SOAP Note Assignment

SOAP Note Assignment

Sample Answer for SOAP Note Assignment Included After Question

Description

Click  here  to download and analyze the case study for this week. Create a SOAP  note for disease prevention, health promotion, and acute care of the  patient in the clinical case. Your care plan should be based on current  evidence and nursing standards of care.

Visit the online library and research for current scholarly evidence  (no older than 5 years) to support your nursing actions. In addition,  consider visiting government sites such as the CDC, WHO, AHRQ, Healthy  People 2020. Provide a detailed scientific rationale justifying the  inclusion of this evidence in your plan.

Next determine the ICD-10 classification (diagnoses). The  International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical  Modification (ICD-10-CM) is the official system used in the United  States to classify and assign codes to health conditions and related  information.

Click here to access the codes.

Download the SOAP template  to help you design a holistic patient care plan. Utilize the SOAP  guidelines to assist you in creating your SOAP note and building your  plan of care. You are expected to develop a comprehensive SOAP note  based on the given assessment, diagnosis, and advanced nursing  interventions. Reflect on what you have learned about care plans through  independent research and peer discussions and incorporate the knowledge  that you have gained into your patient’s care plan.  If the information  is not in the provided scenario please consider it normal for SOAP note  purposes, if it is abnormal please utilize what you know about the  disease process and write what you would expect in the subjective and  objective areas of your note.

A Sample Answer For the Assignment: SOAP Note Assignment

Title:  SOAP Note Assignment

Week 2: Respiratory Clinical Case Patient Setting: 65 year old Caucasian female that was discharged from the hospital 10 weeks ago after a motor vehicle accident presents to the clinic today. States she is having severe wheezing, shortness of breath and coughing at least once daily. She can barely get her words out without taking breaks to catch her breath and states she has taken albuterol once today. HPI Frequent asthma attacks for the past 2 months (more than 4 times per week average), serious MVA 10 weeks ago; post traumatic seizure 2 weeks after the accident; anticonvulsant phenytoin started – no seizure activity since initiation of therapy. PMH History of periodic asthma attacks since early 20s; mild congestive heart failure diagnosed 3 years ago; placed on sodium restrictive diet and hydrochlorothiazide; last year placed on enalapril due to worsening CHF; symptoms well controlled the last year. Past Surgical History None Family/Social History Family: Father died age 59 of kidney failure secondary to HTN; Mother died age 62 of CHF Social: Nonsmoker; no alcohol intake; caffeine use: 4 cups of coffee and 4 diet colas per day. Medication History Theophylline SR Capsules 300 mg PO BID Albuterol inhaler, PRN Phenytoin SR capsules 300 mg PO QHS HTCZ 50 mg PO BID Enalapril 5 mg PO BID Allergies NKDA ROS Positive for shortness of breath, coughing, wheezing and exercise intolerance. Denies headache, swelling in the extremities and seizures. Physical exam BP 171/94, HR 122, RR 31, T 96.7 F, Wt 145, Ht 5’ 3” VS after Albuterol breathing treatment – BP 134/79, HR 80, RR 18 Gen: Pale, well developed female appearing anxious. HEENT: PERRLA, oral cavity without lesions, TM without signs of inflammation, no nystagmus noted. Cardio: Regular rate and rhythm normal S1 and S2. Chest: Bilateral expiratory wheezes. Abd: soft, non-tender, non-distended no masses. GU: Unremarkable. Rectal: Guaiac negative. EXT: +1 ankle edema, on right, no bruising, normal pulses. NEURO: A&O X3, cranial nerves intact. Laboratory and Diagnostic Testing Na – 134 K – 4.9 Cl – 100 BUN – 21 Cr – 1.2 Glu – 110 ALT – 24 AST – 27 Total Chol – 190 CBC – WNL Theophylline – 6.2 Phenytoin – 17 Chest Xray – Blunting of the right and left costophrenic angles Peak Flow – 75/min; after albuterol – 102/min FEV1 – 1.8 L; FVC 3.0 L, FEV1/FVC 60% Running head: NAME OF CARE PLAN 1 Title of Plan of Care Name South University Online Faculty Name NSG 6001 Date NAME PLAN OF CARE 2 **Please delete this statement and anything in italics prior to submission to shorten the length of your paper. Patient Initials ______ Subjective Data: (Information the patient tells you regarding themselves: Biased Information): Chief Compliant: (In patient’s exact words) History of Present Illness: (Analysis of current problems in chronologic order using symptom analysis [onset, location, frequency, quality, quantity, aggravating/alleviating factors, associated symptoms and treatments tried]). PMH/Medical/Surgical History: (Includes medications and why taking, allergies, other major medical problems, immunizations, injuries, hospitalizations, surgeries, psychiatric history, obstetric and history sexual history). Significant Family History: (Includes family members and specific inheritable diseases). Social History: (Includes home living situation, marital history, cultural background, health habits, lifestyle/recreation, religious practices, educational background, occupational history, financial security and family history of violence). Review of Symptoms: (Review each body system – This section you should place POSITIVE for… information in the beginning then state Denies…). – General:; Integumentary:; Head:; Eyes: ; ENT:; Cardiovascular:; Respiratory: ; Gastrointestinal:; Genitourinary:; Musculoskeletal:; Neurological:; Endocrine:; Hematologic:; Psychologic: . Objective Data: Vital Signs: BP – ; P ; R ; T ; Wt. ; Ht. ; BMI . Physical Assessment Findings: (Includes full head to toe review) HEENT: Lymph Nodes: Carotids: Lungs: Heart: Abdomen: Genital/Pelvic: Rectum: Extremities/Pulses: Neurologic: Laboratory and Diagnostic Test Results: (Include result and interpretation.) Assessment: (Include at least 3 priority diagnosis with ICD-10 codes. Please place in order of priority.) Plan of Care: (Addressing each dx with diagnostic and therapeutic management as well as education and counseling provided). NAME PLAN OF CARE 3 References

  Excellent Good Fair Poor
Main Postinga 45 (45%) – 50 (50%)

Answers all parts of the discussion question(s) expectations with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.

 

Supported by at least three current, credible sources.

 

Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

40 (40%) – 44 (44%)

Responds to the discussion question(s) and is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

 

At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth.

 

Supported by at least three credible sources.

 

Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

35 (35%) – 39 (39%)

Responds to some of the discussion question(s).

 

One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed.

 

Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.

 

Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

 

Post is cited with two credible sources.

 

Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors.

 

Contains some APA formatting errors.

0 (0%) – 34 (34%)

Does not respond to the discussion question(s) adequately.

 

Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria.

 

Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.

 

Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

 

Contains only one or no credible sources.

 

Not written clearly or concisely.

 

Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors.

 

Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style.

Main Post: Timeliness 10 (10%) – 10 (10%)

Posts main post by day 3.

0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

Does not post by day 3.

First Response 17 (17%) – 18 (18%)

Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.

 

Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.

 

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.

 

Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.

 

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

 

Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.

 

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

15 (15%) – 16 (16%)

Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.

 

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

 

Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.

 

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.

 

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

13 (13%) – 14 (14%)

Response is on topic and may have some depth.

 

Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.

 

Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.

 

Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.

0 (0%) – 12 (12%)

Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.

 

Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.

 

Responses to faculty questions are missing.

 

No credible sources are cited.

Second Response 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)

Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.

 

Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.

 

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.

 

Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.

 

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

 

Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.

 

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

14 (14%) – 15 (15%)

Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.

 

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

 

Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.

 

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.

 

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

12 (12%) – 13 (13%)

Response is on topic and may have some depth.

 

Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.

 

Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.

 

Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.

0 (0%) – 11 (11%)

Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.

 

Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.

 

Responses to faculty questions are missing.

 

No credible sources are cited.

Participation 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Meets requirements for participation by posting on three different days.

0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

Does not meet requirements for participation by posting on 3 different days.

Total Points: 100