NRSG 314 Unit 1 Discussion Board 2

NRSG 314 Unit 1 Discussion Board 2

NRSG 314 Unit 1 Discussion Board 2

Quality improvement processes are crucial for achieving excellent health outcomes. Before examining personal experiences of quality improvement, it is crucial to reflect on what the process entails. Nursing research depicts quality improvement as the framework health care organizations use to systematically improve care (CMS.gov, 2021). Its primary objective is to standardize processes to reduce variation and improve outcomes. Quality indicators include prevention, patient safety, inpatient quality indicators, and others (Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2020). Therefore, any effort to improve any indicator improves patient outcomes.

As a participant, I have experienced several quality improvement processes within a health care setting. An example highly practical in today’s practice is assessing the impacts of a nursing shortage and empowering nurses to cope with the adverse effects of the shortage. As a prevalent practice problem, a nursing shortage leads to exhaustion of nursing staff, triggering nurse burnout (Dall’Ora et al., 2020; Shah et al., 2021). Consequently, the nursing staffing cannot address patient needs timely and comprehensively, lowering the quality of care. Assessing the manifestations and the magnitude of impacts helped the organization to respond effectively through empowerment and motivation programs.

Quality improvement processes have different pros and cons. In agreement with Hill et al. (2020), quality improvement is the foundation of effective, efficient, and safe care. Regarding pros, medication error prevention interventions such as technology adoption improve accuracy and timeliness of care. They are also problem-driven processes. However, such interventions are usually costly to implement, particularly in small organizations. Employee empowerment programs such as resilience building and nurse motivation are people-centered and sustainable. However, they are time-consuming and require intensive planning.

 

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NRSG 314 Unit 1 Discussion Board 2

NRSG 314 Unit 1 Discussion Board 2 References

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (2020). AHRQ quality indicator tools for data analytics. https://www.ahrq.gov/data/qualityindicators/index.html

CMS.gov. (2021). Quality measurement and quality improvement. https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Quality-Initiatives-Patient-Assessment-Instruments/MMS/Quality-Measure-and-Quality-Improvement-#:~:text=Quality%20improvement%20is%20the%20framework,%2C%20healthcare%20systems%2C%20and%20organizations.

Dall’Ora, C., Ball, J., Reinius, M., & Griffiths, P. (2020). Burnout in nursing: a theoretical review. Human Resources for Health, 18(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12960-020-00469-9

Hill, J. E., Stephani, A. M., Sapple, P., & Clegg, A. J. (2020). The effectiveness of continuous quality improvement for developing professional practice and improving health care outcomes: A systematic review. Implementation Science, 15(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-020-0975-2

Shah, M. K., Gandrakota, N., Cimiotti, J. P., Ghose, N., Moore, M., & Ali, M. K. (2021). Prevalence of and factors associated with nurse burnout in the US. JAMA Network Open, 4(2), e2036469-e2036469. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.36469.

Assignment Details

Assignment Description

Primary Discussion Response is due by Thursday (11:59:59pm Central), Peer Responses are due by Saturday (11:59:59pm Central).

Primary Task Response: Within the Discussion Board area, write 250 words that respond to the following questions with your

NRSG 314 Unit 1 Discussion Board 2
NRSG 314 Unit 1 Discussion Board 2

thoughts, ideas, and comments. This will be the foundation for future discussions by your classmates. You are required to use 1 scholarly resource in addition to your textbook. Be substantive and clear, and use examples to reinforce your ideas.

You are discussing the quality improvement process with a colleague so that your colleague gains a better understanding of the process. Address the following:

  • As either a participant or an implementer, discuss 1 quality improvement process that you have had exposure to or experience with in a heath care setting.
  • Briefly compare the pros and cons of 2 quality improvement processes that are used in your health care setting.

Responses to Other Students: Respond to at least 2 of your fellow classmates with at least a 100-word reply about their Primary Task Response regarding items you found to be compelling and enlightening. To help you with your discussion, please consider the following questions:

  • What did you learn from your classmate’s posting?
  • What additional questions do you have after reading the posting?
  • What clarification do you need regarding the posting?
  • What differences or similarities do you see between your posting and other classmates’ postings?

NRSG 314 Unit 1 Discussion Board 2  Rubric

The Discussion Board Grading Rubric is a scoring tool that represents the performance expectations for the discussion. This grading rubric is divided into components that provide a clear description of what should be included within each component of the discussion. It is the road map that can help lead your discussion. Discussion Board Grading Rubric

For assistance with your assignment, please use your text, Web resources, and all course materials.