NHS- FP 4000 Assessment One Develop a solution to a specific ethical dilemma faced by a health care professional by applying ethical principles

NHS- FP 4000 Assessment One Develop a solution to a specific ethical dilemma faced by a health care professional by applying ethical principles

NHS- FP 4000 Assessment One Develop a solution to a specific ethical dilemma faced by a health care professional by applying ethical principles

Develop a solution to a specific ethical dilemma faced by a
health care professional by applying ethical principles. Describe the issues
and a possible solution in a 3-5 page paper.

For this assessment, you will develop a solution to a
specific ethical dilemma faced by a health care professional. Read each portion
of the assessment carefully and use the suggested resources to help you
complete the assessment. This assessment provides an opportunity to consider
ethical principles and how they can be applied in health care situations.

Note: The requirements outlined below correspond to the
grading criteria in the scoring guide. At a minimum, be sure to address each
point. In addition, you are encouraged to review the performance level
descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed.

For this assessment, you will develop a solution to a
specific ethical dilemma faced by a health care professional. In your
assessment:

Access the Ethical Case Studies media piece linked in the
Resources to review the case studies you may use for this assessment and select
the case most closely related to your area of interest and use that case study
to complete the assessment.

Note: The case study may not supply all of the information
you may need. In such cases, you should consider a variety of possibilities and
infer potential conclusions. However, please be sure to identify any
assumptions or speculations you make.

NHS- FP 4000 Assessment One Develop a solution to a specific ethical dilemma faced by a health care professional by applying ethical principles
NHS- FP 4000 Assessment One Develop a solution to a specific ethical dilemma faced by a health care professional by applying ethical principles

Identify which case study you selected, briefly summarize
the facts surrounding the case study, and identify the problem or issue in the
case study that presents an ethical dilemma or challenge and describe that
dilemma or challenge.

Use the three components of the ethical decision-making
model (moral awareness, moral judgment, and ethical behavior) found in the
Ethical Decision-Making Model media piece in the Resources to analyze the
ethical issues.

Analyze the factors that contributed to the problem or
issue.

Identify who is involved or affected by the problem or
issue.

Describe the factors that contributed to the problem or
issue and explain how they contributed.

In addition to the readings provided, use the Capella
library to locate at least one academic peer-reviewed journal article relevant
to the problem or issue that you can use to support your analysis of the
situation.

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NHS- FP 4000 Assessment One Develop a solution to a specific ethical dilemma faced by a health care professional by applying ethical principles

Cite and apply the journal article as evidence to support
your critical thinking and analysis of the case.

Assess the credibility of the information source.

Assess the relevance of the information source.

Discuss the effectiveness of the communication approaches
present in the case study.

Describe how the health care professional communicated with
others.

Describe the communication and communication strategies that
were applied, both in creating and in resolving the problems or issues
presented.

Assess instances where the professional communicated
effectively or ineffectively.

Discuss the effectiveness of the approach used by the
professional related to any problems or issues involving ethical practice in
the case.

Describe the actions taken in response to the ethical
dilemma or challenge presented in the case study.

Summarize how well the professional managed professional
responsibilities and priorities to resolve the problem or issue in the case.

Discuss the key lessons this case provides for health care
professionals.

Apply ethical principles to a possible solution to the
proposed problem or issue from the case study.

Describe the proposed solution.

Discuss how the approach makes this professional more
effective or less effective in building relationships across disciplines within
his or her organization.

Discuss how likely it is the proposed solution will foster professional
collaboration.

Write clearly and logically, with correct use of spelling,
grammar, punctuation, and mechanics.

Determine the proper application of the rules of grammar and
mechanics.

Write using APA style for in-text citations, quotes, and
references.

Determine the proper application of APA formatting
requirements and scholarly writing standards.

Apply the principles of effective composition.

Integrate information from outside sources into academic
writing by appropriately quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing, following APA
style.

Example Assessment: You may use the assessment example,
linked in the Assessment Example section of the Resources, to give you an idea
of what a Proficient or higher rating on the scoring guide would look like.

Additional Requirements

Length: At least 3–5 typed, double-spaced pages, not
including the title page and reference page.

Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point.

APA Template: Use the APA Style Paper Template as the paper
format and the APA Style Paper Tutorial for guidance. See the Resources for
these documents.

Written communication: Write clearly and logically, with
correct use of spelling, grammar, punctuation, and mechanics.

References: Integrate information from outside sources to
include at least two references (the case study and an academic peer-reviewed
journal article) and three in-text citations within the paper.

APA format: Follow current APA guidelines for in-text
citation of outside sources in the body of your paper and also on the reference
page.

Turnitin: Submit your assessment to Turnitin prior to
grading. Then, only submit your final assessment to faculty for grading.

Note: Read the Applying Ethical Principles Scoring Guide to
fully understand how your paper will be graded.

Submit your paper for evaluation by clicking on the
assessment title and uploading the paper as a Word document.

If you would like assistance in organizing your assessment,
or if you simply have a question about your assessment, please do not hesitate
to ask your courseroom instructor or the teaching assistants in the NHS Learner
Success Lab for guidance and suggestions.

Attachments area

Dev Health Care Admin Persp

Develop a solution to a specific ethical dilemma faced by a
health care professional by applying ethical principles. Describe the issues
and a possible solution in a 3-5 page paper.

For this assessment, you will develop a solution to a
specific ethical dilemma faced by a health care professional. Read each portion
of the assessment carefully and use the suggested resources to help you
complete the assessment. This assessment provides an opportunity to consider
ethical principles and how they can be applied in health care situations.

Note: The requirements outlined below correspond to the
grading criteria in the scoring guide. At a minimum, be sure to address each
point. In addition, you are encouraged to review the performance level
descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed.

For this assessment, you will develop a solution to a
specific ethical dilemma faced by a health care professional. In your
assessment:

Access the Ethical Case Studies media piece linked in the
Resources to review the case studies you may use for this assessment and select
the case most closely related to your area of interest and use that case study
to complete the assessment.

Note: The case study may not supply all of the information
you may need. In such cases, you should consider a variety of possibilities and
infer potential conclusions. However, please be sure to identify any
assumptions or speculations you make.

Identify which case study you selected, briefly summarize
the facts surrounding the case study, and identify the problem or issue in the
case study that presents an ethical dilemma or challenge and describe that
dilemma or challenge.

Use the three components of the ethical decision-making
model (moral awareness, moral judgment, and ethical behavior) found in the
Ethical Decision-Making Model media piece in the Resources to analyze the
ethical issues.

Analyze the factors that contributed to the problem or
issue.

Identify who is involved or affected by the problem or
issue.

Describe the factors that contributed to the problem or
issue and explain how they contributed.

In addition to the readings provided, use the Capella
library to locate at least one academic peer-reviewed journal article relevant
to the problem or issue that you can use to support your analysis of the
situation.

Cite and apply the journal article as evidence to support
your critical thinking and analysis of the case.

Assess the credibility of the information source.

Assess the relevance of the information source.

Discuss the effectiveness of the communication approaches
present in the case study.

Describe how the health care professional communicated with
others.

Describe the communication and communication strategies that
were applied, both in creating and in resolving the problems or issues
presented.

Assess instances where the professional communicated
effectively or ineffectively.

Discuss the effectiveness of the approach used by the
professional related to any problems or issues involving ethical practice in
the case.

Describe the actions taken in response to the ethical
dilemma or challenge presented in the case study.

Summarize how well the professional managed professional
responsibilities and priorities to resolve the problem or issue in the case.

Discuss the key lessons this case provides for health care
professionals.

Apply ethical principles to a possible solution to the
proposed problem or issue from the case study.

Describe the proposed solution.

Discuss how the approach makes this professional more
effective or less effective in building relationships across disciplines within
his or her organization.

Discuss how likely it is the proposed solution will foster professional
collaboration.

Write clearly and logically, with correct use of spelling,
grammar, punctuation, and mechanics.

Determine the proper application of the rules of grammar and
mechanics.

Write using APA style for in-text citations, quotes, and
references.

Determine the proper application of APA formatting
requirements and scholarly writing standards.

Apply the principles of effective composition.

Integrate information from outside sources into academic
writing by appropriately quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing, following APA
style.

Example Assessment: You may use the assessment example,
linked in the Assessment Example section of the Resources, to give you an idea
of what a Proficient or higher rating on the scoring guide would look like.

Additional Requirements

Length: At least 3–5 typed, double-spaced pages, not
including the title page and reference page.

Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point.

APA Template: Use the APA Style Paper Template as the paper
format and the APA Style Paper Tutorial for guidance. See the Resources for
these documents.

Written communication: Write clearly and logically, with
correct use of spelling, grammar, punctuation, and mechanics.

References: Integrate information from outside sources to
include at least two references (the case study and an academic peer-reviewed
journal article) and three in-text citations within the paper.

APA format: Follow current APA guidelines for in-text
citation of outside sources in the body of your paper and also on the reference
page.

Turnitin: Submit your assessment to Turnitin prior to
grading. Then, only submit your final assessment to faculty for grading.

Note: Read the Applying Ethical Principles Scoring Guide to
fully understand how your paper will be graded.

Submit your paper for evaluation by clicking on the
assessment title and uploading the paper as a Word document.

If you would like assistance in organizing your assessment,
or if you simply have a question about your assessment, please do not hesitate
to ask your courseroom instructor or the teaching assistants in the NHS Learner
Success Lab for guidance and suggestions.

NHS- FP 4000 Assessment One Develop a solution to a specific ethical dilemma faced by a health care professional by applying ethical principles Grading Rubric

Performance Category 100% or highest level of performance

100%

16 points

Very good or high level of performance

88%

14 points

Acceptable level of performance

81%

13 points

Inadequate demonstration of expectations

68%

11 points

Deficient level of performance

56%

9 points

 

Failing level

of performance

55% or less

0 points

 Total Points Possible= 50           16 Points    14 Points 13 Points        11 Points           9 Points          0 Points
Scholarliness

Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic topics.

Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:

  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements:

  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in all of the following elements:

  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
 

Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one of the following elements:

  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
 

Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements:

  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three or more of the following elements

  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information
 16 Points  14 Points  13 Points 11 Points 9 Points  0 Points
Application of Course Knowledge

Demonstrate the ability to analyze and apply principles, knowledge and information learned in the outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations

Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:

  • Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements:

  • Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements:

  • Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one of the following elements:

  • Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from and scholarly resources to a professional experience.
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements:

  • Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three of the following elements

  • Applies principles, knowledge and information and scholarly resources to the required topic.
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned scholarly resources to a professional experience.
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
   10 Points 9 Points  6 Points  0 Points
Interactive Dialogue

Initial post should be a minimum of 300 words (references do not count toward word count)

The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each (references do not count toward word count)

Responses are substantive and relate to the topic.

Demonstrated all of the following:

  • Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words.
  • The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each.
  • Responses are substantive
  • Responses are related to the topic of discussion.
Demonstrated 3 of the following:

  • Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words.
  • The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each.
  • Responses are substantive
  • Responses are related to the topic of discussion.
Demonstrated 2 of the following:

  • Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words.
  • The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each.
  • Responses are substantive
  • Responses are related to the topic of discussion.
Demonstrated 1 or less of the following:

  • Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words.
  • The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each.
  • Responses are substantive
  • Responses are related to the topic of discussion.
  8 Points 7 Points  6 Points         5 Points          4 Points  0 Points
Grammar, Syntax, APA

Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing.

The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition

Error is defined to be a unique APA error. Same type of error is only counted as one error.

The following was present:

  • 0-3 errors in APA format

AND

  • Responses have 0-3 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors

AND

  • Writing style is generally clear, focused on topic,and facilitates communication.
The following was present:

  • 4-6 errors in APA format.

AND/OR

  • Responses have 4-5 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors

AND/OR

  • Writing style is somewhat focused on topic.
The following was present:

  • 7-9 errors in APA format.

AND/OR

  • Responses have 6-7 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors

AND/OR

  • Writing style is slightly focused on topic making discussion difficult to understand.
 

The following was present:

  • 10- 12 errors in APA format

AND/OR

  • Responses have 8-9 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors

AND/OR

  • Writing style is not focused on topic, making discussion difficult to understand.
 

The following was present:

  • 13 – 15 errors in APA format

AND/OR

  • Responses have 8-10 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors

AND/OR

  • Writing style is not focused on topic, making discussion difficult to understand.

AND/OR

  • The student continues to make repeated mistakes in any of the above areas after written correction by the instructor.
The following was present:

  • 16 to greater errors in APA format.

AND/OR

  • Responses have more than 10 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors.

AND/OR

  • Writing style does not facilitate communication
  0 Points Deducted 5 Points Lost
Participation

Requirements

Demonstrated the following:

  • Initial, peer, and faculty postings were made on 3 separate days
Failed to demonstrate the following:

  • Initial, peer, and faculty postings were made on 3 separate days
  0 Points Lost 5 Points Lost
Due Date Requirements Demonstrated all of the following:

  • The initial posting to the graded threaded discussion topic is posted within the course no later than Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT.

A minimum of one peer and one instructor responses are to be posted within the course no later than Sunday, 11:59 pm MT.

Demonstrates one or less of the following.

  • The initial posting to the graded threaded discussion topic is posted within the course no later than Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT.

A minimum of one peer and one instructor responses are to be posted within the course no later than Sunday, 11:59 pm MT.