NURS 6053 Discussion 2: The Leadership Profile

Sample Answer for NURS 6053 Discussion 2: The Leadership Profile Included After Question

Do you believe you have the traits to be an effective leader? Perhaps you are already in a supervisory role, but as has been discussed previously, appointment does not guarantee leadership skills.

How can you evaluate your own leadership skills and behaviors? You can start by analyzing your performance in specific areas of leadership. In this Discussion, you will complete Gallup’s StrengthsFinder assessment. This assessment will identify your personal strengths, which have been shown to improve motivation, engagement, and academic self-conference. Through this assessment, you will discover your top five themes—which you can reflect upon and use to leverage your talents for optimal success and examine how the results relate to your leadership traits.

RESOURCES

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

WEEKLY RESOURCES

To Prepare:

Complete the StrengthsFinder assessment instrument, per the instructions found in this Module’s Learning Resources.

Please Note: This Assessment will take roughly 30 minutes to complete.

  • Once you have completed your assessment, you will receive your “Top 5 Signature Themes of Talent”on your screen.
  • Click the Downloadbutton below Signature Theme Report, and then print and save the report. We also encourage you to select the Apply tab to review action items.

NOTE: Please keep your report. You will need your results for future courses. Technical Issues with Gallup:

If you have technical issues after registering, please contact the Gallup Education Support group by phone at +1.866-346-4408. Support is available 24 hours/day from 6:00 p.m. Sunday U.S. Central Time through 5:00 p.m. Friday U.S. Central Time.

  • Reflect on the results of your Assessment, and consider how the results relate to your leadership traits.
  • Download your Signature Theme Report to submit for this Discussion.

BY DAY 3 OF WEEK 5

Post a brief description of your results from the StrengthsFinder assessment. Then, briefly describe two core values, two strengths, and two characteristics that you would like to strengthen based on the results of your StrengthsFinder assessment. Be specific. Note: Be sure to attach your Signature Theme Report to your Discussion post.

BY DAY 6 OF WEEK 5

Respond to at least two of your colleagues on two different days by making recommendations for how they might strengthen the leadership behaviors profiled in their StrengthsFinder assessment, or by commenting on lessons to be learned from the results that can be applied to personal leadership philosophies and behaviors.

A Sample Answer For the Assignment: NURS 6053 Discussion 2: The Leadership Profile

Title: NURS 6053 Discussion 2: The Leadership Profile

Although appointment to a position does not automatically guarantee good leadership, I believe I have effective traits for a good leader. Leadership behavior is the process that a leader uses to guide and influence the work of others to meet organizational objectives (Ahlquist, 2017). The skills are used as motivation for staff to achieve the vision and mission of an organization. This paper identifies personal leadership, strengths and weaknesses, and its application for motivational engagement. 

Decision-making is a primary and core function of a leader. Assume a confident and assertive style of leadership. The staff or employee should have faith and trust in the decisions that the leader makes. The best approach is leading by example (Seemiller, 2017). If you need your employees to reach a certain level of achievement, then as the leader, be able to reach that level too. If you require your staff to stay up too late on work, then as the leader, be able to stay up late with the others as you motivate them. 

According to the top 5 signature themes of talent by assessment, it shows that analytical, strategic, adaptable, approachable, and achiever. This shows that there is consistency in the signature themes of talent. Moreover, there are 2 core values that I need to consider and improve. Honesty and consistency in decision-making are the most influential values (Yee et al, 2018).You also need to develop trust from the employee. 

Some strengths need to be improved. A developer is a person who brings out the best from others. They cultivate small efforts of improvement and eventually turn them into superpowers in their career. An empathetic leader feels so sorry for the employer and sees the world through your own eyes. Therefore, developing the qualities of a developer and empathy are core to best leadership (Sessa, 2017). 

Leadership development is a learning process in career progression. An effective leader should motivate other ad show interest in achieving the objective of the organization. Additionally, there are strengths and weaknesses of a leader. The leader should work on improving the weaknesses and cultivating the strengths for the best performance.

NURS 6053 Discussion 2 The Leadership Profile
NURS 6053 Discussion 2 The Leadership Profile

 

References 

Ahlquist, J. (2017). Digital student leadership development. New Directions for Student Leadership, 2017(153), 47-62. https://doi.org/10.1002/yd.20229 

Seemiller, C. (2017). Using leadership competencies to develop talents into strengths. New Directions for Student Leadership, 2017(156), 31-42. https://doi.org/10.1002/yd.20269 

Sessa, V. I. (2017). Leadership courses and formal leadership development programs as key leadership learning events. College Student Leadership Development, 143-154. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315674322-8 

Yee, G. C., Janke, K. K., Fuller, P. D., Kelley, K. A., Scott, S. A., & Sorensen, T. D. (2018). StrengthsFinder ® signature themes of talent in pharmacy residents at four midwestern pharmacy schools. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 10(1), 61-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2017.09.002 

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NURS 6053 Discussion 2: The Leadership Profile

A Sample Answer 2 For the Assignment: NURS 6053 Discussion 2: The Leadership Profile

Title: NURS 6053 Discussion 2: The Leadership Profile

It is true that self-reflection is imperative to understand oneself if the goal is to help others build upon their strengths. The reflection process allows an individual to revisit the past. The experience informs the future and critical decision-making process related to the future. Leaders can also reflect on their leadership roles and performances. Self-reflection creates room for improvement in the future since the information from the past shapes future leadership choices (Reljić et al., 2019). The Clifton Strength Finder 2.0 is among the suitable self-reflection tools for professionals in different fields. The tool provides detailed information on leadership strengths and weaknesses. Learner, achiever, input, self-assurance, and connectedness are some of the themes for self-reflection in the Clifton Strength Finder 2.0. Leaders who double-up as achievers have a desire to boast organizational performance (Ellis, 2021). Therefore, these healthcare leaders are responsible for creating an environment that will guarantee them the desired goals. Besides, achievers inspire their followers to attain the shared outcome.

References

Ellis, P. (2021). Leadership, management and team working in nursing. Leadership, Management and Team Working in Nursing, 1-100.

Reljić, N. M., Pajnkihar, M., & Fekonja, Z. (2019). Self-reflection during first clinical practice: The experiences of nursing students. Nurse education today, 72, 61-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2018.10.019Links to an external site.

A Sample Answer 3 For the Assignment: NURS 6053 Discussion 2: The Leadership Profile

Title: NURS 6053 Discussion 2: The Leadership Profile

Healthcare is a people business with leadership that brings everyone together, creating an environment bringing all the various skill sets together to drive the organization forward. Within the healthcare industry, leaders are expected to play a significant role in the decision-making process. With access to data, the financial gain can be used to provide training and support employees’ development, which will safeguard against external setbacks (Duggan et al., 2015).

Best leaders are people who know what they are doing. They see things that need change and act with focus, energy, and direction (Walden University 2014). This discussion on evaluating one’s leadership skills and behaviors allowed me to complete Gallup’s Strengths Finder assessment and discover my top five themes Responsibility, Learner, Achiever, Belief, and Arranger (Rath 2017). The results reflect my personality and prompt me to leverage my talents for success. People need to recognize their skills, and personal assessments can be instrumental in reflecting on what is important to them to meet their leadership skills and feel accomplished.

Core values, Strengths, and characteristics

Belief and Arranger talents for strength are essential to excellence. Being happy with a good team getting my energy from my sense of mission and purpose, listening closely to hear others’ values connecting with people by beliefs, I can offer my natural insight into organization and arrangements to keep a group project moving towards its goal. Possessing the Responsible trait, I would need to strengthen this in my leadership role as I could take on more than I can handle; I must learn to manage this talent by deciding what I must stop doing if I take on a new responsibility. Also, being a learner indicates my love for learning and that the outcome may not matter to me, which could result in unfinished projects. However, having Achiever as a trait is reassuring that my learner trait can make me more productive and purposeful. It explains how I feel fulfilled by meeting my daily goals and bringing meaning to life. Gallup (n.d.) suggests defining my beliefs in more positive ways focusing on what I am for rather than what I am against, will help me be perceived positively, so I would like to brush up on being focused and be an influencer which is essential to influence others within the team to make my talents productive and purposeful. However, the main principle of leadership remains to influence people to accomplish goals through vision, communication, and motivation with values of honesty, loyalty, and fairness (Ghorbani et al., 2023).

Conclusion

Self-reflecting tools are essential to understand one’s skills in collecting qualitative and quantitative information on one’s leadership styles. Broom & Marshall (2021) summarize how self-motivated individuals can make decisions to accomplish set goals. Every individual is different. We, as nurse leaders, learn how to be transformational leaders making changes to healthcare in the future and for generations to come (Broome & Marshall, 2021). Furthermore, evidence-based decision-making incorporates the best available research evidence, the healthcare professional’s experience, and the need and preference of the community (Duggan et al., 2015).

References

Broome, M., & Marshall, E. S. (2021). Transformational leadership in nursing: From expert clinician to influential leader (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Springer.

Duggan, K., Aisaka, K., Tabak, R. G., Smith, C., Erwin, P., & Brownson, R. C. (2015). Implementing administrative evidence-based practices: Lessons from the field in six local health departments across the United States. BMC Health Services Research, 15Links to an external site.(1). doi:10.1186/s12913-015-0891-3.  https://bmchealthservres.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12913-015-0891-3Links to an external site.

Ghorbani, A., Mohammadi, N., Rooddehghan, Z., Bakhshi, F., & Nasrabadi, A. N. (2023). Transformational leadership in the development of transformative education in nursing: a qualitative study. BMC Nursing, 22(1), 1–10.

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-022-01154-zLinks to an external site.Links to an external site.

Rath, T. (2007). Strengths Finder 2.0 – with Access Code.

Walden University, LLC (Producer) (2014). Leadership

. Baltimore, MD: Author.

Rubric Guidelines DQ

Performance Category 10 9 8 4 0
Scholarliness

Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic decisions.
  • Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry clearly stating how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions
  • Evaluates literature resources to develop a comprehensive analysis or synthesis.
  • Uses valid, relevant, and reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion
  • Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry but does not clearly state how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
  • Evaluates information from source(s) to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis.
  • Uses some valid, relevant, reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion.
  • Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
  • Information is taken from source(s) with some interpretation/evaluation, but not enough to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis.
  • Little valid, relevant, or reliable outside sources are used to contribute to the threaded discussion.
  • Demonstrates little or no understanding of the topic.
  • Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
  • Information is taken from source(s) without any interpretation/evaluation.
  • The posting uses information that is not valid, relevant, or reliable
  • No evidence of the use of scholarly inquiry to inform or change professional or academic decisions.
  • Information is not valid, relevant, or reliable
Performance Category  10 9 8 4 0
Application of Course Knowledge –

Demonstrate the ability to analyze, synthesize, and/or apply principles and concepts learned in the course lesson and outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations
  • Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources;
  • Applies concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life.
  • Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources.
  • Applies concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
  • Interactions with classmates are relevant to the discussion topic but do not make direct reference to lesson content
  • Posts are generally on topic but do not build knowledge by incorporating concepts and principles from the lesson.
  • Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
  • Does not demonstrate a solid understanding of the principles and concepts presented in the lesson
  • Posts do not adequately address the question posed either by the discussion prompt or the instructor’s launch post.
  • Posts are superficial and do not reflect an understanding of the lesson content
  • Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
  • Posts are not related to the topics provided by the discussion prompt or by the instructor; attempts by the instructor to redirect the student are ignored
  • No discussion of lesson concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life
Performance Category  5 4 3 2 0
Interactive Dialogue

Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days.

(5 points possible per graded thread)
  • Exceeds minimum post requirements
  • Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts three or more times in each graded thread, over three separate days.
  • Replies to a post posed by faculty and to a peer
  • Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week.
  • Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days
  • Replies to a question posed by a peer

Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week.
  • Meets expectations of 2 posts on 2 different days.
  • The main post is not made by the Wednesday deadline
  • Does not reply to a question posed by a peer or faculty
  • Has only one post for the week
  • Discussion posts contain few, if any, new ideas or applications; often are a rehashing or summary of other students’ comments
  • Does not post to the thread
  • No connections are made to the topic
  Minus 1 Point Minus 2 Point Minus 3 Point Minus 4 Point Minus 5 Point
Grammar, Syntax, APA

Note: if there are only a few errors in these criteria, please note this for the student in as an area for improvement. If the student does not make the needed corrections in upcoming weeks, then points should be deducted.

Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing.

The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition
  • 2-3 errors in APA format.
  • Written responses have 2-3 grammatical, spelling, and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is generally clear, focused, and facilitates communication.
  • 4-5 errors in APA format.
  • Writing responses have 4-5 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is somewhat focused.
  • 6-7 errors in APA format.
  • Writing responses have 6-7 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is slightly focused making discussion difficult to understand.
  • 8-10 errors in APA format.
  • Writing responses have 8-10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is not focused, making discussion difficult to understand.
  • Post contains greater than 10 errors in APA format.
  • Written responses have more than 10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style does not facilitate communication.
  • The student continues to make repeated mistakes in any of the above areas after written correction by the instructor
0 points lost       -5 points lost
Total Participation Requirements

per discussion thread

 The student answers the threaded discussion question or topic on one day and posts a second response on another day. The student does not meet the minimum requirement of two postings on two different days
Early Participation Requirement

per discussion thread

 The student must provide a substantive answer to the graded discussion question(s) or topic(s), posted by the course instructor (not a response to a peer), by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT of each week. The student does not meet the requirement of a substantive response to the stated question or topic by Wednesday at 11:59 pm MT.