Boost your Grades with us today!
Sample Answer for NURS 6512N Assignment: Ethical Concerns on Assessments Included After Question
As an advanced practice nurse, you will run into situations where a patient’s wishes about his or her health conflict with evidence, your own experience, or a family’s wishes. This may create an ethical dilemma. What do you do when these situations occur?
In this Lab Assignment, you will explore evidence-based practice guidelines and ethical considerations for specific scenarios.
To Prepare
Review the scenarios provided by your instructor for this week’s Assignment. Please see the “Course Announcements” section of the classroom for your scenarios.
Based on the scenarios provided:
-
- Select onescenario, and reflect on the material presented throughout this course.
- What necessary information would need to be obtained about the patient through health assessments and diagnostic tests?
- Consider how you would respond as an advanced practice nurse. Review evidence-based practice guidelines and ethical considerations applicable to the scenarios you selected.
The Lab Assignment
Write a detailed one-page narrative (not a formal paper) explaining the health assessment information required for a diagnosis of your selected patient (include the scenario number). Explain how you would respond to the scenario as an advanced practice nurse using evidence-based practice guidelines and applying ethical considerations. Justify your response using at least three different references from current evidence-based literature.
By Day 6 of Week 11
Submit your Assignment.
Submission and Grading Information
To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:
- Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK11Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
- Click the Week 11 Assignment Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
- Click the Week 11 Assignment You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
- Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer Find the document you saved as “WK11Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.
- If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
- Click on the Submitbutton to complete your submission.
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NURS 6512N Assignment: Ethical Concerns on Assessments
A Sample Answer For the Assignment: NURS 6512N Assignment: Ethical Concerns on Assessments
Title: NURS 6512N Assignment: Ethical Concerns on Assessments
Immunization is an important component of health promotion for all children in the US. All the states require that children should be fully vaccinated before they begin their education. However, 47 states consider exemptions due to religious or philosophical reasons. Vaccinations are important in preventing unnecessary hospitalizations as well as mortalities. Therefore, it would be important for nurse practitioner to seek additional information from the parents about their reasons for opposing vaccination for their son. Often, parents decline vaccinations for their children due to the influence of factors such as religious beliefs and practice. The nurse practitioners should obtain information related to the religious affiliation of the family, beliefs and practice and their influence on the uptake on immunization services (Giubilini, 2021). The information on the religious beliefs, values and practices of the family will provide the nurse practitioner with the insights into the factors contributing to the decisions that the parents are making.
The nurse practitioner should also determine the knowledge and attitude of the family towards immunization. Information such as the knowledge of the parents about the benefits and risks of immunization should be obtained. The nurse practitioner should also obtained information about the fears and misconceptions that the family might have towards immunization. Low level of knowledge or misconceptions may affect the utilization of immunization services by the family (Berry et al., 2017). As a result, the nurse practitioner should educate the family about the benefits of immunization alongside the anticipated side effects. The nurse practitioner may utilize educational resources such as videos and photographs of the consequences of failing to immunize their child to increase the level of understanding of the patients (Mossey et al., 2020). Health education will help the family to make informed decisions about whether their son should be immunized or not.
References
Berry, N. J., Henry, A., Danchin, M., Trevena, L. J., Willaby, H. W., & Leask, J. (2017). When parents won’t vaccinate their children: A qualitative investigation of australian primary care providers’ experiences. BMC Pediatrics, 17(1), 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-017-0783-2
Giubilini, A. (2021). Vaccination ethics. British Medical Bulletin, 137(1), 4–12. https://doi.org/10.1093/bmb/ldaa036
Mossey, S., Hosman, S., Montgomery, P., & McCauley, K. (2020). Parents’ experiences and nurses’ perceptions of decision-making about childhood immunization. Canadian Journal of Nursing Research, 52(4), 255–267. https://doi.org/10.1177/0844562119847343
A Sample Answer 2 For the Assignment: NURS 6512N Assignment: Ethical Concerns on Assessments
Title: NURS 6512N Assignment: Ethical Concerns on Assessments
The patient is in advanced-stage cancer, and the effective discussion should be on life care and discussion of wishes and needs. In the case presented, the patient has tested positive for advanced-stage cancer and is presented in the emergency unit for cardiac arrest. In this write-up, I will provide a detailed narrative explaining the health assessment information required for a diagnosis regarding the presented case.
I would determine the cardiac arrest using an ECG and the life-saving measures as defined in the ACL protocols (Nelson & Lewis, 2017). Once I am able to stabilize the patient, I would ask the boyfriend if the patient has an advanced directive or will concerning the resuscitation status. The advanced directive is a legal document relaying more information on the life savings of the patient (Rossetti, 2017). In this case, I would ask the boyfriend who can connect to the next of kin in case the boyfriend is not the next of kin. This would happen if the patient is unconscious or does not have the mental capacity to make important decisions. Effective decisions for resuscitation would wait, but until then, I will make every attempt to stabilize the patient.
I will respect the wish of the patient and the family. If the patient and the family agree that they need all interventions and the patient is stable on life support machines, then further investigation into brain function and viability will be conducted (Ozmen et al., 2019). Diagnostic testing would reveal the extent of brain damage and cardiopulmonary stability that would aid in determining the status of my patient and viability. I will then discuss the patient’s condition with the family to get ready for any result that would come from the treatment offered to the patient.
A confirmation that the brain cells of the patient are dead and the family is not ready to stop the life support measures, the hospital can change the status of the patient to “do not resuscitate” with approval from two physicians (Nelson & Lewis, 2017). However, providers will ensure that the family confirms the decision. This would be important in avoiding ethical dilemmas.
References
Nelson, A., & Lewis, A. (2017). Determining brain death: basic approach and controversial issues. American Journal of Critical Care, 26(6), 496-500. https://doi.org/10.4037/ajcc2017540
Ozmen, O., Aksoy, M., Atalay, C., Aydin, M. D., Dostbil, A., Ince, I., & Sener, E. (2019). Are unresponsive dilated pupils an indicator for brain death? an evaluation of Edinger Westphal nucleus in rabbits with brain death. Annals of Medical Research, 26(10), 2376-2381. https://annalsmedres.org/index.php/aomr/article/view/3711
Rossetti, A. O. (2017). Clinical neurophysiology for neurological prognostication of comatose patients after cardiac arrest. Clinical Neurophysiology Practice, 2, 76-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnp.2017.03.001
Grading Rubric
Performance Category | 100% or highest level of performance
100% 16 points |
Very good or high level of performance
88% 14 points |
Acceptable level of performance
81% 13 points |
Inadequate demonstration of expectations
68% 11 points |
Deficient level of performance
56% 9 points
|
Failing level
of performance 55% or less 0 points |
Total Points Possible= 50 | 16 Points | 14 Points | 13 Points | 11 Points | 9 Points | 0 Points |
Scholarliness
Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic topics. |
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three or more of the following elements
|
16 Points | 14 Points | 13 Points | 11 Points | 9 Points | 0 Points | |
Application of Course Knowledge
Demonstrate the ability to analyze and apply principles, knowledge and information learned in the outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations |
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three of the following elements
|
10 Points | 9 Points | 6 Points | 0 Points | |||
Interactive Dialogue
Initial post should be a minimum of 300 words (references do not count toward word count) The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each (references do not count toward word count) Responses are substantive and relate to the topic. |
Demonstrated all of the following:
|
Demonstrated 3 of the following:
|
Demonstrated 2 of the following:
|
Demonstrated 1 or less of the following:
|
||
8 Points | 7 Points | 6 Points | 5 Points | 4 Points | 0 Points | |
Grammar, Syntax, APA
Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing. The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition Error is defined to be a unique APA error. Same type of error is only counted as one error. |
The following was present:
AND
AND
|
The following was present:
AND/OR
AND/OR
|
The following was present:
AND/OR
AND/OR
|
The following was present:
AND/OR
AND/OR
|
The following was present:
AND/OR
AND/OR
AND/OR
|
The following was present:
AND/OR
AND/OR
|
0 Points Deducted | 5 Points Lost | |||||
Participation
Requirements |
Demonstrated the following:
|
Failed to demonstrate the following:
|
||||
0 Points Lost | 5 Points Lost | |||||
Due Date Requirements | Demonstrated all of the following:
A minimum of one peer and one instructor responses are to be posted within the course no later than Sunday, 11:59 pm MT. |
Demonstrates one or less of the following.
A minimum of one peer and one instructor responses are to be posted within the course no later than Sunday, 11:59 pm MT. |