HQS 620 Topic 3 Project Charter Template
Sample Answer for HQS 620 Topic 3 Project Charter Template Included After Question
HQS 620 Topic 3 Project Charter Template
Project Charter Template
Part 1: A project charter is an essential element in the design phase of project management. The project charter serves as a framework and outlines key details of the project. Ultimately, the project charter will give authority to the project manager once key stakeholders and leadership sign off. Complete the template below based on the running case study in the Class Resources.
| Project Title: | |||
| Project Start Date: Projected Finish Date: | |||
| Project Manager: (include name and e-mail)
|
|||
| Background/Need/Justification:
|
|||
| Project Objective(s):
|
|||
| Applicable Industry Standards:
|
|||
| Budget Information:
|
|||
| Deliverables:
|
|||
| Risks and/or Potential Issues:
|
|||
| Project Timeline: | |||
| Key milestones | Team Member Responsible | Planned Target Date | Actual Date |
| Project Team: Roles and Responsibilities: | |||
| Position | Position | Position | Position |
| Approval/Review Committee: | |||
| Name and Signature | Role | Position | Contact Information |
Part 2: In 500-750 words, address the following:
- Summarize the steps involved in initiating and designing a project in a health care setting.
- Describe the influence of authority gradients on team selection and formulation. What is unique about this relative to health care quality and safety?
- Explain how authority gradients influence team work and patient safety in a health care setting.
- Research and describe two strategies for identifying and managing overlap in team member roles and accountabilities in a health care setting.
- Describe one benefit and one challenge for each researched strategy.
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: HQS 620 Topic 3 Project Charter Template
HQS 620 Topic 3 Project Charter Template References
This assignment requires one or two scholarly resources. Cite these references below.
Assessment Description
The purpose of this assignment is to create a project charter with a work breakdown structure. Select one case study in Chapter 8 of the textbook from the following options: Case Study: Nurse Manager or Case Study: Informatics Nurse Specialist (INS). The case study you select in this topic will be used throughout the course to complete the assignments in Topics 3-7.
Review Figure 3.2 “Project Charter Content” from Chapter 3 in the textbook. Use this as a model to complete the “Project Charter Template” located in the topic Resources folder. You will complete the template as if you are the project manager. The project charter will serve as a statement of work for the case study you selected in Chapter 8 of the textbook.
This assignment requires one or two scholarly resources.
Prepare Part 2 of the template according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.
Attachments
HQS-620-RS-ProjectCharterTemplate.doc
Resources
Collapse All
How to Write the Project Statement of Work (SOW)
Read “How to Write the Project Statement of Work (SOW),” located on the Project Management Website (2018).
Project Management for the Advanced Practice Nurse
Read Chapter 3 in Project Management for the Advanced Practice Nurse.
View Resource
Project Design Template: A 9-Step Approach to Designing a Project
Read “Project Design Template: A 9-Step Approach to Designing a Project,” from My Management Guide.
https://mymanagementguide.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/project-design-template-download.pdf
Mapping a Start for Quality Improvement
Read “Mapping a Start for Quality Improvement,” by Harris, from Physician Leadership Journal (2018).
https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=130201825&site=eds-live&scope=site
The Four Phases of Project Management
Read “The Four Phases of Project Management,” by Harvard Business Review Staff (2016), located on the Harvard Busine
… Read More
Project Charter Template – Rubric
Collapse All
Project Charter Template
25 points
Criteria Description
Project Charter Template
- 5: Excellent
25 points
The Project Charter Template is present and includes substantial relevant details.
- 4: Good
23 points
The Project Charter Template is present and includes relevant details.
- 3: Satisfactory
22 points
The Project Charter Template is present.
- 2: Less Than Satisfactory
20 points
The Project Charter Template is complete but lacks detail or is incomplete.
- 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
The Project Charter Template is not complete or is incorrect.
Summary
9 points
Criteria Description
Summary
- 5: Excellent
9 points
A summary of the steps involved in initiating and designing a project is present and thorough.
- 4: Good
8.28 points
A summary of the steps involved in initiating and designing a project is present and detailed.
- 3: Satisfactory
7.92 points
A summary of the steps involved in initiating and designing a project is present.
- 2: Less Than Satisfactory
7.2 points
A summary of the steps involved in initiating and designing a project is present but lacks detail or is incomplete.
- 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
A summary of the steps involved in initiating and designing a project is not present or is inappropriate.
Influence of Authority Gradients on Team Selection and Formulation
9 points
Criteria Description
Influence of Authority Gradients on Team Selection and Formulation
- 5: Excellent
9 points
An explanation of the influence of authority gradients on team selection and formulation is present and thorough.
- 4: Good
8.28 points
An explanation of the influence of authority gradients on team selection and formulation is present and detailed.
- 3: Satisfactory
7.92 points
An explanation of the influence of authority gradients on team selection and formulation is present.
- 2: Less Than Satisfactory
7.2 points
An explanation of the influence of authority gradients on team selection and formulation is present but lacks detail or is incomplete.
- 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
An explanation of the influence of authority gradients on team selection and formulation is not present.
Influence of Authority Gradients on Teamwork and Patient Safety
9 points
Criteria Description
Influence of Authority Gradients on Teamwork and Patient Safety
- 5: Excellent
9 points
An explanation of how authority gradients influence teamwork and patient safety is present and thorough.
- 4: Good
8.28 points
An explanation of how authority gradients influence teamwork and patient safety is present and detailed.
- 3: Satisfactory
7.92 points
An explanation of how authority gradients influence teamwork and patient safety is present.
- 2: Less Than Satisfactory
7.2 points
An explanation of how authority gradients influence teamwork and patient safety is present but lacks detail or is incomplete.
- 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
An explanation of how authority gradients influence teamwork and patient safety is not present.
Identifying and Managing Overlap
9 points
Criteria Description
Identifying and Managing Overlap
- 5: Excellent
9 points
A description of two strategies for identifying and managing overlap in team member roles and accountabilities is present and thorough.
- 4: Good
8.28 points
A description of two strategies for identifying and managing overlap in team member roles and accountabilities is present and detailed.
- 3: Satisfactory
7.92 points
A description of two strategies for identifying and managing overlap in team member roles and accountabilities is present.
- 2: Less Than Satisfactory
7.2 points
A description of two strategies for identifying and managing overlap in team member roles and accountabilities is present but lacks detail or is incomplete.
- 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
A description of two strategies for identifying and managing overlap in team member roles and accountabilities is not present.
Benefits and Challenges of Strategies
9 points
Criteria Description
Benefits and Challenges of Strategies
- 5: Excellent
9 points
One benefit and one challenge for each researched strategy is present and thorough.
- 4: Good
8.28 points
One benefit and one challenge for each researched strategy is present and detailed.
- 3: Satisfactory
7.92 points
One benefit and one challenge for each researched strategy is present.
- 2: Less Than Satisfactory
7.2 points
One benefit and one challenge for each researched strategy is present but lacks detail or is incomplete.
- 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
One benefit and one challenge for each researched strategy is not present or is incomplete.
Thesis Development and Purpose
7 points
Criteria Description
Thesis Development and Purpose
- 5: Excellent
7 points
Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
- 4: Good
6.44 points
Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.
- 3: Satisfactory
6.16 points
Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.
- 2: Less Than Satisfactory
5.6 points
Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.
- 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
Argument Logic and Construction
8 points
Criteria Description
Argument Logic and Construction
- 5: Excellent
8 points
Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
- 4: Good
7.36 points
Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.
- 3: Satisfactory
7.04 points
Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.
- 2: Less Than Satisfactory
6.4 points
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.
- 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
5 points
Criteria Description
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
- 5: Excellent
5 points
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
- 4: Good
4.6 points
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.
- 3: Satisfactory
4.4 points
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.
- 2: Less Than Satisfactory
4 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.
- 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.
Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)
5 points
Criteria Description
Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)
- 5: Excellent
5 points
All format elements are correct.
- 4: Good
4.6 points
Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.
- 3: Satisfactory
4.4 points
Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.
- 2: Less Than Satisfactory
4 points
Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.
- 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.
Documentation of Sources
5 points
Criteria Description
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)
- 5: Excellent
5 points
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
- 4: Good
4.6 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.
- 3: Satisfactory
4.4 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.
- 2: Less Than Satisfactory
4 points
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.
- 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Sources are not documented.