NRS 451 Discussion: Emotional Intelligence for Effective Leadership

NRS 451 Discussion: Emotional Intelligence for Effective Leadership

NRS 451 Discussion: Emotional Intelligence for Effective Leadership

Topic 2 DQ 1

Description:

 One of the five elements of emotional intelligence is self-awareness. Explain why emotional intelligence is crucial for effective leadership. Discuss what behaviors someone with a high degree of self-awareness would demonstrate within the context of leading and managing groups. Provide an example.

 

Description:

In this assignment, you will be writing a 1,000-1,250 word paper describing the differing approaches of nursing leaders and managers to issues in practice. To complete this assignment, do the following:

1. Select an issue from the following list: bullying, unit closers and restructuring, floating, nurse turnover, nurse staffing ratios, use of contract employees (i.e., registry and travel nurses), or magnet designation.
2. Describe the selected issue. Discuss how it impacts quality of care and patient safety in the setting in which it occurs.
3. Discuss how professional standards of practice should be demonstrated in this situation to help rectify the issue or maintain professional conduct.
4. Explain the differing roles of nursing leaders and nursing managers in this instance and discuss the different approaches they take to address the selected issue and promote patient safety and quality care. Support your rationale by using the theories, principles, skills, and roles of the leader versus manager described in your readings.
5. Discuss what additional aspects mangers and leaders would need to initiate in order to ensure professionalism throughout diverse health care settings while addressing the selected issue.
6. Describe a leadership style that would best address the chosen issue. Explain why this style could be successful in this setting.

NRS 451 Discussion Emotional Intelligence for Effective Leadership
NRS 451 Discussion Emotional Intelligence for Effective Leadership

Use at least three peer-reviewed journal articles other than those presented in your text or provided in the course.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance.

This benchmark assignment assesses the following programmatic competencies: RN to BSN
1.1: Exemplify professionalism in diverse health care settings.

1.3: Exercise professional nursing leadership and management roles in the promotion of patient safety and quality care.

3.4 : Demonstrate professional standards of practice.

Description

Objectives:

1. Explain the role of a nursing leader in quality patient care.
2. Explain the role of a nurse manager in quality patient care.
3. Discuss the importance of emotional intelligence in working with groups.
4. Examine leadership styles conducive to addressing nursing issues.

Nursing Leadership and Management: Leading and Serving

Description:

Read Chapter 2 in Nursing Leadership and Management: Leading and Serving.

The Impact of Nurse Manager’s Leadership Styles on Ward Staff

Description:

Read “The Impact of Nurse Manager’s Leadership Styles on Ward Staff,” by Saleh et al., from British Journal of Nursing
(2018).

Code of Ethics for Nurse With Interpretive Statements

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NRS 451 Discussion: Emotional Intelligence for Effective Leadership

Description:

Review “Code of Ethics for Nurse With Interpretive Statements,” by the American Nurses Association (ANA) (2015), located on the ANA website.

Nurse Manager Risk Information Management for Decision-Making: A Qualitative Analysis

Description:

Read “Nurse Manager Risk Information Management for Decision-Making: A Qualitative Analysis,” by Islam, Hutchinson, and Bucknall, from Collegian(2017).

They Lived Experiences of Becoming First-Line Nurse Managers: A Phenomenological Study

Description:

Read “They Lived Experiences of Becoming First-Line Nurse Managers: A Phenomenological Study,” by Guanawan, Aungsuroch, Nazliansyah, and Sukarna, from Iranian Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Research (2018).

Nurse Managers’ Insights Regarding Their Role Highlight the Need for Practice Changes

Description:

Nurse Managers’ Insights Regarding Their Role Highlight the Need for Practice Changes,” by Moore, Sublett, and Leahy, from Applied Nursing Research(2016).

Personality Characteristics of Nurse Managers: The Personal and Professional Factors that Affect Their Performance

Description:

Read “Personality Characteristics of Nurse Managers: The Personal and Professional Factors that Affect Their Performance,” by Handan and Uiku, from Journal of Psychiatric Nursing(2018).

Understanding the Role of the Nurse Manager: The Full-Range Leadership Theory Perspective

Description:

Read “Understanding the Role of the Nurse Manager: The Full-Range Leadership Theory Perspective,” by Witges and Scanlan, from Nurse Leader(2014).

Assessing the Nurse Manager’s Span of Control: A Partnership Between Executive Leadership, Nurse Scientists and Clinicians

Description:

Read “Assessing the Nurse Manager’s Span of Control: A Partnership Between Executive Leadership, Nurse Scientists and Clinicians,” by Cupit, Stout-Aguilar, Cannon and Norton, from Nurse Leader(2019).

Student Nurses’ Perceptions of the Nurse Manger as a Servant Leader

Description:

Read “Student Nurses’ Perceptions of the Nurse Manger as a ‘Servant Leader,'” by Jooste and Jordaan, from Africa Journal of Nursing and Midwifery(2012).

A Servant Leader and Their Stakeholders: When Does Organizational Structure Enhance Leader’s Influence?

Description:

Read “A Servant Leader and Their Stakeholders: When Does Organizational Structure Enhance Leader’s Influence?” by Neubert, Hunter, and Tolentino, from The Leadership Quarterly(2016).

Growing Nurse Leaders: Their Perspectives on Nursing Leadership and Today’s Practice Environment

Description:

Read “Growing Nurse Leaders: Their Perspectives on Nursing Leadership and Today’s Practice Environment,” by Dyess, Sherman, Pratt, and Chiang-Hanisko, from Online Journal of Issues in Nursing(2016).

NRS 451 Discussion: Emotional Intelligence for Effective Leadership Grading Rubric Guidelines

Performance Category 10 9 8 4 0
Scholarliness

Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic decisions.

  • Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry clearly stating how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions
  • Evaluates literature resources to develop a comprehensive analysis or synthesis.
  • Uses valid, relevant, and reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion
  • Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry but does not clearly state how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
  • Evaluates information from source(s) to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis.
  • Uses some valid, relevant, reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion.
  • Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
  • Information is taken from source(s) with some interpretation/evaluation, but not enough to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis.
  • Little valid, relevant, or reliable outside sources are used to contribute to the threaded discussion.
  • Demonstrates little or no understanding of the topic.
  • Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
  • Information is taken from source(s) without any interpretation/evaluation.
  • The posting uses information that is not valid, relevant, or reliable
  • No evidence of the use of scholarly inquiry to inform or change professional or academic decisions.
  • Information is not valid, relevant, or reliable
Performance Category  10 9 8 4 0
Application of Course Knowledge –

Demonstrate the ability to analyze, synthesize, and/or apply principles and concepts learned in the course lesson and outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations

  • Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources;
  • Applies concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life.
  • Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources.
  • Applies concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
  • Interactions with classmates are relevant to the discussion topic but do not make direct reference to lesson content
  • Posts are generally on topic but do not build knowledge by incorporating concepts and principles from the lesson.
  • Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
  • Does not demonstrate a solid understanding of the principles and concepts presented in the lesson
  • Posts do not adequately address the question posed either by the discussion prompt or the instructor’s launch post.
  • Posts are superficial and do not reflect an understanding of the lesson content
  • Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
  • Posts are not related to the topics provided by the discussion prompt or by the instructor; attempts by the instructor to redirect the student are ignored
  • No discussion of lesson concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life
Performance Category  5 4 3 2 0
Interactive Dialogue

Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days.

(5 points possible per graded thread)

  • Exceeds minimum post requirements
  • Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts three or more times in each graded thread, over three separate days.
  • Replies to a post posed by faculty and to a peer
  • Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week.
  • Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days
  • Replies to a question posed by a peer

Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week.

  • Meets expectations of 2 posts on 2 different days.
  • The main post is not made by the Wednesday deadline
  • Does not reply to a question posed by a peer or faculty
  • Has only one post for the week
  • Discussion posts contain few, if any, new ideas or applications; often are a rehashing or summary of other students’ comments
  • Does not post to the thread
  • No connections are made to the topic
  Minus 1 Point Minus 2 Point Minus 3 Point Minus 4 Point Minus 5 Point
Grammar, Syntax, APA

Note: if there are only a few errors in these criteria, please note this for the student in as an area for improvement. If the student does not make the needed corrections in upcoming weeks, then points should be deducted.

Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing.

The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition

  • 2-3 errors in APA format.
  • Written responses have 2-3 grammatical, spelling, and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is generally clear, focused, and facilitates communication.
  • 4-5 errors in APA format.
  • Writing responses have 4-5 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is somewhat focused.
  • 6-7 errors in APA format.
  • Writing responses have 6-7 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is slightly focused making discussion difficult to understand.
  • 8-10 errors in APA format.
  • Writing responses have 8-10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is not focused, making discussion difficult to understand.
  • Post contains greater than 10 errors in APA format.
  • Written responses have more than 10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style does not facilitate communication.
  • The student continues to make repeated mistakes in any of the above areas after written correction by the instructor
0 points lost       -5 points lost
Total Participation Requirements

per discussion thread

The student answers the threaded discussion question or topic on one day and posts a second response on another day. The student does not meet the minimum requirement of two postings on two different days
Early Participation Requirement

per discussion thread

The student must provide a substantive answer to the graded discussion question(s) or topic(s), posted by the course instructor (not a response to a peer), by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT of each week. The student does not meet the requirement of a substantive response to the stated question or topic by Wednesday at 11:59 pm MT.