Boost your Grades with us today!
CAPSTONE CHANGE PROJECT EVALUATION PLAN NRS 493
CAPSTONE CHANGE PROJECT EVALUATION PLAN NRS 493
Published
Assessment Description
Review your strategic plan to implement the change proposal, the objectives, the outcomes, and listed resources. Develop a process to evaluate the intervention if it were implemented. Write a 150-250 word summary of the evaluation plan that will be used to evaluate your intervention.
The assignment will be used to develop a written implementation plan.
APA style is not required, but solid academic writing is expected.
You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.
Lopes Activity Tracker
Start Date
May 30, 2022, 12:00 AM
Due Date
Jun 5, 2022, 11:59 PM
Points
10
Status
Published
Assessment Description
Document your clinical practice hours using the Lopes Activity Tracker (LAT) in your student portal. Once you have opened the app, click on the link for your class to record your hours. Clinical practice hours should be documented and submitted within 48 hours of the clinical experience. After the hours have been submitted, the preceptor will verify the hours, which are then reviewed by the faculty.
Download the electronic summary of your practicum experience from the Lopes Activity Tracker. Save the file and submit it though the assignment dropbox for faculty approval.
This report is to be submitted in every topic.
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: CAPSTONE CHANGE PROJECT EVALUATION PLAN NRS 493
Topic 1 DQ 1
Apr 18-20, 2022
Identify two GCU Library scholarly databases that will help you find the best research articles to support your capstone project change proposal. Discuss why these two databases are better than Google Scholar or a general Internet search.
Stacy Moore
Posted Date
Apr 21, 2022, 2:16 PM
Replies to Stacy Moore
Throughout the RN to BSN curriculum and the weekly paper writing assignments, I have discovered that there are several approaches to study evidence-based publications and journals. GCU Library and CINAHL Complete are the two sites that I have found to be the most useful for me, and I have utilized both sites for all of my courses, in addition to the Cochrane Library and Google Scholar, as well as other resources. I believe CINAHL to be more user-friendly than Cochrane, which has six databases of material to browse through. When it comes to information, the GCU library boasts a plethora of resources, including over 92 databases and more than 70,000 full-text publications that are nicely arranged (GCU,2018). As a student, I have discovered that GCU and CINAHL provide a range of publications on health care peer reviews and case studies, which I have found to be really useful in finishing projects. Overall, I believe that every website has advantages and disadvantages depending on what you are searching for and whether or not you can access the information. However, the disadvantage I see with Google Scholar is that most complete texts are not free, and you may have to pay for the information you need. Additionally, the sources of the information you need may not be readily evident, even when you are reading scholarly academic peer review publications. However, I believe that having a large number of options is a positive development.
Resources:
CINAHL Complete Website: https://web-p-ebscohost-com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/ehost/search/advanced?vid=0&sid=be274646-2013-427b-ba71-c09828066ef9%40redis
Grand Canyon University Library (n.d.). Find Journal by Title. In Grand Canyon University Library. Retrieved from https://libguides.gcu.edu/az.php?a=
Thank you for your educational post. To add to your post, CINAHL is the most comprehensive database of nursing and allied health literature available. Nursing journals and publications from the National League for Nursing and the American Nurses Association are accessible via CINAHL. Full-text for nursing and allied journals can be accessed through CINAHL making it safer and reliable for research and evidenced-based projects because it has been peer-reviewed, clinically tried and you easily limit your search to make sure the result fits the research topic you are looking for. It also helps you find journals published by a nurse within 2 years. CINAHL and any other database are better than google because you may be requested to pay for the full text of an article if you search for it on Google or Yahoo. However, there is no fee for using the library databases. Even if you locate an item they don’t have full-text access to via their databases, you may obtain it through an interlibrary loan, which is free of charge.
CINAHL database | EBSCO. (n.d.). EBSCO Information Services, Inc. | www.ebsco.com. https://www.ebsco.com/products/research-databases/cinahl-database#block-cog-ebsco-main-menu
Thank you Stacy for your comprehensive discussion on scholarly databases for use provided by the GCU library. The GCU library has several databases that one can leverage to conduct their research and get evidence-based practice articles for the capstone project (GCU, n.d). As you mention, the CINAHL Complete is a database that one can use to get resources because it offers full text articles and peer-reviewed journal articles with researched evidence for utilization when doing capstone projects. As you mention, all these databases are user-centered and friendly (EBSCO, 2022). The databases boast of a vast amount of resources that include over 60,000 full-text publications and works that are arranged in an orderly and chronological manner for easy access, use, and referencing. These databases have their merits and demerits compared to Google Scholar in various aspects. For instance, the full text articles come with complete citations compared to Google Scholar that does not offer correct references with DOIs. Despite the advantages that the databases offer, it is essential to still leverage Google Scholar where necessary.
CAPSTONE CHANGE PROJECT EVALUATION PLAN NRS 493 References
EBSCO. (2022). CINAHL Database.
https://www.ebsco.com/products/research-databases/cinahl-database
Grand Canyon University Library (n.d.). Find Journal by Title. In Grand Canyon University
Library. https://libguides.gcu.edu/az.php?a=
CAPSTONE CHANGE PROJECT EVALUATION PLAN NRS 493 Grading Rubric
Performance Category | 100% or highest level of performance
100% 16 points |
Very good or high level of performance
88% 14 points |
Acceptable level of performance
81% 13 points |
Inadequate demonstration of expectations
68% 11 points |
Deficient level of performance
56% 9 points
|
Failing level
of performance 55% or less 0 points |
Total Points Possible= 50 | 16 Points | 14 Points | 13 Points | 11 Points | 9 Points | 0 Points |
Scholarliness
Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic topics. |
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three or more of the following elements
|
16 Points | 14 Points | 13 Points | 11 Points | 9 Points | 0 Points | |
Application of Course Knowledge
Demonstrate the ability to analyze and apply principles, knowledge and information learned in the outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations |
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three of the following elements
|
10 Points | 9 Points | 6 Points | 0 Points | |||
Interactive Dialogue
Initial post should be a minimum of 300 words (references do not count toward word count) The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each (references do not count toward word count) Responses are substantive and relate to the topic. |
Demonstrated all of the following:
|
Demonstrated 3 of the following:
|
Demonstrated 2 of the following:
|
Demonstrated 1 or less of the following:
|
||
8 Points | 7 Points | 6 Points | 5 Points | 4 Points | 0 Points | |
Grammar, Syntax, APA
Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing. The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition Error is defined to be a unique APA error. Same type of error is only counted as one error. |
The following was present:
AND
AND
|
The following was present:
AND/OR
AND/OR
|
The following was present:
AND/OR
AND/OR
|
The following was present:
AND/OR
AND/OR
|
The following was present:
AND/OR
AND/OR
AND/OR
|
The following was present:
AND/OR
AND/OR
|
0 Points Deducted | 5 Points Lost | |||||
Participation
Requirements |
Demonstrated the following:
|
Failed to demonstrate the following:
|
||||
0 Points Lost | 5 Points Lost | |||||
Due Date Requirements | Demonstrated all of the following:
A minimum of one peer and one instructor responses are to be posted within the course no later than Sunday, 11:59 pm MT. |
Demonstrates one or less of the following.
A minimum of one peer and one instructor responses are to be posted within the course no later than Sunday, 11:59 pm MT. |