NUR 513 Describe the characteristics of scholarly nursing research for the advanced registered nurse

Sample Answer for NUR 513 Describe the characteristics of scholarly nursing research for the advanced registered nurse Included After Question

Topic 6 DQ 1

Description:

Review the evidence-based practice project ideas you described in Topic 5 DQ 1. Based on your initial ideas, what types of scholarly nursing research (such as quantitative or qualitative research, peer-reviewed resources , etc.) would be required to fu1ther investigate the issue? Identify the criteria you would use to evaluate the appropriateness of the research. Why is it important to select research that meets these criteria?

A Sample Answer For the Assignment: NUR 513 Describe the characteristics of scholarly nursing research for the advanced registered nurse

Title: NUR 513 Describe the characteristics of scholarly nursing research for the advanced registered nurse

The videos opened my eyes to useful information glaring at me that I had not taken advantage of. When I click the library, the only resource I ever use is the “find journal articles” option. I never click on any of the other resources, this may be due to my busy schedule as I juggle work, home, and school life at the same time. Through these library walk-through videos, I learned awesome resources provided by the university to help me succeed in a less stressful way. Another excuse is that I am a federal employee and with access to books and journals that I can study at any time. One thing that is sure and helpful is that I saved the library’s phone number in my phone which I have used several times. The Librarians are a huge help, every one of the librarians I talked to, always walks me through any difficulty that got me to call them, and at the end of the call, I always feel empowered, knowledgeable, and satisfied.

I now understand the usefulness of “AND, OR, & NOT” when searching the Boolean operators at the library to narrow down my search. One thing that gets me at times is that I tend to forget to limit my search to identify my topic to concepts. Another thing learned is the function of the truncation symbol” as simple as an asterisk. I never knew anything about it and never used it. It makes searching easier and less frustrating.

I always wonder was the function or importance of the limiters which I never touch or use because I always leave them at the default selection, which helps narrow down my results, and gives focus on my search. These walk-through videos are what I call knowledge is power.

A Sample Answer 2 For the Assignment: NUR 513 Describe the characteristics of scholarly nursing research for the advanced registered nurse

Title: NUR 513 Describe the characteristics of scholarly nursing research for the advanced registered nurse

I appreciate the information. It will greatly assist me with doing research. It was nice to see and finally understand all the places that I can click on to help me find a lot of pertinent information. “Explicit knowledge needs to be managed via effective document management systems that allow people to retrieve knowledge easily” (Ayatollahi & Zeraatkar, 2020, p. 99). I have seen the term Boolean before in my searches, but I just did not stop to find out what it meant. It did not stop my search, so I just kept going. I appreciate the information which will help me better tune in to my research topics going forward. I also have been flying by the option to reach out to the librarian. There are many resources available. It is great to see how I do not have to struggle when doing my homework. Yay!! I value all the materials and resources available from the GCU library. I am continuing to work on my citing as well. I always stop and double-check my work. I know that it will get better with continued practice but as of right now, I need to have something to reference. I also appreciate the links available to help me with citing.

Resources

Ayatollahi, H., & Zeraatkar, K. (2020). Factors influencing the success of knowledge management process in health care organizations: a literature review. Health Information & Libraries Journal, 37(2), 98–117. https://doi-org.lopes.idm.oclc.org/10.1111/hir.12285

A Sample Answer 3 For the Assignment: NUR 513 Describe the characteristics of scholarly nursing research for the advanced registered nurse

Title: NUR 513 Describe the characteristics of scholarly nursing research for the advanced registered nurse

I currently work in Utilization Management for a Medicare Advantage plan. One of the quality indicators that are measured is the average length of stay (ALOS) for inpatients in skilled nursing facilities (SNFs). The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) target for the ALOS in a SNF is less than 20 days. In 2020 the average length of stay was 26.3 days (Managing the length of stay at snfs 2023).

To reduce the average length of stay, I would use a quantitative research method to develop surveys for data collection, analyze the statistical data, and develop a plan to reduce the length of stay. According to Kummet (2022), the average length of SNF stay was higher for dually-eligible (person who receives both medicare and medicaid benefits), racial or ethic minorities, depression, and Alzheimer’s disease. I utilized the CRAAP method to evaluate the article as follows:

Currency: the article was published in February 2002. The data was collected in 2014-2015.

Relevancy: The data is relevant identifying possible causes for an increased average length of stay of medicare beneficiaries in skilled nursing facilities

Authority: The article was written by employees of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services and the Federal Health Division of General Dynamics Informational Technology

Accuracy: The data could be verified for accuracy by surveying the SNFs that accept and do not accept dual-eligible (receives both medicare and medicaid benefits) patients and then comparing the average length of stay for both types of facilities during the same time frame to determine if the average length of stay was less than, equal to, or greater than the SNF

Purpose: The purpose of the article is to provide information that could be used to help reduce the average length of stay for those at-risk patients by implementing the discharge planning process and making referrals sooner to prevent delays once the patient is stable for discharge.

 

References:

Kummet, C., Schneider, K., Wang, C., Longinaker, N., Joseph-King, M., Anderson, K., Brecher, A., & Vitolo, S. (2022). Medicare Beneficiary Factors Associated with Skilled Nursing Facility Lengths of Stay. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 41(5), 1365-1375. https://doi.org/10.1177/07334648211062875 

Managing the length of stay at snfs. CareCentrix. (2023, June 27). https://www.carecentrix.com/blog/managing-the-length-of-stay-at-snfs/

A Sample Answer 4 For the Assignment: NUR 513 Describe the characteristics of scholarly nursing research for the advanced registered nurse

Title: NUR 513 Describe the characteristics of scholarly nursing research for the advanced registered nurse

The topic selected for the evidence-based practice project entails differentiating deep tissue injuries (DTIs) from other skin injuries within our in-patient population. DTIs are a concern as it presents the greatest challenge due to the propensity for deterioration to costly, life-altering, full thickness tissue wounds, even with optimal care Sullivan (2022, as cited in EPUAP et al., 2019). DTPIs are challenging in differentiating from other skin injuries such as purpura, hematoma, stage 2 pressure injures and bruises. For this evidence-based project peer review will be utilized. Peer reviews are considered a key mechanism to ensure quality and safety in health care systems (Kaehne et al., 2019). They involve direct (face to face) or indirect (remote) review of services through the analysis of routinely collected data, review of self-reports, and/or observations of care practices (Kaehne et al., 2019).

The article chosen is titled DifferentiatingDeep Tissue Pressure Injury (DTPI) From Other Causes of Purpura in the Sacrococcygeal Area: A Multiple Case Series.

Currency: The copyright year of this article is 2019, which is current for my evidence-based practice project.

Relevance:  Differentiating deep tissue injury from other skin injuries within our in-patient population is a concern because if a diagnosis of the skin injury is mislabeled, patient will receive recommendations of prevention and management that will not be effective. Furthermore, mislabeling may result in falsely elevated hospital-acquired pressure injury prevalence rates, inaccurate data used as a basis for quality improvement projects (Solmos et al., 2019). With that said, information within the article is applicable to my evidence-based project because on multiple case series of differentiating deep tissue injury from other causes of purpura in sacrococcygeal area it focuses. Purpura is one of several skin injuries that is difficult to differentiate from deep tissue injury. Purprua is visible hemorrhage into the skin, appears purple and is non blanched upon application of external pressure (Solmos et al., 2019).

The audience for this journal article includes health care professionals that specialize in wound, ostomy, and continence care, including nurses, physicians, physical therapists, and other health care providers (Wound, Ostomy, and Continence Nurse Society, 2024). I would quote/reference information from this article in my project because it is from a reliable source.

Authority: The article was reviewed and published in the Journal of Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nursing. This is the official journal of the Wound Ostomy and Continence Nurse Society which collaborates closely with The Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nursing Certification Board (WOCNCB). The Journal’s mission is to publish current, best evidence and original research to guide the delivery of expert health care (Wound, Ostomy, and Continence Nurses Society, 2024). This study was reviewed and approved by the University of Chicago Institutional review board (IRB); approval no. IRB17-0457 (Solmos et al., 2019).

The authors consist of physicians and nurses with advanced degrees with certification in wound, ostomy, and continence, which makes them experts in the content of this article. They are affiliated with the University of Chicago Medicine. The primary author’s contact information is provided, and no conflict of interest was reported in this article.

Accuracy: The article is peer reviewed, evidence based and cited correctly. The authors cited articles with similar perspectives. The content is well organized and provides an abstract, background information, purpose of study, method, discussion section that contains limitations of the study and conclusion. The tone of this article is professional language.

Purpose: The purpose of the article is to educate and inform, on three case series of differentiating deep tissue injury from other causes of purpura in sacrococcygeal area. The intended audience for this journal article includes health care professionals that specialize in wound, ostomy, and continence care, including nurses, physicians, physical therapists, and other health care providers (WOCN, 2024). The authors reported there were no conflicts of interest.

The conclusion presented in this article is that the interdisciplinary approach adopted was useful in determining the cause of purpura when the DTPI was ruled out by the certified wound care nurse (Solmos et al., 2019).

 

References:

JWOCN: WOCN society. WOCN. (2023, May 4). https://www.wocn.org/jwocn/

Kaehne, A., Simcock, T., & Onochie, D. (2019, October). A literature review of peer review models in Healthcare. https://research.edgehill.ac.uk/ws/portalfiles/portal/21601436/A_Literature_Review_of_Peer_Review_Models_in_Healthcare.pdf

Solmos, S., Radkevich-Brown, O., & LaFond, C. (2019). Differentiating deep tissue pressure injury (DTPI) from other causes of purpura in the sacrococcygeal area. Journal of Wound, Ostomy & Continence Nursing46(3), 256–262. https://doi.org/10.1097/won.0000000000000525

Sullivan, R. (2022). A Scoping Review of Deep Tissue Pressure Injury Best Practices. MEDSURG Nursing, 31 (4), 239-245 https://eds-s-ebscohost-com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/eds/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=10&sid=c2fb7fce-e8fe-4aba-89d3-f2bff2924203%40redis

Description

Objectives:

1. Describe the characteristics of scholarly nursing research for the advanced registered nurse.
2. Discuss methods for accessing and evaluating nursing research.
3. Relate credibility to academic integrity and evidence-based practice expectations.

II Study Materials

Advanced Practice Nursing: Essential Knowledge for the Profession

Description:

Read Chapters 20-22 in Advanced Practice Nursing: Essential Knowledge for the Profession.

NUR 513 Describe the characteristics of scholarly nursing research for the advanced registered nurse
NUR 513 Describe the characteristics of scholarly nursing research for the advanced registered nurse

lnfom,ation Literacy: The Perils of Online Research

Description:

Watch “Information Literacy: The Perils of Online Research,” by Cambridge Educational (2006), available througb Films on Demand in the GCU Libraty.

Effective Internet Search: Basic Tools and Advanced Strategies

Description:

Watch “Effective Internet Search: Basic Tools and Advanced Strategies,” by Cambridge Educational (2011), available through Films on Demand in the GCU Libra1y.

Researching, Reading, and Writing

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NUR 513 Describe the characteristics of scholarly nursing research for the advanced registered nurse

Description:

Watch “Researching, Reading, and Writing,” by Cambr idge Educational (2009), avai lable througb Films on Demand in the GCU Librruy.

A Scholar Is What a Scholar Writes: Practical Tips on Scholarly Writing

Description:

Read “A Scholru·Is What a Scho lru· Writes: Practical Tips on Scholru·ly Writing,” by Walker, from Joumal of Theory Construction & Testing (2003).

Library Walkthrough Tutorial

Description:

Watch the “Librru·y Walkthrougb Tutoria l” to become familiar w ith the GCU Libra1y.

Critically Analyzing Information Sources: Critical Appraisal and Analysis

Description:

Read “Critically Analyzing Information Sources: Critical Appraisal and Analysis,” located on the Cornell University Library website.

About Turnitin and Plagiarism

Description:

Read the “About Turnitin” and “P lagiarism” sections of the Academic Integrity page of the GCU website.

GCU Library: General Research Guide

Description:

Review the “General Research” guide , located on the GCU Libra1y website.

GCU Library: Persistent Links Research Guide

Description:

Review the “Persistent Links” research guide , located on the GCU Libra1y website, to learn how to locate persistent links for libra1y articles , videos, etc.

RefWorks from the GCU Library

Description:

Manage your citations with the RefWorks tool , located on the GCU Libra1y website. RefWorks automates the creation of your reference lists in the format of your choice (APA, MLA, etc.).

GCU Library: Nursing and Health Sciences Research Guide

Description:

Review the “Nursing and Health Sciences” research guid e, located on the GCU Library website.

Grading Rubric Guidelines

Performance Category 10 9 8 4 0
Scholarliness

Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic decisions.

  • Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry clearly stating how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions
  • Evaluates literature resources to develop a comprehensive analysis or synthesis.
  • Uses valid, relevant, and reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion
  • Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry but does not clearly state how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
  • Evaluates information from source(s) to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis.
  • Uses some valid, relevant, reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion.
  • Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
  • Information is taken from source(s) with some interpretation/evaluation, but not enough to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis.
  • Little valid, relevant, or reliable outside sources are used to contribute to the threaded discussion.
  • Demonstrates little or no understanding of the topic.
  • Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
  • Information is taken from source(s) without any interpretation/evaluation.
  • The posting uses information that is not valid, relevant, or reliable
  • No evidence of the use of scholarly inquiry to inform or change professional or academic decisions.
  • Information is not valid, relevant, or reliable
Performance Category  10 9 8 4 0
Application of Course Knowledge –

Demonstrate the ability to analyze, synthesize, and/or apply principles and concepts learned in the course lesson and outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations

  • Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources;
  • Applies concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life.
  • Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources.
  • Applies concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
  • Interactions with classmates are relevant to the discussion topic but do not make direct reference to lesson content
  • Posts are generally on topic but do not build knowledge by incorporating concepts and principles from the lesson.
  • Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
  • Does not demonstrate a solid understanding of the principles and concepts presented in the lesson
  • Posts do not adequately address the question posed either by the discussion prompt or the instructor’s launch post.
  • Posts are superficial and do not reflect an understanding of the lesson content
  • Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
  • Posts are not related to the topics provided by the discussion prompt or by the instructor; attempts by the instructor to redirect the student are ignored
  • No discussion of lesson concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life
Performance Category  5 4 3 2 0
Interactive Dialogue

Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days.

(5 points possible per graded thread)

  • Exceeds minimum post requirements
  • Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts three or more times in each graded thread, over three separate days.
  • Replies to a post posed by faculty and to a peer
  • Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week.
  • Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days
  • Replies to a question posed by a peer

Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week.

  • Meets expectations of 2 posts on 2 different days.
  • The main post is not made by the Wednesday deadline
  • Does not reply to a question posed by a peer or faculty
  • Has only one post for the week
  • Discussion posts contain few, if any, new ideas or applications; often are a rehashing or summary of other students’ comments
  • Does not post to the thread
  • No connections are made to the topic
  Minus 1 Point Minus 2 Point Minus 3 Point Minus 4 Point Minus 5 Point
Grammar, Syntax, APA

Note: if there are only a few errors in these criteria, please note this for the student in as an area for improvement. If the student does not make the needed corrections in upcoming weeks, then points should be deducted.

Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing.

The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition

  • 2-3 errors in APA format.
  • Written responses have 2-3 grammatical, spelling, and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is generally clear, focused, and facilitates communication.
  • 4-5 errors in APA format.
  • Writing responses have 4-5 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is somewhat focused.
  • 6-7 errors in APA format.
  • Writing responses have 6-7 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is slightly focused making discussion difficult to understand.
  • 8-10 errors in APA format.
  • Writing responses have 8-10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is not focused, making discussion difficult to understand.
  • Post contains greater than 10 errors in APA format.
  • Written responses have more than 10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style does not facilitate communication.
  • The student continues to make repeated mistakes in any of the above areas after written correction by the instructor
0 points lost       -5 points lost
Total Participation Requirements

per discussion thread

The student answers the threaded discussion question or topic on one day and posts a second response on another day. The student does not meet the minimum requirement of two postings on two different days
Early Participation Requirement

per discussion thread

The student must provide a substantive answer to the graded discussion question(s) or topic(s), posted by the course instructor (not a response to a peer), by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT of each week. The student does not meet the requirement of a substantive response to the stated question or topic by Wednesday at 11:59 pm MT.