity and reliability of different assessment
tools and diagnostic tests. You will explore issues such as sensitivity, specificity, and
positive and negative predictive values. You will also consider examples of children with
various weight issues. You will explore how you could effectively gather information and
encourage parents and caregivers to be proactive about their children’s health and
weight.
To Prepare
 Review this week’s Learning Resources and consider factors that impact the validity
and reliability of various assessment tools and diagnostic tests. You also will review
examples of pediatric patients and their families as it relates to BMI.
 By Day 1 of this week, you will be assigned to one of the following Assignment options
by your Instructor: Adult Assessment Tools or Diagnostic Tests (option 1), or Child
Health Case (Option 2). Note: Please see the “Course Announcements” section of the
classroom for your assignments from your Instructor.

NURSW 6512N 32 Assignment 1 Case Study Assessment Tools and Diagnostic Tests in Adults and Children

NURS 6512  Assignment 1 Case Study Assessment Tools and Diagnostic Tests in Adults and Children

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS:NURS 6512 Assignment 1: Case Study Assessment Tools and Diagnostic Tests in Adults and Children

 Search the Walden Library and credible sources for resources explaining the tool or test
you were assigned. What is its purpose, how is it conducted, and what information does
it gather?
 Also, as you search the Walden library and credible sources, consider what the
literature discusses regarding the validity, reliability, sensitivity, specificity, predictive
values, ethical dilemmas, and controversies related to the test or tool.
 If you are assigned Assignment Option 2 (Child), consider what health issues and risks
may be relevant to the child in the health example.
o Based on the risks you identified, consider what further information you would need to
gain a full understanding of the child’s health. Think about how you could gather this
information in a sensitive fashion.
o Consider how you could encourage parents or caregivers to be proactive toward the
child’s health.
The Assignment
Assignment (3–4 pages, not including title and reference pages):
Assignment Option 1: Adult Assessment Tools or Diagnostic Tests:
Include the following:
 A description of how the assessment tool or diagnostic test you were assigned is used
in healthcare.
o What is its purpose?
o How is it conducted?
o What information does it gather?
 Based on your research, evaluate the test or the tool’s validity and reliability, and
explain any issues with sensitivity, reliability, and predictive values. Include references
in appropriate APA formatting.
Assignment Option 2: Child Health Case:
Include the following:
 An explanation of the health issues and risks that are relevant to the child you were
assigned.
 Describe additional information you would need in order to further assess his or her
weight-related health.
 Identify and describe any risks and consider what further information you would need to
gain a full understanding of the child’s health. Think about how you could gather this
information in a sensitive fashion.
 Taking into account the parents’ and caregivers’ potential sensitivities, list at least three
specific questions you would ask about the child to gather more information.
 Provide at least two strategies you could employ to encourage the parents or caregivers
to be proactive about their child’s health and weight.
By Day 6 of Week 3
Submit your Assignment.
Submission and Grading Information
To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:
 Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK3Assgn1+last
name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
 Click the Week 3 Assignment 1 Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the
Assignment.

 Click the Week 3 Assignment 1 link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading
criteria from this area.
 Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the
document you saved as “WK3Assgn1+last name+first initial.(extension)” and
click Open.
 If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit
my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
 Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.
Grading Criteria
To access your rubric:
Week 3 Assignment 1 Option 1 Rubric
To access your rubric:
Week 3 Assignment 1 Option 2 Rubric
To check your Assignment draft for authenticity:
Submit your Week 3 Assignment 1 draft and review the originality report.
Submit Your Assignment by Day 6 of Week 3
To participate in this Assignment:
Week 3 Assignment 1

Name:  Assignment Rubric

  Excellent Good Fair Poor
Summarize your interpretation of the frequency data provided in the output for respondent’s age, highest school grade completed, and family income from prior month. 32 (32%) – 35 (35%)

The response accurately and clearly explains, in detail, a summary of the frequency distributions for the variables presented.

The response accurately and clearly explains, in detail, the number of times the value occurs in the data.

The response accurately and clearly explains, in detail, the appearance of the data, the range of data values, and an explanation of extreme values in describing intervals that sufficiently provides an analysis that fully supports the categorization of each variable value.

The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the explanations provided for each of the areas described.

28 (28%) – 31 (31%)

The response accurately summarizes the frequency distributions for the variables presented.

The response accurately explains the number of times the value occurs in the data.

The response accurately explains the appearance of the data, the range of data values, and explains extreme values in describing intervals that provides an analysis which supports the categorization of each variable value.

The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the explanations provided for each of the areas described.

25 (25%) – 27 (27%)

The response inaccurately or vaguely summarizes the frequency distributions for the variables presented.

The response inaccurately or vaguely explains the number of times the value occurs in the data.

The response inaccurately or vaguely explains the appearance of the data, the range of data values, and inaccurately or vaguely explains extreme values.

An analysis that may support the categorization of each variable value is inaccurate or vague.

The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the explanations provided for each of the areas described.

0 (0%) – 24 (24%)

The response inaccurately and vaguely summarizes the frequency distributions for the variables presented, or it is missing.

The response inaccurately and vaguely explains the number of times the value occurs in the data, or it is missing.

The response inaccurately and vaguely explains the appearance of the data, the range of data values, and an explanation of extreme values, or it is missing.

An analysis that does not support the categorization of each variable values is provided, or it is missing.

The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the explanations provided for each of the areas described, or it is missing.

Summarize your interpretation of the descriptive statistics provided in the output for respondent’s age, highest school grade completed, race and ethnicity, currently employed, and family income from prior month. 45 (45%) – 50 (50%)

The response accurately and clearly summarizes in detail the interpretation of the descriptive statistics provided.

The response accurately and clearly evaluates in detail each of the variables presented, including an accurate and complete description of the sample size, the mean, the median, standard deviation, and the size and spread of the data.

40 (40%) – 44 (44%)

The response accurately summarizes the interpretation of the descriptive statistics provided.

The response accurately explains evaluates each of the variables presented, including an accurate description of the sample size, the mean, the median, standard deviation, and the size and spread of the data.

35 (35%) – 39 (39%)

The response inaccurately or vaguely summarizes the interpretation of the descriptive statistics provided.

The response inaccurately or vaguely evaluates each of the variables presented, including an inaccurate or vague description of the sample size, the mean, the median, the standard deviation, and the size and spread of the data.

0 (0%) – 34 (34%)

The response inaccurately and vaguely summarizes the interpretation of the descriptive statistics provided, or it is missing.

The response inaccurately and vaguely evaluates each of the variables presented, including an inaccurate and vague description of the sample size, the mean, the median, the standard deviation, and the size and spread of the data, or it is missing.

Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization:
Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria.
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.

A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.

4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.

Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.

3 (3%) – 3 (3%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time.

Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.

0 (0%) – 2 (2%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time.

No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided.

Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards:
Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3 (3%) – 3 (3%)

Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

0 (0%) – 2 (2%)

Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Uses correct APA format with no errors.

4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.

3 (3%) – 3 (3%)

Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.

0 (0%) – 2 (2%)

Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.

Total Points: 100

Name:  Assignment Rubric

Did you find apk for android? You can find new Free Android Games and apps.