NRS 493 Topic 10 DQ 1 Dissemination of EBP and research

NRS 493 Topic 10 DQ 1 Dissemination of EBP and research

NRS 493 Topic 10 DQ 1 Dissemination of EBP and research

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NRS 493 Topic 10 DQ 1 Dissemination of EBP and research

Topic 10 DQ 1

Jun 20-22, 2022

Dissemination of EBP and research, such as presenting results at a conference or writing an article for a journal, is an important part of professional practice. Identify one professional journal and one nursing or health care conference where you might present your project. Discuss why each of your choices is the best option for you to disseminate your new knowledge.

Sharia Jones

Posted Date

Jun 26, 2022, 5:05 AM

Replies to Sharia Jones

The exchange of innovation provides an outlet to display new processes that can be utilized to allow for much more efficient and practical healthcare to be provided. Nursing journals and healthcare conventions and conferences allow healthcare professionals to spread and disseminate the latest information and knowledge. These publications and professional gatherings empower nurses to improve the quality of service given to the population. Nurse leaders are strategically positioned to ensure data is being used to inform decisions about care delivery and implement strategies aimed at achieving quality and safety outcomes.

If given the opportunity to disseminate the research finding of my Urine culture initiative, I would choose the Journal of Nursing Care Quality (JNCQ). This would be a great option because it is a peer-reviewed journal that provides practicing nurses as well as nurses who have leadership roles in nursing care quality programs with useful information regarding the application of quality principles and concepts in the practice setting. The journal offers a forum for the scholarly discussion of “real world” implementation of quality activities.

 

To disseminate my research findings via healthcare conferences, I would choose the International Conference on Nursing Interventions and Patient Outcomes. This is a good place to showcase my findings because this conference aims to bring together leading academic scientists, researchers, and research scholars to exchange and share their experiences and research results on all aspects of Nursing Interventions and Patient Outcomes. It also provides a premier interdisciplinary platform for researchers, practitioners, and educators to present and discuss the most recent innovations, trends, and concerns as well as practical challenges encountered, and solutions adopted in the fields of Nursing Interventions and Patient Outcomes (Evidence Based Nursing Conferences, 2021).

 

References

 

Evidence-Based Nursing Conferences. (2021). Evidence-Based Nursing Conferences | World Evidence-Based Nursing Conference | Evidence-Based Nursing Congress. https://nursingworldconference.com/program/scientific-sessions/evidence-based-nursing

 

Journal of Nursing and Practice (2022) Top-ranked Journals In USA | Scholars.Direct. https://scholars.direct/journal.php?jid=nursing

Coraline Powell

replied toSharia Jones

Jun 26, 2022, 11:30 PM

  • Replies to Sharia Jones

Hello Sharia,

When considering dissemination options, one piece of advice I gleaned from Morris et al. (2021) is that it is vital to consider the diversity of the dissemination strategies. In order to properly ascertain the extent to which a project will be successful it has to be implemented on a large scale and to a large and diverse population, in order to ensure that all outliers are accounted for. Therefore,  disseminating. the project to an international conference would be ideal as this is bound to have a dives group of personnel and leaders in healthcare, that cater to diverse groups of patients.

References

Morris, H., Jones, R., Tumin, D., Garris, J., Kohler, J. A., Sr, Reeder, T. J., Lazorick, S., Lawson, L. E., & Higginson, J. (2021). Dissemination of Quality Improvement Project Results After Local Presentation. American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality36(6), 395–401. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.JMQ.0000735488.70012.9b

Raimol Joseph

Posted Date

Jun 23, 2022, 10:56 AM

Replies to Sharia Jones

One health conference in which I could present my project is the National Association of Indian Nurses of America (NAINA). One professional journal that I could present my project is The American Journal of Maternal/Child Nursing (MCN). The MCN is the best option for me to disseminate my knowledge because this journal is focused on providing information that is relevant and timely about nursing practice in terms of perinatal, neonatal, midwifery, and pediatric specialties (About the journal, 2022). In terms of my change proposal and presentation, the main topic of discussion is on maternal health and affects of one of the pillars of society known as socioeconomic status affecting health of mothers and babies and how that could be combatted. NAINA is the best option for me to disseminate my new knowledge because it allows my topic’s relevance to being applied to various different ethnicities to also be checked (About Us, 2022). For my personal topic, the focus was on all women and the findings were generalized to women but these findings could also be taken into consideration to find similar patterns in women of Indian descent to prevent illness

About the journal. About the Journal : MCN: The American Journal of Maternal/Child Nursing. (2022). Retrieved June 23, 2022, from https://journals.lww.com/mcnjournal/Pages/aboutthejournal.aspx

About Us. National Association of Indian Nurses of America. (n.d.). Retrieved June 23, 2022, from https://nainausa.org/about-us/

Kerry-Ann Campbell

replied toRaimol Joseph

Jun 23, 2022, 11:44 PM

  • Replies to Raimol Joseph

Hi Raimol,

Maternal and child health has been a top priority across the globe for several years and is considered a vital public health service (Chadra Sahoo, 2021). Hence the development of more evidence-based interventions will help to improve maternal and childhood outcomes. One would totally agree with your choice of The American Journal of Maternal and Child Nursing for the dissemination of evidence-based projects desirous of improving the health disparities affecting the maternal and child health of lower-income communities. If this grave global problem is not addressed with the current best methods then the cycle will continue to replicate.

Another professional journal that you could use to disseminate such a global issue is the International Journal of Maternal and Child

NRS 493 Topic 10 DQ 1 Dissemination of EBP and research
NRS 493 Topic 10 DQ 1 Dissemination of EBP and research

Health (MCH) and AIDS (IJMA). The IJMA is a multidisciplinary peer-reviewed open-access journal that focuses on the social determinants of health, diseases, and disparities affecting the MCH population (IJMA, 2022).

Reference

Chandra Sahoo, K., Negi, S., Patel, K., Mishra, B., Kumar Palo, S., & Pati, S. (2021). Challenges in Maternal and Child Health Services Delivery and Access during Pandemics or Public Health Disasters in Low-and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review. In NCBI. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8306470/

 

IJMA, . (2022, March 6). ABOUT THE JOURNAL. In International Journal of Maternal and Childhealth and AIDS. Retrieved from https://www.mchandaids.org/index.php/IJMA

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NRS 493 Topic 10 DQ 1 Dissemination of EBP and research

Grading Rubric Guidelines

Performance Category 10 9 8 4 0
Scholarliness

Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic decisions.

  • Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry clearly stating how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions
  • Evaluates literature resources to develop a comprehensive analysis or synthesis.
  • Uses valid, relevant, and reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion
  • Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry but does not clearly state how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
  • Evaluates information from source(s) to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis.
  • Uses some valid, relevant, reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion.
  • Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
  • Information is taken from source(s) with some interpretation/evaluation, but not enough to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis.
  • Little valid, relevant, or reliable outside sources are used to contribute to the threaded discussion.
  • Demonstrates little or no understanding of the topic.
  • Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
  • Information is taken from source(s) without any interpretation/evaluation.
  • The posting uses information that is not valid, relevant, or reliable
  • No evidence of the use of scholarly inquiry to inform or change professional or academic decisions.
  • Information is not valid, relevant, or reliable
Performance Category  10 9 8 4 0
Application of Course Knowledge –

Demonstrate the ability to analyze, synthesize, and/or apply principles and concepts learned in the course lesson and outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations

  • Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources;
  • Applies concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life.
  • Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources.
  • Applies concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
  • Interactions with classmates are relevant to the discussion topic but do not make direct reference to lesson content
  • Posts are generally on topic but do not build knowledge by incorporating concepts and principles from the lesson.
  • Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
  • Does not demonstrate a solid understanding of the principles and concepts presented in the lesson
  • Posts do not adequately address the question posed either by the discussion prompt or the instructor’s launch post.
  • Posts are superficial and do not reflect an understanding of the lesson content
  • Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
  • Posts are not related to the topics provided by the discussion prompt or by the instructor; attempts by the instructor to redirect the student are ignored
  • No discussion of lesson concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life
Performance Category  5 4 3 2 0
Interactive Dialogue

Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days.

(5 points possible per graded thread)

  • Exceeds minimum post requirements
  • Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts three or more times in each graded thread, over three separate days.
  • Replies to a post posed by faculty and to a peer
  • Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week.
  • Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days
  • Replies to a question posed by a peer

Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week.

  • Meets expectations of 2 posts on 2 different days.
  • The main post is not made by the Wednesday deadline
  • Does not reply to a question posed by a peer or faculty
  • Has only one post for the week
  • Discussion posts contain few, if any, new ideas or applications; often are a rehashing or summary of other students’ comments
  • Does not post to the thread
  • No connections are made to the topic
  Minus 1 Point Minus 2 Point Minus 3 Point Minus 4 Point Minus 5 Point
Grammar, Syntax, APA

Note: if there are only a few errors in these criteria, please note this for the student in as an area for improvement. If the student does not make the needed corrections in upcoming weeks, then points should be deducted.

Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing.

The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition

  • 2-3 errors in APA format.
  • Written responses have 2-3 grammatical, spelling, and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is generally clear, focused, and facilitates communication.
  • 4-5 errors in APA format.
  • Writing responses have 4-5 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is somewhat focused.
  • 6-7 errors in APA format.
  • Writing responses have 6-7 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is slightly focused making discussion difficult to understand.
  • 8-10 errors in APA format.
  • Writing responses have 8-10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is not focused, making discussion difficult to understand.
  • Post contains greater than 10 errors in APA format.
  • Written responses have more than 10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style does not facilitate communication.
  • The student continues to make repeated mistakes in any of the above areas after written correction by the instructor
0 points lost       -5 points lost
Total Participation Requirements

per discussion thread

The student answers the threaded discussion question or topic on one day and posts a second response on another day. The student does not meet the minimum requirement of two postings on two different days
Early Participation Requirement

per discussion thread

The student must provide a substantive answer to the graded discussion question(s) or topic(s), posted by the course instructor (not a response to a peer), by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT of each week. The student does not meet the requirement of a substantive response to the stated question or topic by Wednesday at 11:59 pm MT.

Check Out Also: NRS 493 Topic 9 DQ 2 Sustaining change can be difficult, as there are many variables that can affect implementation