NR 501 Week 3 Discussion DQ 1 Steps of Concept Analysis Recent

Sample Answer for NR 501 Week 3 Discussion DQ 1 Steps of Concept Analysis Recent Included After Question

Select a nursing concept (be sure to use a nursing theory) and then provide a response to each one of the steps included in a concept analysis regarding your selected concept. This information does not have to be comprehensive but provides a foundation to the upcoming assignment. Be sure to include a scholarly reference.

A Sample Answer For the Assignment: NR 501 Week 3 Discussion DQ 1 Steps of Concept Analysis Recent

Title: NR 501 Week 3 Discussion DQ 1 Steps of Concept Analysis Recent

Definition/Explanation of the selected nursing concept:

The selected nursing concept for this analysis is compassion. Compassion is a durable concept that is largely used in nursing and healthcare. It has behavioral and emotional elements that influence the actions of nurses in their practice. Compassion is among the crucial elements and determinants of quality nursing care. Compassion has several definitions. For example, the Oxford dictionary defines it as sympathetic concern and pity for one’s suffering. The term also refers to the empathizing with a person who is suffering or harmed. It also refers to the feeling of being aware of another person’s suffering coupled with the intention to help them overcome the suffering (Tierney et al., 2019; Younas & Maddigan, 2019). Other authors have also defined it as a basic human kindness with deep awareness of others suffering coupled with the effort or wish to relieve it (Tierney et al., 2019).

Three defining attributes:

Compassion has several attributes. They include the authentic presence, noticing sufferings of others, and showing empathy towards the suffering. It is also the connectedness that nurses have with the suffering, engaging emotionally with others, and being motivated to assist or support others overcome their challenges. Compassion also has the attribute of seeking to empower the vulnerable to overcome their health problems, negotiating how to prevent or alleviate suffering, and using knowledge and skills to prevent, alleviate, or manage distress or suffering (Galetz, 2019).

1 Antecedent and 1 Consequence of the concept:

One antecedent of compassion is respect. Nurses must demonstrate respect to others for them to understand their sufferings or experiences. The respect helps them to understand the problem from the patient’s perspective and how to address it better. Respect also helps nurses to identify ethical practices that they can use to enhance the patient outcomes (Younas & Maddigan, 2019).

One consequence of compassion is trust between patient and the nurse. Compassionate care increases the trust that patients have towards the care given by the nurses. It also strengthens the professional relationship among them, which result in additional outcomes such as patient satisfaction, empowerment, and adherence to treatment plans. The strengthened trust also eliminates or reduces fear that patients could have towards healthcare systems and interventions (Younas & Maddigan, 2019). Therefore, patients are empowered to take responsibility for their health, hence, the realization of optimum outcomes in the care process.

Model Case:

A model case of compassion is a nurse involved in the care of a patient with terminal illness. The nurse must implement patient-centered interventions to promote peaceful death in such a patient. In this case, the nurse must demonstrate compassion by understanding the unique experiences of the patient, his or her sufferings, and attempt to implement interventions to minimize them. For example, the nurse administers analgesics to minimize pain in end of life care for patient’s psychological comfort and wellbeing.

Theoretical Applications of the Concept:

Dorothea Orem’s theory of self-care utilizes the concept of compassion. Accordingly, nurses must understand the experiences of their patients for them to assist the patients meet their needs. For example, nurses caring for a cancer patient understand the chronic pain that patients experience and implement interventions to reduce their suffering (Tierney et al., 2019).

Reflection:

I always apply the concept of compassion in my nursing practice. I always strive to understand what a disease means to the patient and explore evidence-based interventions to enhance treatment outcomes. I also go an extra mile to see that the additional factors that do not relate to the disease are addressed for optimum recovery. I also apply compassion by ensuring that the decisions that I make do not predispose patients to any unintended harm. Therefore, compassion is part of my professional practice.

NR 501 Week 3 Discussion DQ 1 Steps of Concept Analysis Recent References

Galetz, E. (2019). The empathy-compassion matrix: Using a comparison concept analysis to identify care components. Nursing Forum, 54(3), 448–454. https://doi.org/10.1111/nuf.12353

Tierney, S., Bivins, R., & Seers, K. (2019). Compassion in nursing: Solution or stereotype? Nursing Inquiry, 26(1), e12271. https://doi.org/10.1111/nin.12271

Younas, A., & Maddigan, J. (2019). Proposing a policy framework for nursing education for fostering compassion in nursing students: A critical review. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 75(8), 1621–1636. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13946

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NR 501 Week 3 Discussion DQ 1 Steps of Concept Analysis Recent

NR 501 Week 3 Discussion DQ 1 Steps of Concept Analysis Recent Grading Rubric Guidelines

Performance Category	10	9	8	4	0
Scholarliness Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic decisions.	Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry clearly stating how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions Evaluates literature resources to develop a comprehensive analysis or synthesis. Uses valid, relevant, and reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion	Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry but does not clearly state how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions. Evaluates information from source(s) to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis. Uses some valid, relevant, reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion.	Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions. Information is taken from source(s) with some interpretation/evaluation, but not enough to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis. Little valid, relevant, or reliable outside sources are used to contribute to the threaded discussion. Demonstrates little or no understanding of the topic.	Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions. Information is taken from source(s) without any interpretation/evaluation. The posting uses information that is not valid, relevant, or reliable	No evidence of the use of scholarly inquiry to inform or change professional or academic decisions. Information is not valid, relevant, or reliable
Performance Category	10	9	8	4	0
Application of Course Knowledge – Demonstrate the ability to analyze, synthesize, and/or apply principles and concepts learned in the course lesson and outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations	Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources; Applies concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life.	Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources. Applies concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life Interactions with classmates are relevant to the discussion topic but do not make direct reference to lesson content	Posts are generally on topic but do not build knowledge by incorporating concepts and principles from the lesson. Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life Does not demonstrate a solid understanding of the principles and concepts presented in the lesson	Posts do not adequately address the question posed either by the discussion prompt or the instructor’s launch post. Posts are superficial and do not reflect an understanding of the lesson content Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life	Posts are not related to the topics provided by the discussion prompt or by the instructor; attempts by the instructor to redirect the student are ignored No discussion of lesson concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life
Performance Category	5	4	3	2	0
Interactive Dialogue Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days. *(5 points possible per graded thread)*	Exceeds minimum post requirements Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts three or more times in each graded thread, over three separate days. Replies to a post posed by faculty and to a peer Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week.	Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days Replies to a question posed by a peer Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week.	Meets expectations of 2 posts on 2 different days. The main post is not made by the Wednesday deadline Does not reply to a question posed by a peer or faculty	Has only one post for the week Discussion posts contain few, if any, new ideas or applications; often are a rehashing or summary of other students’ comments	Does not post to the thread No connections are made to the topic
	Minus 1 Point	Minus 2 Point	Minus 3 Point	Minus 4 Point	Minus 5 Point
Grammar, Syntax, APA Note: if there are only a few errors in these criteria, please note this for the student in as an area for improvement. If the student does not make the needed corrections in upcoming weeks, then points should be deducted. Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing. The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition	2-3 errors in APA format. Written responses have 2-3 grammatical, spelling, and punctuation errors. Writing style is generally clear, focused, and facilitates communication.	4-5 errors in APA format. Writing responses have 4-5 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors. Writing style is somewhat focused.	6-7 errors in APA format. Writing responses have 6-7 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors. Writing style is slightly focused making discussion difficult to understand.	8-10 errors in APA format. Writing responses have 8-10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors. Writing style is not focused, making discussion difficult to understand.	Post contains greater than 10 errors in APA format. Written responses have more than 10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors. Writing style does not facilitate communication. The student continues to make repeated mistakes in any of the above areas after written correction by the instructor
	0 points lost				-5 points lost
Total Participation Requirements *per discussion thread*	The student answers the threaded discussion question or topic on one day and posts a second response on another day.				The student does not meet the minimum requirement of two postings on two different days
Early Participation Requirement *per discussion thread*	The student must provide a substantive answer to the graded discussion question(s) or topic(s), posted by the course instructor (not a response to a peer), by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT of each week.				The student does not meet the requirement of a substantive response to the stated question or topic by Wednesday at 11:59 pm MT.

Also Read: NR 501 Week 2 Importance of Theory Paper Assignment – Application of Pender’s Health Promotion Model Recent