NRSG 314 Unit 4 Discussion Board
NRSG 314 Unit 4 Discussion Board
Sentinel Policies and Procedures
My health facility is accredited by the Joint Commission and thus, it follows the regulations and standards set by the agency and other regulatory bodies. For instance, the health organization has its own sentinel policy and procedures that define sentinel events and outlines the steps to take when such an event occurs. The first item in the organization’s policy is reporting sentinel events. The Joint Commission requires health facilities to report such events; however, it is not mandatory (The Joint Commission, 2022). Secondly, when an event occurs, the policy recommends that a team consisting of a physician, charge nurse, and other appointed practitioners respond to the patient to stabilize the situation and provide a report. The team should also inform the patient and his/her and provide the necessary support, which is consistent with the regulatory requirements of The Joint Commission. Similarly, the organization outlines the procedure for conducting analysis and reporting the event to the Joint Commission as per the agency’s requirements. Another element of the policy consistent with the regulations of the Joint Commission is developing an action plan to prevent future occurrences.
Importance of Regulation by Agencies
The regulating agencies such as the Joint Commission have an important role in providing standards, policies and procedures, which
ensures that organizations maintain safety and quality standards. Through these policies and procedures, the Joint Commission supports organizations to implement quality improvement and patient safety measures, contributing to care excellence (Inomata et al., 2018). The strategies provided by the Joint Commission help organizations to maintain continuous quality improvement, which in return reduces the risk of errors or underperformance (Ibrahim et al., 2022). Ultimately, organizations manage to attain and continue to improve quality measures used to measure the performance quality of a health organization and required for reimbursement purposes.
NRSG 314 Unit 4 Discussion Board References
Ibrahim, S., Reynolds, K., Poon, E., & Alam, M. (2022). The evidence base for US joint commission hospital accreditation standards: cross sectional study. BMJ, 377:e063064. https://doi.10.1136/bmj-2020-063064.
Inomata, T., Mizuno, J., Iwagami, M., Kawasaki, S., Shimada, A., Inada, E., . . . Amano, A. (2018). The impact of Joint Commission International accreditation on time periods in the operating room: A retrospective observational study. PLoS One. , 13(9),e0204301. https://doi.10.1371/journal.pone.0204301.
The Joint Commission . (2022). Sentinel Event Policy and Procedures. Retrieved from The Joint Commission: https://www.jointcommission.org/resources/patient-safety-topics/sentinel-event/sentinel-event-policy-and-procedures/
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NRSG 314 Unit 4 Discussion Board
Primary Task Response: Within the Discussion Board area, write 250 words that respond to the following questions with your thoughts, ideas, and comments. This will be the foundation for future discussions by your classmates. You are required to use 1 scholarly resource, in addition to your textbook. Be substantive and clear, and use examples to reinforce your ideas.
Go to the Joint Commission Web site, and review sentinel event policy and procedures. Discuss the following:
- Review your clinical setting’s policy on sentinel events. How does it compare to the Joint Commission’s regulations?
- Why do you think it is important to have the Joint Commission or other regulating agencies provide policies and procedures?
Responses to Other Students: Respond to at least 2 of your fellow classmates with at least a 100-word reply about their Primary Task Response regarding items you found to be compelling and enlightening. To help you with your discussion, please consider the following questions:
- What did you learn from your classmate’s posting?
- What additional questions do you have after reading the posting?
- What clarification do you need regarding the posting?
- What differences or similarities do you see between your posting and other classmates’ postings?
NRSG 314 Unit 4 Discussion Board Rubric
The Discussion Board Grading Rubric is a scoring tool that represents the performance expectations for the discussion. This grading rubric is divided into components that provide a clear description of what should be included within each component of the discussion. It is the road map that can help lead your discussion. Discussion Board Grading Rubric
For assistance with your assignment, please use your text, Web resources, and all course materials.
NRSG 314 Unit 4 Discussion Board Reference
The Joint Commission. (2019, August 8). Sentinel event policy and procedures. Retrieved from http://www.jointcommission.org/sentinel_event_policy_and_procedures/
| Discussion Board Rubric | ||||||||||
| Expectation | Weight | % Score Earned | Comments | |||||||
| Support From Literature: Support from current literature (less than 5 years old) is present and includes a minimum of one scholarly in-text citation and matching reference for each topic. | 20% | 20% | ||||||||
| Application of Course Knowledge: Post contributes unique perspectives or insights gleaned from personal experience or examples from healthcare field. | 30% | 30% | ||||||||
| Organization: Post presents information in logical, meaningful, and understandable sequence, clearly relevant to discussion topic. | 20% | 20% | ||||||||
| Interactive Dialogue: Responds substantively to two posts from student peers that are topic-related. A substantive post adds content or insights or asks a question that will add to the learning experience and/or generate discussion. | 20% | 20% | ||||||||
| Grammar, Syntax, APA: APA format, grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation are accurate or with no errors. | 10% | 10% | ||||||||
| Total Percentage | 100% | 100% | ||||||||
| Possible Points | 50 | |||||||||
| Points Earned | 50 | |||||||||