NURS 6052 Evidence-Based Project, Part 1 Identifying Research Methodologies

NURS 6052 Evidence-Based Project, Part 1 Identifying Research Methodologies

Sample Answer for NURS 6052 Evidence-Based Project, Part 1 Identifying Research Methodologies Included After Question

Is there a difference between “common practice” and “best practice”?

When you first went to work for your current organization, experienced colleagues may have shared with you details about processes and procedures. Perhaps you even attended an orientation session to brief you on these matters. As a “rookie,” you likely kept the nature of your questions to those with answers that would best help you perform your new role.

Over time and with experience, perhaps you recognized aspects of these processes and procedures that you wanted to question further. This is the realm of clinical inquiry.

Clinical inquiry is the practice of asking questions about clinical practice. To continuously improve patient care, all nurses should consistently use clinical inquiry to question why they are doing something the way they are doing it. Do they know why it is done this way, or is it just because we have always done it this way? Is it a common practice or a best practice?

In this Assignment, you will identify clinical areas of interest and inquiry and practice searching for research in support of maintaining or changing these practices. You will also analyze this research to compare research methodologies employed.

To Prepare:

  • Review the Resources and identify a clinical issue of interest that can form the basis of a clinical inquiry. Keep in mind that the clinical issue you identify for your research will stay the same for the entire course.
  • Based on the clinical issue of interest and using keywords related to the clinical issue of interest, search at least four different databases in the Walden Library to identify at least four relevant peer-reviewed articles related to your clinical issue of interest. You should not be using systematic reviews for this assignment, select original research articles.
  • Review the results of your peer-reviewed research and reflect on the process of using an unfiltered database to search for peer-reviewed research.
  • Reflect on the types of research methodologies contained in the four relevant peer-reviewed articles you selected.

Part 1: Identifying Research Methodologies

After reading each of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected, use the Matrix Worksheet template to analyze the methodologies applied in each of the four peer-reviewed articles. Your analysis should include the following:

  • The full citation of each peer-reviewed article in APA format.
  • A brief (1-paragraph) statement explaining why you chose this peer-reviewed article and/or how it relates to your clinical issue of interest, including a brief explanation of the ethics of research related to your clinical issue of interest.
  • A brief (1-2 paragraph) description of the aims of the research of each peer-reviewed article.
  • A brief (1-2 paragraph) description of the research methodology used. Be sure to identify if the methodology used was qualitative, quantitative, or a mixed-methods approach. Be specific.
  • A brief (1- to 2-paragraph) description of the strengths of each of the research methodologies used, including reliability and validity of how the methodology was applied in each of the peer-reviewed articles you selected.

By Day 7 of Week 3

Submit your Evidence-Based Project.

Submission and Grading Information

To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:

  • Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK3Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
  • Click the Week 3 Assignment Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
  • Click the Week 3 Assignment link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
  • Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK3Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.
  • If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
  • Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.
  • Due to the nature of this assignment, your instructor may require more than 5 days to provide you with quality feedback.

A Sample Answer For the Assignment: NURS 6052 Evidence-Based Project, Part 1 Identifying Research Methodologies

Title: NURS 6052 Evidence-Based Project, Part 1 Identifying Research Methodologies

Mental health disorders such as depression have immense impact on the affected populations and their significant others. Depression lowers the patient’s quality of life, as evidenced by the increased care needs, loss of productivity, and premature mortality. Nurses and other healthcare providers are increasingly involved in the implementation of evidence-based interventions to minimize burden due to depression in their populations. An example is exploring the effectiveness of technology incorporation into the treatments adopted for patients with major depression. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to explore the effectiveness of telehealth interventions in improving the treatment outcomes in depression.

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NURS 6052 Evidence-Based Project, Part 1 Identifying Research Methodologies

NURS 6052 Evidence-Based Project, Part 1 Identifying Research Methodologies
NURS 6052 Evidence-Based Project, Part 1 Identifying Research Methodologies
Full citation of selected article Article #1 Article #2 Article #3 Article #4
References

Bellanti, D. M., Kelber, M. S., Workman, D. E., Beech, E. H., & Belsher, B. E. (2022). Rapid Review on the Effectiveness of Telehealth Interventions for the Treatment of Behavioral Health Disorders. Military Medicine, 187(5–6), e577–e588. https://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/usab318

 

 

 Egede, L. E., Dismuke, C. E., Walker, R. J., Acierno, R., & Frueh, B. C. (2018). Cost-Effectiveness of Behavioral Activation for Depression in Older Adult Veterans: In-Person Care Versus Telehealth. The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 79(5), 3853. https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.17m11888 Scott, A. M., Clark, J., Greenwood, H., Krzyzaniak, N., Cardona, M., Peiris, R., Sims, R., & Glasziou, P. (2022). Telehealth v. face-to-face provision of care to patients with depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological Medicine, 52(14), 2852–2860. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291722002331 Zhao, L., Chen, J., Lan, L., Deng, N., Liao, Y., Yue, L., Chen, I., Wen, S. W., & Xie, R. (2021). Effectiveness of Telehealth Interventions for Women With Postpartum Depression: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JMIR MHealth and UHealth, 9(10), e32544. https://doi.org/10.2196/32544
Why you chose this article and/or how it relates to the clinical issue of interest (include a brief explanation of the ethics of research related to your clinical issue of interest) I chose this article because it examines the effectiveness of telehealth interventions for treating behavioral health disorders. The research shows that the use of telehealth in behavioral problems such as depression is comparable to face-to-face provision of psychiatry and psychotherapy services. The ethics of research related to my clinical issue of interest includes ensuring informed consent, privacy, and confidentiality when using telehealth interventions.

 

 

 I chose this study because it supports the use of telehealth in mental health problems that include depression. The research shows that telehealth interventions are cost-effective as compared to face-to-face delivery of treatment interventions. The ethics of research that relate to my clinical issue of interest include safety, quality, efficiency, and patient empowerment. I chose this article because it demonstrates the effectiveness of telehealth among patients with depression as compared to face-to-face. The article demonstrates the feasibility of telehealth interventions alongside their applicability to addressing the needs of patients suffering from depression. The research ethics that will inform my clinical issue of interest include beneficence, informed consent, and patient autonomy. I chose this study because it explores the effectiveness of telehealth in improving depressive and anxiety symptoms among patients with post-partum depression. The study informs the relevance of telehealth use in the delivery of virtual care for patients suffering from mental health disorders. The issue of ethics that relates to my clinical issue is informed consent and data privacy and confidentiality.
Brief description of the aims of the research of each peer-reviewed article The aim of this research was to investigate the effectiveness of behavioral health treatments delivered in person as compared to telehealth through telephone and teleconference. The aim of this study was to examine whether the delivery of behavioral activation for depression through telehealth was cost-effective as compared to in-person care. The aim of this study was to compare the real-time to face-to-face therapy for patients suffering from depression. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of telehealth interventions in reducing anxiety and depressive symptoms in women with post-partum depression.
Brief description of the research methodology used Be sure to identify if the methodology used was qualitative, quantitative, or a mixed-methods approach. Be specific. This study was quantitative research. The researchers searched relevant articles on PubMed database where hand-searching of relevant systematic review, dual screening, dual of risk bias assessment, and data abstraction were done.

 

 

 

 

 The research was quantitative. It was a randomized, non-inferior trial that involved assigning participants to 1 of 2 arms of 8-week behavioral activation therapy either through telehealth or in-person. The study was quantitative. It was a systematic review that utilized evidence from articles that were obtained from databases that included Cochrane Central, Embase, and Medline. The included studies were mainly randomized controlled trials that compared the use of telehealth vs face-to-face for patients with major depression. The study was quantitative. It was a systematic review and meta-analysis of evidence from articles that were obtained from databases that included CINAHL, Cochrane library, PsycINFO, CNKI, and Wanfang.
A brief description of the strengths of each of the research methodologies used, including reliability and validity of how the methodology was applied in each of the peer-reviewed articles you selected. One of the strengths of this study is that it compares the effectiveness of telehealth interventions with the traditional face-to-face interaction in the delivery of behavioral interventions. It also reviewed best-available evidence on the topic to come up with conclusive evidence. The reliability and validity of findings were maintained by having a third researcher independently assessing the relevance, appropriateness, and need for the selected articles and data abstraction.

 

 The strength of this research is that it randomized participants into either control or intervention groups to determine the true effect of the interventions. The randomization also enhanced the validity and reliability of the research. The other strength is the use of a large sample size, which strengthened the generalizability of findings. One of the strengths of this study is that it reviewed evidence obtained from randomized controlled trials to come up with conclusive evidence on the effectiveness of telehealth as compared to face-to-face interventions in depression. The other strength is the inclusion of studies that used a high number of participants, which enhanced the generalizability of outcomes. The authors achieved reliability by using a large sample size. They ensured validity by selecting studies that related to the topic and using independent researchers in searching and extracting data from the selected articles. The study is associated with the strength of utilizing randomized controlled trials for the systematic review and meta-analysis. It also used a large sample size to ensure reliability and validity of findings. The selected studies were reviewed for potential bias, to ensure the obtained results had a high reliability rate.
General Notes/Comments This article informs the need for telehealth in the delivery of behavioral interventions for patients with mental health problems.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 This research demonstrates that the use of telehealth is cost-effective as compared to the use of in-person interventions. This article shows the effectiveness of telehealth interventions in improving treatment outcomes among patients with depression. This study supports the use of telehealth interventions to improve outcomes among patients suffering from depression.

Conclusion

In summary, the reviewed data shows that telehealth interventions are effective in improving outcomes among patients suffering from depression. The studies show that telehealth interventions may be used to complement the use of face-to-face interventions. The results also show that telehealth reduce the costs associated with depression treatment. Therefore, its use should be explored in my practice site.

References

Bellanti, D. M., Kelber, M. S., Workman, D. E., Beech, E. H., & Belsher, B. E. (2022). Rapid Review on the Effectiveness of Telehealth Interventions for the Treatment of Behavioral Health Disorders. Military Medicine, 187(5–6), e577–e588. https://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/usab318

Egede, L. E., Dismuke, C. E., Walker, R. J., Acierno, R., & Frueh, B. C. (2018). Cost-Effectiveness of Behavioral Activation for Depression in Older Adult Veterans: In-Person Care Versus Telehealth. The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 79(5), 3853. https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.17m11888

Scott, A. M., Clark, J., Greenwood, H., Krzyzaniak, N., Cardona, M., Peiris, R., Sims, R., & Glasziou, P. (2022). Telehealth v. face-to-face provision of care to patients with depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological Medicine, 52(14), 2852–2860. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291722002331

Zhao, L., Chen, J., Lan, L., Deng, N., Liao, Y., Yue, L., Chen, I., Wen, S. W., & Xie, R. (2021). Effectiveness of Telehealth Interventions for Women With Postpartum Depression: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JMIR MHealth and UHealth, 9(10), e32544. https://doi.org/10.2196/32544

A Sample Answer 3 For the Assignment: NURS 6052 Evidence-Based Project, Part 1 Identifying Research Methodologies

Title: NURS 6052 Evidence-Based Project, Part 1 Identifying Research Methodologies

Part 2: Research Methodologies

Full citation of selected article Article #1 Article #2 Article #3 Article #4
 

Alikhani, R., Salimi, A., Hormati, A., & Aminnejad, R. (2020). Mental health advice for frontline healthcare providers caring for patients with COVID-19. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, 67(8), 1068-1069.

 

 

 

 Billings, J., Abou Seif, N., Hegarty, S., Ondruskova, T., Soulios, E., Bloomfield, M., & Greene, T. (2021). What support do frontline workers want? A qualitative study of health and social care workers’ experiences and views of psychosocial support during the COVID-19 pandemic. PloS one, 16(9), e0256454.

 

 Chersich, M. F., Gray, G., Fairlie, L., Eichbaum, Q., Mayhew, S., Allwood, B., … & Rees, H. (2020). COVID-19 in Africa: care and protection for frontline healthcare workers. Globalization and health, 16, 1-6.

 

 Nguyen, L. H., Drew, D. A., Joshi, A. D., Guo, C. G., Ma, W., Mehta, R. S., … & COPE Consortium. (2020). Risk of COVID-19 among frontline healthcare workers. MedRxiv.

 
Why you chose this article and/or how it relates to the clinical issue of interest (include a brief explanation of the ethics of research related to your clinical issue of interest)  

The healthcare teams have always been at the frontline of the battle against the coronavirus pandemic since it was reported as a global concern. The emphasis of standardized criteria has been on keeping these teams safe from infections and bodily injury. There is considerably less information to help Alikhani et al. (2020) safeguard their teams’ mental health. Operating under duress in a high-stress job is exhausting even when things are going well. I choose to review this article because patients and their healthcare professionals will benefit from interventions that reduce tiredness, burnout, especially medical errors. All healthcare personnel must collaborate for a better change.

 

 

 I chose to incorporate this article since the importance of assisting frontline workers’ mental health has recently been recognized within the article. Unfortunately, there has been little study on effectively serving frontline professionals’ psychosocial needs—neither one according to their own experiences and perspectives on what may be most appropriate.

 

 I chose to utilize this source because, while the medical personnel care for their COVID-19 patients, they experience emotional and physical fatigue, isolation from their families, stigma, and the grief of losing patients or their coworkers. The virus has infected many of them, and several have died as a result. There are severe deficiencies in response capability in Africa, where the disease is spreading, particularly human resources and personal protective gear.

Due to global competition, Africa’s supply of protective gear is restricted (Chersich et al., 2020). Low-cost treatments like facemasks for coughing patients and proper handwashing equipment, as well as ‘physical distance’ in packed public healthcare facilities, might be difficult. COVID-19 deaths among healthcare workers in Africa can be significant if sufficient protection is not provided due to a lack of critical care units and problems transferring ill healthcare practitioners from villages to city treatment centers.

 

 Over 40 million occurrences of COVID-19 have already been recorded worldwide as of 2020, with nearly 270,000 fatalities (Nguyen et al., 2020). The prevalence of this illness was anticipated to grow within the initial weeks due to continuous community infection from asymptomatic persons. The constant use of prescribed PPE is important to minimizing infection based on experience with other infections transmitted by respiratory secretions.

 
Brief description of the aims of the research of each peer-reviewed article According to Alikhani et al. (2020), research under this topic would establish countrywide psychological support hotlines to aid healthcare practitioners during the pandemic. Evidence-based assessments and mental health therapies aimed at frontline medical practitioners, on the other hand, are in short supply (Alikhani et al., 2020). The goal of this research was to examine psychological wellbeing across health care professionals treating COVID-19 victims by assessing the severity of depression, anxiety, sleeplessness, and discomfort symptoms and identifying possible risk factors linked with some of these symptoms.

 

 The sole goal of this research was to research the most effective intervention for health care workers (Billings et al., 2021). They set out to fill this study gap by systematically investigating the experiences and perspectives of UK frontline social and health care professionals on psychological assistance throughout the epidemic.

 

 In an epidemic, African healthcare professional confront significant obstacles, and this was the main research aim. Chersich et al. (2020) offer ten high-priority actions in Africa to protect frontline health professionals. The epidemic in Africa, and its long-term effects on social security, economic prosperity, and safety, will be shaped by how successfully we preserve their physical and mental health as there are several objectives for the COVID-19 action on the region, Chersich et al. (2020) strongly encourage WHO, federal governments, the corporate sector, and also the general public to focus on health – care workers protection and psychological wellbeing.

 

 

 Since data regarding frontline health professionals and risk of covid 19 infections are sparse and whether protective equipment lessens this hazard is uncertain. Nguyen et al. (2020) looked at the danger of COVID-19 among active Healthcare staff versus the general public and the impact of personal protective equipment. Healthcare practitioners on the front lines exhibited a considerably higher risk of infection. The risk was greatest among those who reused their gear or had insufficient access to protective protection equipment. Appropriate protective equipment supplies, on the other hand, did not entirely prevent high-risk exposures.

 
Brief description of the research methodology used Be sure to identify if the methodology used was qualitative, quantitative, or a mixed-methods approach. Be specific.  

 

This study utilized a qualitative research method of data collection. Alikhani et al. (2020) seem to be more interested in qualitative research’s validity, applicability, and dependability than consistency. They engaged several researchers in the data collecting, coding, and analysis procedures to enhance the validity of their findings by questioning their preconceptions and uncovering potential ‘weak points’ that they could have had with relation to this issue. First, before the trial began, the Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University’s clinical research and ethics committee gave its approval. Before being enrolled in the survey, every participant gave verbally informed permission.

 

 

 

 

 The research employed the mixed method of data collection under its methodology. Frontline social and health care employees were purposefully recruited using social platforms and non – random sampling among healthcare colleagues. Participants who agreed to participate in the research were interviewed using a semi-structured interview protocol over the phone (Billings et al., 2021). The study team used the techniques of Reflexive Thematic Analysis to analyze the interview transcripts.

 

 Here, a qualitative approach of data collection method was utilized. Studies were selected to provide data and analysis on the dangers of infection and psychological health that healthcare professionals experienced during the pandemic. Research also took place in a variety of settings (Chersich et al., 2020). Publications about the COVID-19 epidemic in Africa, in general, were also incorporated. Publications on infection prevention and control or psychological health in the pandemic were equally essential; therefore, they were included in this study.

 

 Here, to conduct this research, quantitative research methods were used. This large prospective study was also conducted through using COVID 19 Symptom Research software, a smartphone app developed by Zoe Global Company limited in partnership with Massachusetts General Hospital as well as King’s College in London that provides participants with a directed interface to reveal a variety of benchmark demographic and comorbidity information, along with everyday information on prospective symptoms.

 
A brief description of the strengths of each of the research methodologies used, including reliability and validity of how the methodology was applied in each of the peer-reviewed articles you selected.  

The strength of the qualitative research methodology employed has many implications. This qualitative research included reflexivity, which allows readers to assess the validity of the findings by learning more about the research team that created them (Alikhani et al., 2020). This team is comprised of a varied collection of researchers from various career phases, clinical specialties, genders, and a variety of backgrounds. Therefore, the ethical standards in the research methodology were upheld to the latter.

 

 According to the findings of this research, frontline social and health care professionals are likely to require a flexible social support system that includes peer, organizational, and professional assistance. Therefore, this demonstrates that the research methodology was adhered to and the most appropriate data was collected. More study is needed to completely understand the structural, institutional, and individual obstacles to receiving psychological help (Billings et al., 2021). It is necessary to increase collaboration, engagement, and co-production of support programs and their assessment.

 

 One of the important strengths of the research methodology in this article is that appropriate measures inside health institutions can reduce the risk of infection among healthcare workers. This mostly entails using safety equipment, such as gowns, gloves, masks, and eyewear. Careful wearing and personal protective equipment are still crucial defenses, but they need extensive training and supervision.

 

 The app was released in the United Kingdom in March 2020 and then in the United States in March 2020 (Nguyen et al., 2020). Participants were found through social media network outreach and invite to study volunteers from the researchers of long-running prospective studies. Participants gave informed permission to use aggregated data for research purposes and approved the privacy policy and use requirements at the time of enrolment (Nguyen et al., 2020). The London Ethics Committee approved this observational study.

 
General Notes/Comments There is considerably less information to help Alikhani et al. (2020) safeguard their teams’ mental health.

 

 

 

 

 In this article, the COVID-19 virus has had a major impact on frontline social and health care professionals’ psychological health and overall wellbeing. Authors in this article encountered these issues and made recommendations on how to protect health professionals from emotional and physical fatigue, isolation from their families, stigma, and the grief of losing patients or their coworkers. Because there is limited data on frontline health personnel and COVID 19 infections, it is unclear if protective equipment can reduce the risk.