Boost your Grades with us today!
NSG 6430 Discussion: iHuman Case Study – Rachael Hardy
Sample Answer for NSG 6430 Discussion: iHuman Case Study – Rachael Hardy Included After Question
This discussion assignment provides a forum
for discussing relevant topics for this week based on the course competencies
covered. For this assignment, make sure you post your initial response to the
Discussion Area by the due date assigned.
To support your work, use your course
textbook readings and the South University Online Library. As in all
assignments, cite your sources in your work and provide references for the
citations in APA format.
Start reviewing and responding to the postings
of your classmates as early in the week as possible. Respond to at least two of
your classmates’ initial postings. Participate in the discussion by asking a
question, providing a statement of clarification, providing a point of view
with a rationale, challenging an aspect of the discussion, or indicating a
relationship between two or more lines of reasoning in the discussion. Cite
resources in your responses to other classmates. Complete your participation
for this assignment by the end of the week.
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NSG 6430 Discussion: iHuman Case Study – Rachael Hardy
For this assignment, you will complete an
iHuman case study based on the course objectives and weekly content. The iHuman
cases emphasize core learning objectives for an evidence-based primary care
curriculum. Throughout your nurse practitioner program, you will use the iHuman
case studies to promote the development of clinical reasoning through the use
of ongoing assessments and diagnostic skills, and to develop patient care plans
that are grounded in the latest clinical guidelines and evidence-based practice.
The iHuman assignments are highly
interactive and a dynamic way to enhance your learning. Material from the
iHuman cases may be present in the quizzes, the midterm exam, and the final
exam.
Click here for information on how to access
and navigate iHuman.
This week, complete the iHuman case titled
“Rachael Hardy”.
After completing your iHuman Case Study,
answer the following questions using the latest evidenced based guidelines:
Discuss the questions that would be
important to include when interviewing a patient with this issue.
Describe the clinical findings that may be
present in a patient with this issue.
Are there any diagnostic studies that
should be ordered on this patient? Why?
List the primary diagnosis and three
differential diagnoses for this patient. Explain your reasoning for each.
Discuss your management plan for this
patient, including pharmacologic therapies, tests, patient education,
referrals, and follow-ups.
Lopes Write Policy
For assignments that need to be submitted to Lopes Write, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me.
Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes.
Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own?
Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score.
Late Policy
The university’s policy on late assignments is 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies.
Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances.
If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect.
I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension.
As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading.
Communication
Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me:
Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class.
Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours.
Important information for writing discussion questions and participation
Welcome to class
Hello class and welcome to the class and I will be your instructor for this course. This is a -week course and requires a lot of time commitment, organization, and a high level of dedication. Please use the class syllabus to guide you through all the assignments required for the course. I have also attached the classroom policies to this announcement to know your expectations for this course. Please review this document carefully and ask me any questions if you do. You could email me at any time or send me a message via the “message” icon in halo if you need to contact me. I check my email regularly, so you should get a response within 24 hours. If you have not heard from me within 24 hours and need to contact me urgently, please send a follow up text to
I strongly encourage that you do not wait until the very last minute to complete your assignments. Your assignments in weeks 4 and 5 require early planning as you would need to present a teaching plan and interview a community health provider. I advise you look at the requirements for these assignments at the beginning of the course and plan accordingly. I have posted the YouTube link that explains all the class assignments in detail. It is required that you watch this 32-minute video as the assignments from week 3 through 5 require that you follow the instructions to the letter to succeed. Failure to complete these assignments according to instructions might lead to a zero. After watching the video, please schedule a one-on-one with me to discuss your topic for your project by the second week of class. Use this link to schedule a 15-minute session. Please, call me at the time of your appointment on my number. Please note that I will NOT call you.
Please, be advised I do NOT accept any assignments by email. If you are having technical issues with uploading an assignment, contact the technical department and inform me of the issue. If you have any issues that would prevent you from getting your assignments to me by the deadline, please inform me to request a possible extension. Note that working fulltime or overtime is no excuse for late assignments. There is a 5%-point deduction for every day your assignment is late. This only applies to approved extensions. Late assignments will not be accepted.
If you think you would be needing accommodations due to any reasons, please contact the appropriate department to request accommodations.
Plagiarism is highly prohibited. Please ensure you are citing your sources correctly using APA 7th edition. All assignments including discussion posts should be formatted in APA with the appropriate spacing, font, margin, and indents. Any papers not well formatted would be returned back to you, hence, I advise you review APA formatting style. I have attached a sample paper in APA format and will also post sample discussion responses in subsequent announcements.
Your initial discussion post should be a minimum of 200 words and response posts should be a minimum of 150 words. Be advised that I grade based on quality and not necessarily the number of words you post. A minimum of TWO references should be used for your initial post. For your response post, you do not need references as personal experiences would count as response posts. If you however cite anything from the literature for your response post, it is required that you cite your reference. You should include a minimum of THREE references for papers in this course. Please note that references should be no more than 5 years old except recommended as a resource for the class. Furthermore, for each discussion board question, you need ONE initial substantive response and TWO substantive responses to either your classmates or your instructor for a total of THREE responses. There are TWO discussion questions each week, hence, you need a total minimum of SIX discussion posts for each week. I usually post a discussion question each week. You could also respond to these as it would count towards your required SIX discussion posts for the week.
I understand this is a lot of information to cover in 5 weeks, however, the Bible says in Philippians 4:13 that we can do all things through Christ that strengthens us. Even in times like this, we are encouraged by God’s word that we have that ability in us to succeed with His strength. I pray that each and every one of you receives strength for this course and life generally as we navigate through this pandemic that is shaking our world today. Relax and enjoy the course!
Hi Class,
Please read through the following information on writing a Discussion question response and participation posts.
Contact me if you have any questions.
Important information on Writing a Discussion Question
- Your response needs to be a minimum of 150 words (not including your list of references)
- There needs to be at least TWO references with ONE being a peer reviewed professional journal article.
- Include in-text citations in your response
- Do not include quotes—instead summarize and paraphrase the information
- Follow APA-7th edition
- Points will be deducted if the above is not followed
Participation –replies to your classmates or instructor
- A minimum of 6 responses per week, on at least 3 days of the week.
- Each response needs at least ONE reference with citations—best if it is a peer reviewed journal article
- Each response needs to be at least 75 words in length (does not include your list of references)
- Responses need to be substantive by bringing information to the discussion or further enhance the discussion. Responses of “I agree” or “great post” does not count for the word count.
- Follow APA 7th edition
- Points will be deducted if the above is not followed
- Remember to use and follow APA-7th edition for all weekly assignments, discussion questions, and participation points.
- Here are some helpful links
- Student paper example
- Citing Sources
- The Writing Center is a great resource
A Sample Answer For the Assignment: NSG 6430 Discussion: iHuman Case Study – Rachael Hardy
Title: NSG 6430 Discussion: iHuman Case Study – Rachael Hardy
Human Moodle Rubric
Criteria | Exemplary Exceeds Expectations |
Advanced Meets Expectations |
Intermediate Needs Improvement |
Novice Inadequate |
Total Points |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Subjective – 40% | Determined by iHuman
40 points |
Determined by iHuman
36 points |
Determined by iHuman
32 points |
Determined by iHuman
0 points |
40 |
Objective – 25% | Determined by iHuman
25 points |
Determined by iHuman
22 points |
Determined by iHuman
20 points |
Determined by iHuman
0 points |
25 |
Objective – 5% (Testing) | Determined by iHuman
5 points |
Determined by iHuman
4 points |
Determined by iHuman
3 points |
Determined by iHuman
0 points |
5 |
Assessment–5% | Three differential diagnoses are supported by findings and include worst-case scenario.
Rationale for differential diagnoses provided by scholarly resources. 5 points |
Three differential diagnoses include worst-case scenario, but one diagnosis might not be fully supported by findings.
Rationale for differential diagnoses provided by scholarly resources. 3 points |
Differential diagnoses may or may not include worst-case scenario, and two differential diagnoses are not supported by findings.
Rationale for all differential diagnoses not provided by scholarly resources. 1 points |
Fewer than three differential diagnoses identified, or differential diagnoses not supported by findings and do not include worst-case scenario.
Scholarly resources not provided or do not support differential diagnoses. 0 points |
5 |
Plan–25% | Comprehensive plan includes all components:
Appropriate and current guidelines cited. 25 points |
Plan missing one of the identified components:
Appropriate and current guidelines cited. 17 points |
Plan missing two of the identified components:
Guidelines are not current or appropriate for identified problem. 9 points |
Plan missing more than three of the identified components:
Guidelines for plan not cited. 0 points |
25 |
Total Points | 100 |