Boost your Grades with us today!
MSN 6011 DQ1: Critiquing Research and Finding Credible Sources
MSN 6011 DQ1 Critiquing Research and Finding Credible Sources
Note: Remember that there will only be one discussion per
unit for most of this course, because they have been designed to give you
opportunities to conduct additional research. This will require more of your
time than discussions you have had in previous courses. Please plan
accordingly.
The organization you work for has asked you to collect
resources that could support the development of strategies to address one of
the topics of Healthy People 2020. Your organization has also asked you to
explain how the resources you find will contribute to the development of
evidence-based strategies that will lead to improvements toward the Healthy
People 2020 goal and its specific objectives. For one of the resources, your
organization has asked you to do a more thorough critique of its contents and
relevance.
Your post for this discussion will contain three major parts
as outlined below. Each part should address the bullet points listed under it.
Part 1: Identify and Summarize Appropriate Healthy People
2020 Topic and Objectives
Identify and summarize one of the Healthy People 2020
topics, as well as any specific objectives that you will be attempting to
address with the resources you gather.
You may wish to select topics and objectives that are
relevant to your current practice. If you are not currently in a practice
setting, you may wish to think about the type of practice setting you would
like to be working in.
Provide a brief explanation (no more than a sentence or two)
about why your chosen topic and objectives are relevant to your practice.
Part 2: Present and Explain Relevance of Resources to Your
Chosen Topic and Objectives:
Identify a minimum of three credible resources, at least one
of which needs to be a research study, that are relevant to your chosen topic
and objectives.
The Capella University Library is an excellent place to
start your search for these resources.
For each resource address the following (each point only needs
to be a sentence or two):
An explanation of its relevance to your chosen topic and
objectives.
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: MSN 6011 DQ1: Critiquing Research and Finding Credible Sources
An explanation of how information in the resource could be
applied to your practice or organization.
An explanation of why the source is credible.
Part 3: Critique a Research Study
Complete a critique of one of the research studies you
identified using How to Read and take Notes on a Scholarly Article.
Response Guidelines
Review the posts of peers and then select two peers to whom
you would like to respond. In your response be sure to address the
following. Note: Your responses should
be substantive and 100-200 words.
Find an additional resource that is credible and relevant to
the topic and objectives that your peer presented in their initial post.
Offer a 2-3 sentence summary of the content in the resource
you are presenting.
Offer a brief, 1-2 sentence explanation about how the
resource you are presenting would add to those of your peer.
Resources
Discussion Participation Scoring Guide.
2020 Topics and Objectives.
How to Read and take Notes on a Scholarly Article.
MSN 6011 DQ1 Critiquing Research and Finding Credible Sources Grading Rubric
Performance Category | 100% or highest level of performance
100% 16 points |
Very good or high level of performance
88% 14 points |
Acceptable level of performance
81% 13 points |
Inadequate demonstration of expectations
68% 11 points |
Deficient level of performance
56% 9 points
|
Failing level
of performance 55% or less 0 points |
Total Points Possible= 50 | 16 Points | 14 Points | 13 Points | 11 Points | 9 Points | 0 Points |
Scholarliness
Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic topics. |
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three or more of the following elements
|
16 Points | 14 Points | 13 Points | 11 Points | 9 Points | 0 Points | |
Application of Course Knowledge
Demonstrate the ability to analyze and apply principles, knowledge and information learned in the outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations |
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three of the following elements
|
10 Points | 9 Points | 6 Points | 0 Points | |||
Interactive Dialogue
Initial post should be a minimum of 300 words (references do not count toward word count) The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each (references do not count toward word count) Responses are substantive and relate to the topic. |
Demonstrated all of the following:
|
Demonstrated 3 of the following:
|
Demonstrated 2 of the following:
|
Demonstrated 1 or less of the following:
|
||
8 Points | 7 Points | 6 Points | 5 Points | 4 Points | 0 Points | |
Grammar, Syntax, APA
Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing. The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition Error is defined to be a unique APA error. Same type of error is only counted as one error. |
The following was present:
AND
AND
|
The following was present:
AND/OR
AND/OR
|
The following was present:
AND/OR
AND/OR
|
The following was present:
AND/OR
AND/OR
|
The following was present:
AND/OR
AND/OR
AND/OR
|
The following was present:
AND/OR
AND/OR
|
0 Points Deducted | 5 Points Lost | |||||
Participation
Requirements |
Demonstrated the following:
|
Failed to demonstrate the following:
|
||||
0 Points Lost | 5 Points Lost | |||||
Due Date Requirements | Demonstrated all of the following:
A minimum of one peer and one instructor responses are to be posted within the course no later than Sunday, 11:59 pm MT. |
Demonstrates one or less of the following.
A minimum of one peer and one instructor responses are to be posted within the course no later than Sunday, 11:59 pm MT. |