health intervention for a certain group

health intervention for a certain group

Description

Imagine you are planning a health intervention for a certain group. The first step is to know your intended audience.

Skim through Spector (2017) chapters 9-13, and select ONE racial/ethnic group, which is DIFFERENT from your own or that of your partner or spouse. This should be a group with which you are not very familiar; so, after reading the chapter, you will have more insight into the population than you do so now.

Carefully review the chapter in Spector (2017) that matches the racial/ethnic group that you have chosen; in other words, you only review ONE chapter out of the five possible options.

If you choose to review chapter 9, 11, or 13, then please pay close attention to disparities in income (poverty), age, and gender.

If you choose to review chapters 10 or 12, then please pay close attention to issues of immigration, age, gender, and poverty.

Write a 2-4 page paper using APA 7th edition format (double space, cite sources in paper and as references, paragraph format, free from spelling/grammatical errors) addressing the following:

State which population you chose and summarize (put in your own words while citing the textbook) just five of the eleven sections listed below. Make these very clear so I can easily identify your answers.

(1) brief background and history of the population; (2) traditional definitions of health and illness; (3) traditional methods of health maintenance, protection, and restoration; (4) folk medicine and/or religion, alternative health practices, and rituals; (5) other notable health practices; (6) current health problems; (7) racial disparities in care; (8) views on mental health and/or views on mental health by gender; (9) access to the health care system and/or access to the health care system based on immigration status; (10) special considerations for health care providers; and (11) any additional notable issues you would like to mention. NOTE: Be sure to include info on age, gender, poverty, and immigration (See Above).

Provide your feedback and analysis as a health care practitioner based on what you have learned in the chapter that you reviewed. Here’s how:

Imagine you are planning a health intervention for a certain group. — health intervention for a certain group

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS:health intervention for a certain group

Name at least three things you would do and three things that you would not do when planning a health intervention based on your new level of knowledge about this population.

If you were to plan a health intervention to address one issue mentioned in the chapter, what additional tools and resources do you think you would need in order to be successful?

Address issues of your own cultural and linguistic competency.

What makes planning interventions for a different race/ethnicity/culture both rewarding and challenging at the same time? Feel free to be honest here and use your critical thinking skills.

What is the one greatest insight you had after reviewing this chapter based on another racial, ethnic, or cultural group other than your own.

List the textbook and any other sources you used as references at the end of the paper using APA 7th edition format.

Grid View

	Excellent	Good	Fair	Poor
Main Postinga	45 (45%) – 50 (50%) Answers all parts of the discussion question(s) expectations with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources. Supported by at least three current, credible sources. Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.	40 (40%) – 44 (44%) Responds to the discussion question(s) and is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth. Supported by at least three credible sources. Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.	35 (35%) – 39 (39%) Responds to some of the discussion question(s). One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed. Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis. Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. Post is cited with two credible sources. Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors. Contains some APA formatting errors.	0 (0%) – 34 (34%) Does not respond to the discussion question(s) adequately. Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria. Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis. Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. Contains only one or no credible sources. Not written clearly or concisely. Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors. Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style.
Main Post: Timeliness	10 (10%) – 10 (10%) Posts main post by day 3.	0 (0%) – 0 (0%)	0 (0%) – 0 (0%)	0 (0%) – 0 (0%) Does not post by day 3.
First Response	17 (17%) – 18 (18%) Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings. Responds fully to questions posed by faculty. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources. Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed. Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.	15 (15%) – 16 (16%) Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources. Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.	13 (13%) – 14 (14%) Response is on topic and may have some depth. Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed. Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.	0 (0%) – 12 (12%) Response may not be on topic and lacks depth. Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are missing. No credible sources are cited.
Second Response	16 (16%) – 17 (17%) Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings. Responds fully to questions posed by faculty. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources. Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed. Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.	14 (14%) – 15 (15%) Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources. Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.	12 (12%) – 13 (13%) Response is on topic and may have some depth. Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed. Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.	0 (0%) – 11 (11%) Response may not be on topic and lacks depth. Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are missing. No credible sources are cited.
Participation	5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Meets requirements for participation by posting on three different days.	0 (0%) – 0 (0%)	0 (0%) – 0 (0%)	0 (0%) – 0 (0%) Does not meet requirements for participation by posting on 3 different days.
Total Points: 100