PSY 5110 Week 5 – Assignment: Evaluate Statistical Analyses 

PSY 5110 Week 5 – Assignment: Evaluate Statistical Analyses 

PSY 5110 Week 5 – Assignment Evaluate Statistical Analyses

Research Scenario 1

Research Scenario 1 involves finding the effects of a new weight loss supplement. The answers to the prompts are as shown below:

Appropriate null hypothesis: The newly administered weight loss supplement has no significant effect.

Appropriate alternative hypothesis: The newly administered weight loss supplement has a significant effect.

The type of analysis that would be appropriate in answering this research question:  The type of analysis that would be appropriate in answering the research question is correlation analysis because, through correlation analysis, the researcher can compare the impact of the supplement on those who got it and those who did not receive the supplement (Miot et al.,2018). This type of analysis majorly focuses on determining the link or relationship between variables. A correlation is usually represented by numerical numbers, which may indirectly or directly vary based on the nature of the existing relationship (Schober & Vetter, 2020).

The independent and dependent variables in the analysis: The new supplement and placebo are independent variables, while weight is the dependent variable.

Levels of the independent variable: Control and experimental.

Levels of measurement for each variable: new supplement: Nominal, Placebo: Nominal, Weight: Ordinal.

Type 1 error of the study: Type I error would exist in a case where the research finds out that the supplement has a significant effect when it is omitted from the study

Type 2 error of the study: Type II error would exist in a case where the researcher finds out that the supplement has no significant effect when it actually has a significant effect.

Research Scenario 2

Research scenario 2 entails a researcher interested in whether certain memory strategies help people remember information. As such, the answers to the prompts are shown below.

Appropriate null hypothesis: There is no significant difference in the words recalled concerning each of the three categories.

Appropriate alternative hypothesis: There is a significant difference in the words recalled concerning each of the three categories.

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: PSY 5110 Week 5 – Assignment: Evaluate Statistical Analyses 

The type of analysis that would be appropriate in answering this research question: The most appropriate analysis for

PSY 5110 Week 5 - Assignment Evaluate Statistical Analyses
PSY 5110 Week 5 – Assignment Evaluate Statistical Analyses

answering this research question is descriptive analysis (Kemp et al.,2018). The descriptive analysis gives the researcher concise and clear measurements and descriptions for each of the categories (Gravetter & Forzano, 2018). In this research question, descriptions are needed to help in assessing the performance of every memory strategy by evaluating the respondents.

The independent and dependent variables in the analysis. Words and memory strategies are independent variables while remembering is the dependent variable.

Levels of the independent variable: Both the independent variable are experimental levels.

Levels of measurement for each variable: Remembering: ordinal, words: nominal, Memory strategies: nominal.

Type 1 error of the study: Type I error would occur if the null hypothesis is rejected when all the categories displayed no significant difference.

Type 2 error of the study: This error would occur upon acceptance of the null hypothesis when all the categories exhibit significant difference.

Research Scenario 3

Research scenario three entails a local manufacturing company interested in determining whether their employees are as happy with their jobs as other employees. Therefore, the answers to the prompts are as shown below:

Appropriate null hypothesis:  The employees’ happiness is the same as those of other employees.

Appropriate alternative hypothesis: The employees’ happiness differs from that of other employees.

The type of analysis that would be appropriate in answering this research question: The suitable analysis for this research question is descriptive analysis. Through this analysis, the researcher will be able to get measurements and summaries concerning the company and compare the obtained results with those of other companies. Therefore, descriptive statistics helps in describing the features of the data set and produces sample summaries (Sidel et al.,2018).

The independent and dependent variables in the analysis. The independent variable is employees, while the dependent variable is happiness.

Levels of the independent variable: The level of the independent variable is experimental.

Levels of measurement for each variable: The level of measurement of the employee variable is nominal, while happiness is ordinal (Beatty & Beatty, 2018).

Type 1 error of the study: Type I error would occur if the null hypothesis is rejected when the employees’ happiness is equal to that of the other employees.

Type 2 error of the study: Type II error would occur if the null hypothesis is accepted and the employees’ happiness is different from that of other employees.

PSY 5110 Week 5 – Assignment: Evaluate Statistical Analyses  References

Beatty, W., & Beatty, W. (2018). Four Levels (Scales) of Data Measurement: It’s All About Information. Decision Support Using Nonparametric Statistics, 17–22. Doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-68264-8_4

Gravetter, F. J., & Forzano, L. A. B. (2018). Research methods for the behavioral sciences. Cengage learning.

Kemp, S. E., Ng, M., Hollowood, T., & Hort, J. (2018). Introduction to descriptive analysis. Descriptive Analysis In Sensory Evaluation, 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118991657.ch1

Miot, H. A. (2018). Correlation analysis in clinical and experimental studies. Jornal Vascular Brasileiro, 17, 275-279. https://doi.org/10.1590/1677-5449.174118

Schober, P., & Vetter, T. R. (2020). Correlation analysis in medical research. Anesthesia & Analgesia, 130(2), 332. Doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004578

Sidel, J. L., Bleibaum, R. N., & Tao, K. C. (2018). Quantitative descriptive analysis. Descriptive Analysis in Sensory Evaluation, 287-318. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118991657.ch8

This week, you have learned about t-tests and ANOVA and will apply what you have learned in the evaluation of several research scenarios. For this task, you will read each research scenario and answer the questions regarding each one.

 

Research Scenario 1

A researcher is interested in the effects of a new weight loss supplement. Participants in this double-blind study are randomly assigned to either a group that receives the new supplement or a group that receives a placebo. Participants are weighed before starting the program. After 6 weeks of taking either the new supplement or the placebo, participants return to the lab to be weighed.

Provide the appropriate null and alternative hypotheses.

Determine which type of analysis would be appropriate to answer this research question. Be specific and support your answer using the textbook or other course materials.

Name the independent and dependent variables used in the analysis. What are the levels of the independent variable?

Indicate the levels of measurement for each variable.

Describe the Type I error for this study.

Describe the Type II error for this study.

 

Research Scenario 2

A researcher is interested in whether certain memory strategies help people to remember information. This researcher employs students from a local college, and then randomly assigns them to one of three groups—the visualization group, the mnemonic technique group, and the rote repetition group. Participants in each group receive an hour of instruction regarding how to use the particular technique to remember lists of words. After the instruction, all participants are presented with a list of 60 words that they are instructed to remember. The words are presented one-at-a time on a computer screen. After the last word is presented, all participants are instructed to recall as many words as possible by writing them on a blank sheet of paper. All participants are given 10 minutes to recall the words.

Provide the appropriate null and alternative hypotheses.

Indicate which type of analysis would be appropriate to answer this research question. Be specific and support your answer using the textbook or other course materials.

Name the independent and dependent variables used in the analysis. What are the levels of the independent variable?

Indicate the levels of measurement for each variable.

Describe the Type I error for this study.

Describe the Type II error for this study

 

Research Scenario 3

A local manufacturing company is interested in determining whether their employees are as happy with their jobs as other employees. The manufacturing company asked the workers, who volunteered to participate, to rate their happiness at work on a scale from 1 to 10 where 1 was not at all happy and 10 was extremely happy. The manufacturing company found that the mean happiness rating for their employees is 7.3. In the general population of workers in the United States, the mean happiness rating is 6

Provide the appropriate null and alternative hypotheses.

Determine which type of analysis would be appropriate to answer this research question. Be specific. Please support your answer using the textbook or other course materials.

Name the variables used in the analysis.

What are the levels of measurement for each variable?

Describe the Type I error for this study.

Describe the Type II error for this study

 

Length: 1-2 pages

 

Your paper should demonstrate thoughtful consideration of the ideas and concepts presented in the course by providing new thoughts and insights relating directly to this topic. Your response should reflect scholarly writing and current APA standards.

As we begin this session, I would like to take this opportunity to clarify my expectations for this course:

Please note that GCU Online weeks run from Thursday (Day 1) through Wednesday (Day 7).

 

Course Room Etiquette:

  • It is my expectation that all learners will respect the thoughts and ideas presented in the discussions.
  • All postings should be presented in a respectful, professional manner. Remember – different points of view add richness and depth to the course!

 

Office Hours:

  • My office hours vary so feel free to shoot me an email at Kelly.[email protected] or my office phone is 602.639.6517 and I will get back to you within one business day or as soon as possible.
  • Phone appointments can be scheduled as well. Send me an email and the best time to call you, along with your phone number to make an appointment.
  • I welcome all inquiries and questions as we spend this term together. My preference is that everyone utilizes the Questions to Instructor forum. In the event your question is of a personal nature, please feel free to post in the Individual Questions for Instructor forum I will respond to all posts or emails within 24 or sooner.

 

Late Policy and Grading Policy

Discussion questions:

  • I do not mark off for late DQ’s.
  •  I would rather you take the time to read the materials and respond to the DQ’s in a scholarly way, demonstrating your understanding of the materials.
  • I will not accept any DQ submissions after day 7, 11:59 PM (AZ Time) of the week.
  • Individual written assignments – due by 11:59 PM AZ Time Zone on the due dates indicated for each class deliverable.

Assignments:

  • Assignments turned in after their specified due dates are subject to a late penalty of -10%, each day late, of the available credit. Please refer to the student academic handbook and GCU policy.
  • Any activity or assignment submitted after the due date will be subject to GCU’s late policy
  • Extenuating circumstances may justify exceptions, which are at my sole discretion. If an extenuating circumstance should arise, please contact me privately as soon as possible.
  • No assignments can be accepted for grading after midnight on the final day of class.
  • All assignments will be graded in accordance with the Assignment Grading Rubrics

Participation

  • Participation in each week’s Discussion Board forum accounts for a large percentage of your final grade in this course.
  • Please review the Course Syllabus for a comprehensive overview of course deliverables and the value associated with each.
  • It is my expectation that each of you will substantially contribute to the course discussion forums and respond to the posts of at least three other learners.
  • A substantive post should be at least 200 words. Responses such as “great posts” or “I agree” do not meet the active engagement expectation.
  • Please feel free to draw on personal examples as you develop your responses to the Discussion Questions but you do need to demonstrate your understanding of the materials.
  • I do expect outside sources as well as class materials to formulate your post.
  • APA format is not necessary for DQ responses, but I do expect a proper citation for references.
  • Please use peer-related journals found through the GCU library and/or class materials to formulate your answers. Do not try to “Google” DQ’s as I am looking for class materials and examples from the weekly materials.
  • I will not accept responses that are from Wikipedia, Business dictionary.com, or other popular business websites. You will not receive credit for generic web searches – this does not demonstrate graduate-level research.
  • Stay away from the use of personal pronouns when writing. As a graduate student, you are expected to write based on research and gathering of facts. Demonstrating your understanding of the materials is what you will be graded on. You will be marked down for lack of evidence to support your ideas.

Plagiarism

  • Plagiarism is the act of claiming credit for another’s work, accomplishments, or ideas without appropriate acknowledgment of the source of the information by including in-text citations and references.
  • This course requires the utilization of APA format for all course deliverables as noted in the course syllabus.
  • Whether this happens deliberately or inadvertently, whenever plagiarism has occurred, you have committed a Code of Conduct violation.
  • Please review your LopesWrite report prior to final submission.
  • Every act of plagiarism, no matter the severity, must be reported to the GCU administration (this includes your DQ’s, posts to your peers, and your papers).

Plagiarism includes:

  • Representing the ideas, expressions, or materials of another without due credit.
  • Paraphrasing or condensing ideas from another person’s work without proper citation and referencing.
  • Failing to document direct quotations without proper citation and referencing.
  • Depending upon the amount, severity, and frequency of the plagiarism that is committed, students may receive in-class penalties that range from coaching (for a minor omission), -20% grade penalties for resubmission, or zero credit for a specific assignment. University-level penalties may also occur, including suspension or even expulsion from the University.
  • If you are at all uncertain about what constitutes plagiarism, you should review the resources available in the Student Success Center. Also, please review the University’s policies about plagiarism which are covered in more detail in the GCU Catalog and the Student Handbook.
  • We will be utilizing the GCU APA Style Guide 7th edition located in the Student Success Center > The Writing Center for all course deliverables.

LopesWrite

  • All course assignments must be uploaded to the specific Module Assignment Drop Box, and also submitted to LopesWrite every week.
  • Please ensure that your assignment is uploaded to both locations under the Assignments DropBox. Detailed instructions for using LopesWrite are located in the Student Success Center.

Assignment Submissions

  • Please note that Microsoft Office is the software requirement at GCU.
  • I can open Word files or any file that is saved with a .rtf (Rich Text Format) extension. I am unable to open .wps files.
  • If you are using a “.wps” word processor, please save your files using the .rtf extension that is available from the drop-down box before uploading your files to the Assignment Drop Box.

Grade of Incomplete

  • The final grade of Incomplete is granted at the discretion of the instructor; however, students must meet certain specific criteria before this grade accommodation is even possible to consider.
  • The grade of Incomplete is reserved for times when students experience a serious extenuating circumstance or a crisis during the last week of class which prevents the completion of course requirements before the close of the grading period. Students also must pass the course at the time the request is made.
  • Please contact me personally if you are having difficulties in meeting course requirements or class deadlines during our time together. In addition, if you are experiencing personal challenges or difficulties, it is best to contact the Academic Counselor so that you can discuss the options that might be available to you, as well as each option’s academic and financial repercussions.

Grade Disputes

  • If you have any questions about a grade you have earned on an individual assignment or activity, please get in touch with me personally for further clarification.
  • While I have made every attempt to grade you fairly, on occasion a misunderstanding may occur, so please allow me the opportunity to learn your perspective if you believe this has occurred. Together, we should be able to resolve grading issues on individual assignments.
  • However, after we have discussed individual assignments’ point scores, if you still believe that the final grade you have earned at the end of the course is not commensurate with the quality of work you produced for this class, there is a formal Grade Grievance procedure which is outlined in the GCU Catalog and Student Handbook.