DNP 801 Topic 6 DQ 2 Explain the process you are using to review and incorporate instructor feedback on assignments before the next submission -

DNP 801 Topic 6 DQ 2 Explain the process you are using to review and incorporate instructor feedback on assignments before the next submission

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: DNP 801 Topic 6 DQ 2 Explain the process you are using to review and incorporate instructor feedback on assignments before the next submission

Instructor feedback is intended to help you improve the quality of your DPI Project. However, in order to succeed, you must be open to hearing and accepting feedback. Explain the process you are using to review and incorporate instructor feedback on assignments before the next submission. As you review feedback, how can the practice of reflective learning help you create an objective and open mind? How can you use reflective learning in moments where you may feel resistant to feedback?

To help you understand your process, consider the following:

Can you locate all the feedback on your returned documents (comments, track changes, etc.)?
As you review instructor feedback, how do you incorporate it so you are sure it creates improvement?
What you are doing if you do not understand the feedback?

REPLY TO DISCUSSION

CS

Carolyn Smith

Posted Date

Mar 30, 2022, 7:42 PM(edited)

Status

Published

As implied, feedback is someone’s constructive reactions or critique to another person’s performance of a task or quality of a product, etc which is mostly used as a basis for improvement (Oxford Dictionary). On this premise, my instructor’s feedback is very invaluable in my academic work. It constructively critiques my work, reviews the previous assignments that gears me in the right direction. Constructive feedbacks by instructors and faculty members have positive effects on the learning process. I perceive my instructor’s feedback as an important tool to help me in identifying my mistakes and stop repeating those mistakes. ((Wulandari & Anugerahwat, 2021). I have benefitted from these feedbacks in the past and even now as I know where to go and access these feedbacks on the class wall. Once I view my grades, I quickly go to the “View Feedback” tab. Most times the feedback is a source of encouragement and reinforcement that propels the student to work harder.

Reflective learning is a way of looking back on what has been learned so far. It’s like taking stock of one’s learning experiences and a self-analysis of such experiences. (Toolshero). Reflective learning helps us to examine what we have learned and the learning process and improves our critical thinking skills. It assists with making connections between what has already been learned and what is being learned. Reflective learning helps one to learn from mistakes by identifying how to do things differently and encourages the DNP learner to become a reflective practitioner in their future career (Deakin University).

References DNP 801 Topic 6 DQ 2 Explain the process you are using to review and incorporate instructor feedback on assignments before the next submission

Oxford Dictionary

Reflective Learning – Toolshero

www.toolshero.com/personal-development/reflective-learning/

Reflective learning | Students – Deakin University

ES

Posted Date

Mar 28, 2022, 10:37 PM

Unread

As mentioned, feedback is intended to help and improve. I rely heavily on instructor suggestions, feedback, and constructive criticism to review assignments before the next submission. As a reflective learner, I analyze, utilize critical thinking skills, and do further research based on feedback in order to improve. Reflective learning has multiple benefits such as a personal assessment of the concepts learned and how they were learned, growth and development in critical thinking, connecting new concepts with those already known, assists with learning from previous errors by identifying which path can be taken next time, and encourages you to continue utilizing a reflective practice (Reflective Learning, n.d.).

Reflective learning help students and professionals maintain educational competencies. A study was completed in South Africa on 121 nurse educators regarding the use and concept of reflective teaching. Although all educators reported reflective learning is needed, there was not a formal method to incorporate reflective learning activities. Based on the results, educators should receive formal training on reflective teaching as this learning approach promotes critical thinking, especially in the field of nursing (Naicker & Rensenburg 2018).

I have familiarized myself with the locations of feedback on the assignment gradebook. When I am unsure on how to make changes based on feedback or if I am uncertain, I always message or reach out to our professor via telephone in order to clarify the feedback. This assists with open-ended dialogue and gives me further insight on how I can make the assignment meet the requirements. This also gives me a bigger understanding of the DPI project process and puts me at ease during moments of anxiety.

Naicker, K., & Van Rensburg, G. H. (2018). Facilitation of reflective learning in nursing: Reflective teaching practices of educators. Africa Journal of Nursing and Midwifery, 20(2). https://doi.org/10.25159/2520-5293/3386

University, D. (n.d.). Reflective learning. Deakin University. Retrieved March 28, 2022, from https://www.deakin.edu.au/students/studying/study-support/academic-skills/reflective-learning

DNP 801 Topic 6 DQ 2 Explain the process you are using to review and incorporate instructor feedback on assignments before the next submission Grading Rubric Guidelines

Performance Category	10	9	8	4	0
Scholarliness Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic decisions.	Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry clearly stating how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions Evaluates literature resources to develop a comprehensive analysis or synthesis. Uses valid, relevant, and reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion	Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry but does not clearly state how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions. Evaluates information from source(s) to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis. Uses some valid, relevant, reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion.	Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions. Information is taken from source(s) with some interpretation/evaluation, but not enough to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis. Little valid, relevant, or reliable outside sources are used to contribute to the threaded discussion. Demonstrates little or no understanding of the topic.	Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions. Information is taken from source(s) without any interpretation/evaluation. The posting uses information that is not valid, relevant, or reliable	No evidence of the use of scholarly inquiry to inform or change professional or academic decisions. Information is not valid, relevant, or reliable
Performance Category	10	9	8	4	0
Application of Course Knowledge – Demonstrate the ability to analyze, synthesize, and/or apply principles and concepts learned in the course lesson and outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations	Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources; Applies concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life.	Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources. Applies concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life Interactions with classmates are relevant to the discussion topic but do not make direct reference to lesson content	Posts are generally on topic but do not build knowledge by incorporating concepts and principles from the lesson. Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life Does not demonstrate a solid understanding of the principles and concepts presented in the lesson	Posts do not adequately address the question posed either by the discussion prompt or the instructor’s launch post. Posts are superficial and do not reflect an understanding of the lesson content Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life	Posts are not related to the topics provided by the discussion prompt or by the instructor; attempts by the instructor to redirect the student are ignored No discussion of lesson concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life
Performance Category	5	4	3	2	0
Interactive Dialogue Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days. *(5 points possible per graded thread)*	Exceeds minimum post requirements Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts three or more times in each graded thread, over three separate days. Replies to a post posed by faculty and to a peer Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week.	Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days Replies to a question posed by a peer Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week.	Meets expectations of 2 posts on 2 different days. The main post is not made by the Wednesday deadline Does not reply to a question posed by a peer or faculty	Has only one post for the week Discussion posts contain few, if any, new ideas or applications; often are a rehashing or summary of other students’ comments	Does not post to the thread No connections are made to the topic
	Minus 1 Point	Minus 2 Point	Minus 3 Point	Minus 4 Point	Minus 5 Point
Grammar, Syntax, APA Note: if there are only a few errors in these criteria, please note this for the student in as an area for improvement. If the student does not make the needed corrections in upcoming weeks, then points should be deducted. Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing. The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition	2-3 errors in APA format. Written responses have 2-3 grammatical, spelling, and punctuation errors. Writing style is generally clear, focused, and facilitates communication.	4-5 errors in APA format. Writing responses have 4-5 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors. Writing style is somewhat focused.	6-7 errors in APA format. Writing responses have 6-7 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors. Writing style is slightly focused making discussion difficult to understand.	8-10 errors in APA format. Writing responses have 8-10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors. Writing style is not focused, making discussion difficult to understand.	Post contains greater than 10 errors in APA format. Written responses have more than 10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors. Writing style does not facilitate communication. The student continues to make repeated mistakes in any of the above areas after written correction by the instructor
	0 points lost				-5 points lost
Total Participation Requirements *per discussion thread*	The student answers the threaded discussion question or topic on one day and posts a second response on another day.				The student does not meet the minimum requirement of two postings on two different days
Early Participation Requirement *per discussion thread*	The student must provide a substantive answer to the graded discussion question(s) or topic(s), posted by the course instructor (not a response to a peer), by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT of each week.				The student does not meet the requirement of a substantive response to the stated question or topic by Wednesday at 11:59 pm MT.

Check Out Also: DNP 801 Topic 6 DQ 1 Review the Literature Evaluation Table