Quiz Corrections Opportunity
Quiz Corrections Opportunity
O Your instructor will reveal the correct answers after all students have submitted Question 1 0/1 McDavid, Huse, and Hawthorne (2013) identify key features that are important in distinguishing impact program evaluation for performance measurement: Which of the following is NOT included in that list? Incorrect Hide other options A Frequency B Issue C Reporting of results D Attribution of outcomes Question 2 0/1 Line-item budgeting systems are characterized by the use of all EXCEPT which of the following: > Incorrect Hide other options A standardized budget formats. B common budget definitions. C) common lines of expenses or revenues. D) a structured budgetary process. Question 3 0/1 In the political model of budgetary process, budgeting decisions are seen as end products of conflict and compromise between competing stakeholders. Which of the following is NOT one of the competing stakeholders listed in your text? Incorrect Hide other options A A Human service agencies and programs B Funding sources C Community leaders D Current and potential clients Question 4 0/1 The time period, called a fiscal year, usually follows one of three time frames. Which of the following is NOT considered to be one of those time frames? Incorrect Hide other options – A June 1 to May 31 B January 1 to Dec 31 C July 1 to June 30 D October 1 to September 30 Question 6 0/1 An impact program evaluation can demonstrate that a human service program includes all EXCEPT which of the following answers: ♡ Incorrect Hide other options A A implemented with a poor program design B successful C unsuccessful due to theory failure D unsuccessful due to program failure Question 10 0/1 Theory failure describes a situation in which a human service program is implemented according to design, but the anticipated outcome is not achieved. Which of the features listed below does NOT describe theory failure? Incorrect Hide other options A Comes about because of a flaw in the hypothesis underlying the program B Certain causal processes will lead directly to the desired outcome C) The hypothesis is not supported when the program is implemented according to the program design, but the result is not the desired outcome D) It is designed to address specific stakeholder questions Question 13 0/1 An analogy that describes how random assignment works would include all EXCEPT which of the components: X Incorrect Hide other options A A people standing in a line. B) a coin is tossed in the air. C) every other person in the line is assigned to the comparison group. D if the coin shows tails, the person is assigned to the experimental group.
| Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | ||
| Main Postinga | 45 (45%) – 50 (50%)
Answers all parts of the discussion question(s) expectations with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.
Supported by at least three current, credible sources.
Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
40 (40%) – 44 (44%)
Responds to the discussion question(s) and is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth.
Supported by at least three credible sources.
Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
35 (35%) – 39 (39%)
Responds to some of the discussion question(s).
One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed.
Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.
Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
Post is cited with two credible sources.
Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors.
Contains some APA formatting errors. |
0 (0%) – 34 (34%)
Does not respond to the discussion question(s) adequately.
Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria.
Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.
Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
Contains only one or no credible sources.
Not written clearly or concisely.
Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors.
Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
|
| Main Post: Timeliness | 10 (10%) – 10 (10%)
Posts main post by day 3. |
0 (0%) – 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Does not post by day 3. |
|
| First Response | 17 (17%) – 18 (18%)
Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.
Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.
Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.
Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
15 (15%) – 16 (16%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.
Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
13 (13%) – 14 (14%)
Response is on topic and may have some depth.
Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.
Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.
Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited. |
0 (0%) – 12 (12%)
Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.
Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.
Responses to faculty questions are missing.
No credible sources are cited. |
|
| Second Response | 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.
Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.
Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.
Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.
Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
12 (12%) – 13 (13%)
Response is on topic and may have some depth.
Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.
Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.
Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited. |
0 (0%) – 11 (11%)
Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.
Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.
Responses to faculty questions are missing.
No credible sources are cited. |
|
| Participation | 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Meets requirements for participation by posting on three different days. |
0 (0%) – 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Does not meet requirements for participation by posting on 3 different days. |
|
| Total Points: 100 | |||||