APU Methods of Creating Individualized Diets for Athletes Questions

APU Methods of Creating Individualized Diets for Athletes Questions

Sample Answer for APU Methods of Creating Individualized Diets for Athletes Questions Included After Question

Description

This is a forum that have 3 different individual question. Question aren’t related to each other, so please answer each one separately ( 150 words minimum pero question)

Forum A:
Topic One: “Make food your medicine!”  Okay, did I get your attention?  This quote is attributed to Hippocrates and it is getting people’s attention. Grabbing the attention of your reader is critical to engage them in your research.  The first one or two sentences should hook them in, introduce your topic and help your reader decide whether they want to continue reading your paper.

For this forum, draft two hook examples for the research paper you are writing on the class’s research project. Discuss how the hooks draw readers in, create interest in the study and are presented at a level to which readers can relate.

APU Methods of Creating Individualized Diets for Athletes Questions
APU Methods of Creating Individualized Diets for Athletes Questions

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS:APU Methods of Creating Individualized Diets for Athletes Questions

Forum B:

  1. State your Problem Statement
  2. List your chosen hypothesis.
    It should be based on the hypothesis you worked on in forum 3c.  And this chosen hypothesis should be detailed and testable (an edited version of your initial hypothesis suggestions based on my and your classmate’s feedback.  This hypothesis narrows your study toward the research questions you want to ask. The hypothesis is based on the topic we chose as a class but is now specific to your area of interest within the topic.  (*If I see a major issue with your hypothesis, I will ask you to adjust it, if I don’t say anything about it proceed as you have it written.)
  3. List 2-4 survey questions that will go into your data collection survey.
    Your survey questions will be asked in your very own survey monkey survey.  (Looking ahead: You will use these questions, once refined, and any other questions you find that fit your narrowed study and your specific hypothesis in your survey monkey you send to your population sample.)

Forum C:

John McEnroe is known for his numerous angry outbursts on the tennis court. Is anger and violence in sports a critical part of competing?  What about the fans who display rage and violence? Should this be curtailed?

Reading the scientific, peer-reviewed research can be confusing and requires practice, so you are going to practice finding, interpreting and reporting on articles in the next few weeks.

This week’s topic is anger and violence in sports.  Emotions play a significant role in games for both the athlete and the spectator.  This week’s forum discussion will focus on the feelings, anger, and violence, either the athlete and/or the spectator.

You are to look for a scientific, peer-reviewed research article.  The best place is the library or PubMed. Do not report on a peer-reviewed review paper on the topic.  A review paper summarizes several original research papers.  You can use a review to help you find a scientific study.  Also, a research study paper usually has the following sections: abstract, introduction, methods, results, conclusions, figures and tables. A review paper does not have these sections.

A Sample Answer For the Assignment: APU Methods of Creating Individualized Diets for Athletes Questions

Title:  APU Methods of Creating Individualized Diets for Athletes Questions

  Excellent Good Fair Poor
Main Postinga 45 (45%) – 50 (50%)

Answers all parts of the discussion question(s) expectations with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.

 

Supported by at least three current, credible sources.

 

Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

40 (40%) – 44 (44%)

Responds to the discussion question(s) and is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

 

At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth.

 

Supported by at least three credible sources.

 

Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

35 (35%) – 39 (39%)

Responds to some of the discussion question(s).

 

One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed.

 

Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.

 

Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

 

Post is cited with two credible sources.

 

Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors.

 

Contains some APA formatting errors.

0 (0%) – 34 (34%)

Does not respond to the discussion question(s) adequately.

 

Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria.

 

Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.

 

Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

 

Contains only one or no credible sources.

 

Not written clearly or concisely.

 

Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors.

 

Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style.

Main Post: Timeliness 10 (10%) – 10 (10%)

Posts main post by day 3.

0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

Does not post by day 3.

First Response 17 (17%) – 18 (18%)

Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.

 

Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.

 

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.

 

Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.

 

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

 

Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.

 

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

15 (15%) – 16 (16%)

Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.

 

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

 

Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.

 

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.

 

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

13 (13%) – 14 (14%)

Response is on topic and may have some depth.

 

Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.

 

Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.

 

Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.

0 (0%) – 12 (12%)

Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.

 

Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.

 

Responses to faculty questions are missing.

 

No credible sources are cited.

Second Response 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)

Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.

 

Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.

 

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.

 

Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.

 

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

 

Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.

 

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

14 (14%) – 15 (15%)

Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.

 

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

 

Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.

 

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.

 

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

12 (12%) – 13 (13%)

Response is on topic and may have some depth.

 

Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.

 

Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.

 

Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.

0 (0%) – 11 (11%)

Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.

 

Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.

 

Responses to faculty questions are missing.

 

No credible sources are cited.

Participation 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Meets requirements for participation by posting on three different days.

0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

Does not meet requirements for participation by posting on 3 different days.

Total Points: 100